Amazon warehouses unsafe even by warehouse standards

Gergar12

Elite Member
Legacy
Apr 24, 2020
3,391
809
118
Country
United States
There's much to learn from Amazon corporate, I actually like the adversarial nature of their meetings, maybe they could tone it down since they seem to overdo it, but it's a contrast to many people failing to debate, and criticize bad stuff in fear of offending someone. That's how you filter bad plans from succeeding in business, and something many people in public service(DOD for example), and poorly ran companies could learn from.

But their warehouses are long-term societal, and health hazards that I wouldn't don't even want a mass shooter to be forced to work in. I literally don't have Amazon Prime out of spite because of their horrific practices.
 

Gordon_4

The Big Engine
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
6,111
5,404
118
Australia
There's much to learn from Amazon corporate, I actually like the adversarial nature of their meetings, maybe they could tone it down since they seem to overdo it, but it's a contrast to many people failing to debate, and criticize bad stuff in fear of offending someone. That's how you filter bad plans from succeeding in business, and something many people in public service(DOD for example), and poorly ran companies could learn from.
If you need meetings to turn into slanging matches to be able to point out a bad idea you're already being run by fucking idiots.
 

Phoenixmgs

The Muse of Fate
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
9,052
801
118
w/ M'Kraan Crystal
Gender
Male
See, you're doing it again. You're assuming that you and only you know what you're talking about. I'm quite aware of what socialism is, in fact I probably understand it better than you do, guy.

And the reason I have a problem with you is because you're as arrogant as you are mendacious. Every post of yours is like a cheese grater to the scrote because the egomania is just that overbearing.
Why'd you respond in this way (listing things that aren't socialism) if you knew what socialism is? Socialism isn't some complex concept, don't know why you're trying to one-up someone on the definition of a basic word. We are for very much of the same things yet you can't even admit common ground on anything. And if you're so for socialism, why are you so against republicans when democrats lean the same way as republicans economically?

(looks at the poverty rate now, along with medical bankruptcies, student debt and climate change) Yeah, it's doing a real bang-up fucking job, isn't it?
Please show me some socialist economy doing better. Just because unfettered capitalism is bad doesn't mean you just flush it down the toilet.
I'm not asking for much. Free college, Medicare for All, stronger labor laws, some other things. Things that work in the rest of the developed world but the US doesn't have because greed.
---


So, just skipping over the bit where we get called socialists for arguing we should have policies like all those other capitalist countries because in the US you get called a socialist for not wanting to hunt the homeless for sport?

Cool.

The reason most of the people who identify as socialists in the US call themselves that is because they advocate for any type of government regulation of corporations at all, be it healthcare or income inequality or environmental regulations or labor rights or raising taxes the fabulously wealthy or rent relief or consumer protections or social security or not allowing politicians to be bribed by unlimited campaign spending or tax fruad or interracial marriage or any number of basic, common sense things.

If you call everything you don't like socialist, then people who like what you don't like will call themselves socialists. And despite claims to the contrary, the media just basically let's the Right define every term in politics in the US
I replied to you same exact question about everything getting called socialism earlier in the thread. Doesn't everyone know that's like just a stupid meme at this point? I'm like a person you're talking to, not some FOX news viewer stereotype and I use words based on their meanings not whatever bullshit meaning people think they have now. What you listed is not socialism. I'm for all the stuff you just listed but I'm not for socialism and nothing you listed is what socialism is.

Socialism.jpg

Then why do so few capitalists know what it is? For that matter, why do so few capitalists understand what capitalism is?

Quick test, seeing as you're so good at reading what my philosophical and political views are. What do I believe? What system do I actually believe in?

That's not the point I made and the fact that you think you're clever when that point sailed right over your head proves how little you actually understand anything. The very simple point I was making was that just because the whole world adopts a system doesn't prove it's good. The world has frequently adopted many horrid systems. So just saying


Is not proof that capitalism is good and is in fact an incredibly childish and silly thing to say.

What definitions have I not looked up?

Go ahead and tell me what countries I think we should emulate.

It is.


But seriously you are making a lot of assumptions about what it is I believe, so tell me what is it I actually believe?
I don't have like round table discussions with capitalists so I wouldn't know. Plus, it's not like normal conversation with people result in discussing what capitalism is. I don't really care who knows or doesn't know what capitalism is. You tell me what you believe.

Your point was very bad, that's why it "sailed right over my head". If you actually want to discuss something, then discuss it instead of throwing out something like eating can't be good because Hitler ate food and look what happened with that. Most things that are universally adopted are such for good reason.

I said 'you guys' not specifically you as a few have said they are for policies of certain countries but said countries aren't socialist so why would someone be a socialist then? If you're in that group, then yes, you haven't looked up what socialism is.

That was more in response to Buyetyen as I grouped both comments together because they were similar enough. Buyetyen specifically talked about policies that many Nordic countries have that the US should have.

How the fuck is capitalism right wing when some of the most left leaning countries in the world are capitalist? I agree in theory with most of what Buyetyen listed he wanted policy-wise, what else do you want to know? If you guys are attacking someone on your own team so much, how are you ever going to convert anyone not on your team to your team? Don't you see that's what they've got you all doing, thinking half the people are basically evil and shouldn't be listened to so that you never come together? The left sees the right as evil, the right sees the left as evil, that's a really bad place for a society to be. That's why you got people crying and being depressed when Trump won and you got people thinking the election was rigged when Trump lost because any lost feels like a war was just lost vs a rather tiny battle. It's basically the Domino theory all over again.
 

Cheetodust

Elite Member
Jun 2, 2020
1,582
2,290
118
Country
Ireland
.
Your point was very bad, that's why it "sailed right over my head".
If capitalism is so bad, then why is basically every single country in the world using it?
it was in response to this. Man, if you think that is an intelligent point maybe it is time to admit you're not as smart as you think.

Most things that are universally adopted are such for good reason.
if you genuinely can't see how that isn't proof something is good then you're beyond reasoning with. I'm not using it to prove it is bad, which your Hitler analogy would imply, I'm just pointing out that it is not an argument that it's good. Most countries adopted some form of mask wearing during the pandemic. So does that mean it works then?
 

Buyetyen

Elite Member
May 11, 2020
3,129
2,362
118
Country
USA
And if you're so for socialism, why are you so against republicans when democrats lean the same way as republicans economically?
Because as bad as the Dems are, the Repubs are worse. And voting 3rd party is not a viable solution right now because of the current setup of money in the system. All it does is split the vote and make it easier for Republican wank stains to hold onto power. The Democrats are a center-right party with a few progressives that I support. The Republicans are not a party of serious governance and have declared their intent to roll back a century of progress. This is realpolitik, something your arrogance will not permit you to consider.

Now can we please get back on-topic about Amazon being the fucking worst? Or do you want to continue this pointless exercise?
 
Last edited:

Phoenixmgs

The Muse of Fate
Legacy
Apr 3, 2020
9,052
801
118
w/ M'Kraan Crystal
Gender
Male
it was in response to this. Man, if you think that is an intelligent point maybe it is time to admit you're not as smart as you think.

if you genuinely can't see how that isn't proof something is good then you're beyond reasoning with. I'm not using it to prove it is bad, which your Hitler analogy would imply, I'm just pointing out that it is not an argument that it's good. Most countries adopted some form of mask wearing during the pandemic. So does that mean it works then?
It's somewhat decent proof. Yet the proof that socialism is good is completely absent from everyone claiming to be for socialism.


Because as bad as the Dems are, the Repubs are worse. And voting 3rd party is not a viable solution right now because of the current setup of money in the system. All it does is split the vote and make it easier for Republican wank stains to hold onto power. The Democrats are a center-right party with a few progressives that I support. The Republicans are not a party of serious governance and have declared their intent to roll back a century of progress. This is realpolitik, something your arrogance will not permit you to consider.

Now can we please get back on-topic about Amazon being the fucking worst? Or do you want to continue this pointless exercise?
The Repubs aren't worse for minorities though, that's why black people are doing a reverse migration to the south. 3rd party is very viable if you all just voted for the best candidate. Please explain how the replubs are trying to roll back a century of progress because that's such an extreme exaggeration it's not even funny. California dems did that with Prop 16 in fact.

I stated my stance on Amazon in the first post and then after. I don't buy much at all from Amazon and never have because it was obvious from the start that Amazon is bad for consumers let alone the workers.


it isn't bad... for the ruling class. it's bad for most everyone else and democracy in capitalist countries is a lie. thanks for coming to my TED talk
If you're taking about America, then I agree even though the people can vote them all out even though they never do or never would. It seems like people actually care in other countries or either the ruling class isn't nearly as corrupt.
 

Buyetyen

Elite Member
May 11, 2020
3,129
2,362
118
Country
USA
I stated my stance on Amazon in the first post and then after. I don't buy much at all from Amazon and never have because it was obvious from the start that Amazon is bad for consumers let alone the workers.
Then if you have nothing else to contribute, you can stop posting in this thread. I won't be derailing it any further.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BrawlMan