He was just (accurately) predicting the responses to this article. Personally, I'm withholding judgment until I see the cast.Darth_Payn said:Also, Bob, don't think I didn't notice the SEXISM tag at the bottom.
He was just (accurately) predicting the responses to this article. Personally, I'm withholding judgment until I see the cast.Darth_Payn said:Also, Bob, don't think I didn't notice the SEXISM tag at the bottom.
What comedy roles has she had? I'm not familiar with them.Adam Jensen said:Yes. Awesome!
IMO, Scarlett Johansson needs to be in this. She nailed every comedy role she was in.
Gosh-darn it! I'LL BET ANITA SARKEESIAN'S BEHIND THIS! IT'S HER KICKSTARTER!!!Zachary Amaranth said:You just don't get it, man. Because the cast are women, they will talk about girl things! And they will force you to go!
My God, she's been playing the long game.Under_your_bed said:Gosh-darn it! I'LL BET ANITA SARKEESIAN'S BEHIND THIS! IT'S HER KICKSTARTER!!!Zachary Amaranth said:You just don't get it, man. Because the cast are women, they will talk about girl things! And they will force you to go!
Don't be silly. Thunderfoot[footnote]Peace Be Upon Him[/footnote] assures me that she's literally never played a game ever.Zachary Amaranth said:My God, she's been playing the long game.
You mean to tell me a bigtime Hollywood star is *glup*... vain? It's an outrage! Not Robert Downey Jr. too, say it ain't so!!!8bitOwl said:Scarlett Johansson is a vain slut IRL. I saw an interview with her and I was appalled to see it. I was kinda hoping she was a smart girl playing the sexy doll on screen because it's good money.
Touché! But still, the world must be warned of her evil mistressminding.Under_your_bed said:Don't be silly. Thunderfoot[footnote]Peace Be Upon Him[/footnote] assures me that she's literally never played a game ever.Zachary Amaranth said:My God, she's been playing the long game.
Zachary Amaranth said:I don't think you know what "social justice" is. I know that the internet froths in a rage at the "social justice warrior," but are you seriously pro-slavery and miscegnation and shit?NuclearKangaroo said:i hate Social Justice, now i dont know if, when an artist wants to do some gender swapping, it is because he/she wants to experiment with something different or is because of pandering
i guess ill wait and see
Anyway, yeah. I hate pandering. Only straight white dudes should be pandered to.
yes i mean exaactly that, i said these exact wordspro-slavery and miscegnation and shit?
But that's what social justice is. Even if you insist I "know what you mean." And that was kind of my point. That was why I saidNuclearKangaroo said:yes i mean exaactly that, i said these exact words
Zachary Amaranth said:But that's what social justice is. Even if you insist I "know what you mean." And that was kind of my point. That was why I saidNuclearKangaroo said:yes i mean exaactly that, i said these exact words
"I don't think you know what "social justice" is." Instead of getting offended that I accused you of saying things I didn't accuse you of saying, maybe read and understand what I actually said?
Also, whether or not you're white changes nothing, so I don't know why you brought it up, mate. It's almost like you're responding by rote to accusations you expect me to make, rather than things I actually say.
yeah that didnt sound like you were calling me a straight white dude at all...Anyway, yeah. I hate pandering. Only straight white dudes should be pandered to
im sorry are you trying to imply minorities dont know whats good for them? if a man wants to be a slave, let him be a slave, if he wants to be free, let him be freeZachary Amaranth said:But, for the record.
There were blacks who opposed abolition. There were women who opposed suffrage. There were gays (and still are) who opposed gay marriage. There are people on welfare/medicaid in this country who oppose government assistance. That doesn't make them right. Their race/sex/sexuality/economic status is largely irrelevant. As is yours to my statement.
Well you did recently drag white guys into a topic that wasn't about white guys for no real reason.Zachary Amaranth said:But that's what social justice is. Even if you insist I "know what you mean." And that was kind of my point. That was why I saidNuclearKangaroo said:yes i mean exaactly that, i said these exact words
"I don't think you know what "social justice" is." Instead of getting offended that I accused you of saying things I didn't accuse you of saying, maybe read and understand what I actually said?
Also, whether or not you're white changes nothing, so I don't know why you brought it up, mate.
Is it slavery if you agree to it? Well I suppose if you don't have an option to walk away it's slavery but if you chose that route in the first place does that negate it?NuclearKangaroo said:Zachary Amaranth said:But that's what social justice is. Even if you insist I "know what you mean." And that was kind of my point. That was why I saidNuclearKangaroo said:yes i mean exaactly that, i said these exact words
"I don't think you know what "social justice" is." Instead of getting offended that I accused you of saying things I didn't accuse you of saying, maybe read and understand what I actually said?
Also, whether or not you're white changes nothing, so I don't know why you brought it up, mate. It's almost like you're responding by rote to accusations you expect me to make, rather than things I actually say.yeah that didnt sound like you were calling me a straight white dude at all...Anyway, yeah. I hate pandering. Only straight white dudes should be pandered to
if you dont like the term social justice, how about "internet social justice"? i mean its painfully clear what im talking about, but aparently not using the correct word is enough to get acussations of being s supporter of slavery
so ok, internet social justice, i think its fair to say we both know what i mean with this, i hate it, it makes it harder for me to know when an artist wants to do something different and when its pandering to certain people
im sorry are you trying to imply minorities dont know whats good for them? if a man wants to be a slave, let him be a slave, if he wants to be free, let him be freeZachary Amaranth said:But, for the record.
There were blacks who opposed abolition. There were women who opposed suffrage. There were gays (and still are) who opposed gay marriage. There are people on welfare/medicaid in this country who oppose government assistance. That doesn't make them right. Their race/sex/sexuality/economic status is largely irrelevant. As is yours to my statement.
Kathy Bates called and she's pissed. You better run before she goes Annie Wilkes on you.8bitOwl said:Adam Jensen said:Yes. Awesome!
IMO, Scarlett Johansson needs to be in this. She nailed every comedy role she was in.
NO. A MILLION TIMES NO.
"Hilarious women" will apparently translate to "sexy, attractive women", isn't it? Look at the original Ghostbusters. But of course, women can't be funny, they need to be, first and foremost, sexy.
My sentiments exactly.tzimize said:This is probably gonna be so painful to watch. Knowing hollywood they'll cast pretty ladies instead of funny ladies...and it'll be horrible.
As much as I absolutely hate reboots, if they actually made this into a comedy with actual funny women, it would be extremely groundbreaking. It would show women can do more than look pretty on the screen.
Damn those straw men and their terrible opinions.Under_your_bed said:Oh no, a "Niche" movie for the whiny vocal minority called "women" that I probably won't ever watch or hear about again!
WHY MUST YOU RUIN MY FILMS LIKE THIS, FEMINISM?!?!