It really does look unbelievably average anyway. I might have bought it if it didn't look like a copypasta of CoD.
True that, and this wont even be that good. Anything they do, I bet COD has already done better, and Reach is one of the most fun games Ive ever played. This game is done for, I think.Pingieking said:Well, no matter how good a game is, it's not a good idea to release a FPS between CoD and Halo.
Can't quite remember the cliche. Something about a pig and lipstick. Or a purse made from a sow's ear. Irregardless it played like BC 2 without any balance. As much as it would suck for all who worked on it, I'm still hoping it goes tango uniform. I don't know how they expected it to succeed when it does NOTHING new. What's that other thing called? Oh yeah a glut on the market. There's way more than plenty FPS's out and about.uppitycracker said:given the experience i had in the beta, yeah, i don't have high hopes for the MoH franchise either. and i'm not referring to things that can be polished through a beta, i'm referring to the actual game itself.
Medal of Honour really does have its work cut out for it. It doesn't take an industry expert to figure out that MoH will most likely live or die on its multiplayer component. At least from my standpoint, the fact that said multiplayer component is being developed by DICE doesn't bode well. The multiplayer of Bad Company 2 was fine, but didn't really match up to MW2s.Druyn said:True that, and this wont even be that good. Anything they do, I bet COD has already done better, and Reach is one of the most fun games Ive ever played. This game is done for, I think.Pingieking said:Well, no matter how good a game is, it's not a good idea to release a FPS between CoD and Halo.
Yeah, even on the multiplayer, you have the same standard stuff going on. The people who enjoy CoD m0re and the people who love Halo more. Which creates a problem, because being released right in between the two of them means that they have to cpmpete with both instead of just one. As if it wasnt hard enough for them already, they launch it in between the two biggest FPS games this year. Way to go, EA.MarsProbe said:Medal of Honour really does have its work cut out for it. It doesn't take an industry expert to figure out that MoH will most likely live or die on its multiplayer component. At least from my standpoint, the fact that said multiplayer component is being developed by DICE doesn't bode well. The multiplayer of Bad Company 2 was fine, but didn't really match up to MW2s.Druyn said:True that, and this wont even be that good. Anything they do, I bet COD has already done better, and Reach is one of the most fun games Ive ever played. This game is done for, I think.Pingieking said:Well, no matter how good a game is, it's not a good idea to release a FPS between CoD and Halo.
While I've being playing Halo Reach online, I've heard people often say that they're only playing it until Black Ops comes out. Not much mention of MoH in that same way, however.
Translation: "We really don't see why you should buy MoH when there are much better games on the shelf."Andy Chalk said:"We really don't see a rationale for owning all three of these games," he said.