Gotta look out for the honeycomb to chocolate ratio. It's important! Did you know some chocolate bars have a ratio of 0? It's appalling, and needs to be changed!EmzOLV said:
I love this description. Like a Kit-Kat Chunky but with a completely different centre.MattW456 said:
I know, it's just so terrible. These candy manufacturers need to work on their ratios. I've been trying for years to get them to make the bourbon biscuit/custard cream ratio better - we all know that the best way to do this is to get two biscuits, bite the top biscuit off each one and put them together. But we shouldn't be doing this - they should make a fulfilling, delicious and well designed snack that requires little effort on my behalf to eat it.J03bot said:
they had a perfect ratio going on. It was like love <3
I'm suddenly in love with the idea of a bourbon/custard cream hybrid...EmzOLV said:I know, it's just so terrible. These candy manufacturers need to work on their ratios. I've been trying for years to get them to make the bourbon biscuit/custard cream ratio better - we all know that the best way to do this is to get two biscuits, bite the top biscuit off each one and put them together. But we shouldn't be doing this - they should make a fulfilling, delicious and well designed snack that requires little effort on my behalf to eat it.J03bot said:
KitKat Chunkies on the other hand, now that's a biscuit in the right proportions. And you can still nibble all the chocolate off first.
I really want Honeycomb Yorkies back
You are so right about regular kitkats - they don't have enough chocolate. Unless you're lucky to get the whole chocolate kitkat which is pretty sweet! And same with jaffa cakes.J03bot said:
Ah, Maltesers. Like an entire packet of tiny, tiny crunchies...EmzOLV said:You are so right about regular kitkats - they don't have enough chocolate. Unless you're lucky to get the whole chocolate kitkat which is pretty sweet! And same with jaffa cakes.J03bot said:
I also think that maltesars are sometimes hit and miss - they need 1-2mm of chocolate and sometimes its like it's barely dipped. What's the point?
I'm jealous of your job
You know the Americans call sweets "candies".PayJ567 said:
Very wise point on the KitKat - but its like a nice little surprise. I don't want to take away it's identity just because it failed to get some wafer. Plus if you're lucky, there'll be wafer in the second bar.J03bot said:Ah, Maltesers. Like an entire packet of tiny, tiny crunchies...
The all chocolate kitkat is always a good thing, but at the same time, you bought it because you wanted the biscuity goodness. Without that, it's not really a kitkat.
And now I really, really want something with chocolate. Why is there nothing chocolatey in my house?
EDIT: Also, awesome Chun-Li costume! Halloween, I presume?
Halloweeeeen! Scary haha.
Yay! Magic Stars. Although I'm given to understand that chocolate doesn't travel via internet so well. It comes out of the other end all binary-ish. And the '1's and '0's don't taste so great...EmzOLV said:Very wise point on the KitKat - but its like a nice little surprise. I don't want to take away it's identity just because it failed to get some wafer. Plus if you're lucky, there'll be wafer in the second bar.
I'll send you some milky way magic stars which I'm currently consuming. Oh wait. I can get you some new milky way magic stars since I've finished this packet.
Ad yep
In fairness, about 15 of those posts have been us discussing other forms of sweets.EmzOLV said:I was under the hope the 'O's would help provide a few more bubbles into already bubbly chocolate. But it's fineJ03bot said:
After 56 posts I'm impressed a Crunchie which is so simple in form could obtain so many descriptions!
In hindsight, this has been nothing more than an exploration, research into the hidden depths which not only define the Crunchie in all of its glory, but highlight other chocolatey choices.J03bot said:
