Thank god, someone else out there like me.Jumping_Over_Fences said:I enjoyed Tremors 4. Sure, it was not better than the original, but it was still a good movie.
...okay maybe not that good of a movie, quality wise, but for some reason I love all Tremors movies. So, if it was enjoyable, it was good.
... but, sorry, you're still wrong. But I CAN however, see your logic/reasoning. But that doesn't change how you're wrong.gxs said:Well the story in Hobbit takes place when Bilbo is about the same age as Frodo so from my point of view hobbit is a prequel and it doesn't matter if it was written first or last. I look at the time period that the book is set in not the actual order of writing (because that would wreak havoc on some of the books I read).runtheplacered said:Wrong. Two posts above you I proved this to you. The Hobbit was published in 37. The Lord of the Rings was published in the 50's. A prequel is only a prequel if it comes before a writing that has already been published. You can't start off with a prequel.gxs said:Yes it is. Bilbo finds the ring in Hobit. It's a prequel.El Taco the Rogue said:Its not a prequel it was written first
I like the Fellowship more than the others strangely, mostly the part with just the hobbits and strider.Clashero said:I only mentioned The Fellowship of the Ring. Overall, the whole trilogy (I'm calling it that, although true Tolkienists would say that it's all one big book) is more epic and overall just better than The Hobbit.iain62a said:They're two very different, but very good novels.Clashero said:The Hobbit was better than The Fellowship of the Ring *ducks for cover*
The Lord of The Rings is more of an epic tale of high fantasy, whereas the Hobbit is more like a great big, light-hearted adventure.
I love them both equally though.
In other words, The Two Towers and The Return of The King were better than The Hobbit, which was in turn better than The Fellowship of The Ring, due to its strange pacing and sometimes dull dialogue (that said, if I were to rate Fellowship, I'd definitely give it at least a 9)
the hobbit kicked soo much assClashero said:As was said before, MGS3 and DMC3.
The Hobbit was better than The Fellowship of the Ring *ducks for cover*
Underworld 3 was the best Underworld in my opinion.
The Scorpion King was less awful than The Mummy.
The new Star Trek movie is my favourite.
San Andreas in technically a prequel to GTA III, and it was better.
Fatal Frame II was better than I, but not as good as III.