Yes, this was my first reaction.neurohazzard said:"Some gamers might believe that Activision is the evil empire, but Activision doesn't feel that way about itself at all."
Of course they don't, evil empires never think they're evil, hell, that's part of what MAKES them evil.
...Aaaaand this was my second.Stickfigure said:OK, you're not evil, then. Just stupid.
Activision's great accomplishments of the last few years:
- Infinity Ward debacle, essentially killing off their superior COD developer.
- Brutal Legend debacle, cancelling a nearly-finished game, then suing when someone else decided to finish.
- The dilution of the once-proud hero franchise, with massive flops like the DJ Hero series and Band Hero.
- Brutal Legend debacle part 2, where they make a mediocre Guitar Hero that attempts to remake the general atmosphere of Brutal Legend.
- Announcing plans to charge for FMVs
Then the inclusive nature with which they embrace their core audience with lines such as:
- "Don't do female leads because they don't sell."
- "The goal that I had in bringing a lot of the packaged goods folks into Activision about 10 years ago was to take all the fun out of making video games."
- "? You know if it was left to me, I would raise the prices even further,?
Activision has frankly been living off sheer force of the Call of Duty series' momentum and everything Blizzard does. And the only reason Blizzard seems to progress is because Activision has almost no power over them.
I imagine it was "just business", then, when you decided to give the middle finger to the two men who helped you make a shitton of money off Modern Warfare 2?
Frankly, no matter what Activision get's people to say about it, they're never going to have the image of some dark lord peering at the tiny peasents below from his spikey black fortress of doom.
I can't help but wonder what Activision would look like if Kotick wasn't there spewing his hate for their consumers?