Anonymous Launches Its Very Own Social Network

2xDouble

New member
Mar 15, 2010
2,310
0
0
This makes sense to me. Why bother stealing information when people will just give it to you. And what's the best way to make people give you their personal information willingly? start a social network. ...or put a TV camera in their face, but that's expensive and time-consuming.
 

stewox

New member
Dec 25, 2009
116
0
0
Fully support this, as a hardcore gamer ... but belive me or not, your call.

The ones who are ignorant and kids are the ones posting silly comments from facebook on this topic, Anonymous is not 4CHAN idiots, they just used 4CHAN for the DDOS hive-mind to help out, ofcourse those kids never understood the POINT.

AND OFCOURSE 4CHAN KIDS WILL TROLL EVERYTHING NO MATTER HOW CORRECT AND GOOD-FAITH IT IS.
 

stewox

New member
Dec 25, 2009
116
0
0
There will be times when these kind of people, majority , will be recognized as people in effects of cognitive dissonance and/or having dissociative identity disorder - the masses will OPPOSE any sort of REVOLT automatically whatever it is or how it is, they will find excuses to base their negativity - you are the ones under the control, sheeplets. Anonymous is one of the most important things/ideals that was concieved in the 21st sentury, just like wikileaks.

An example of cognitive dissonance: http://tinyurl.com/3ev6s43
Dissociative identity disorder is explained well on wikipedia.

Seems like many of them already are ... too bad. If you read most of the facebook comments, and this SvenBTB asshole above are one of the nice examples.
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
Activist is a pretty generous term at this point.

I'd call them dicks at best and terrorists at worst.
 

Vonnis

New member
Feb 18, 2011
418
0
0
"This is the sad fact of what happens across the internet when you walk to a different beat of the drum. We've all heard the stories of activists being banned from FaceBook, Twitter, YouTube, and governments blocking their people from these sites as well through organized black-outs,"

Well, that is what happens when a group originally based on anonymity decides to become the exact opposite of what it once was (namefagging moral crusaders). Fucking idiots.
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
They do realize that anonymity is the antithesis of an account based system built around sharing personal information right? I can't even begin to comprehend what such a site would look like. It's like trying to breed fish that don't require water. I don't know who came up with this idea but he or she has no idea how social networking sites work. In fact I'm certain that either this is a joke or will never get off the ground. This is so stupid.
 

Lissa-QUON

New member
Jun 22, 2009
206
0
0
Though is this actually the real Anonymous planning this? Or is this someone pretending to be Anonymous in some elaborate trap to track down Anonymous members?

I mean really, this feels like some sort of elaborate trap.
 

Ryu890

New member
May 28, 2011
137
0
0
someonehairy-ish said:
"Welcome to the Revolution - a new social network where there is no fear... of censorship... of blackout... nor of holding back," it says. "There will be no more oppression. There will be no more tyranny. We are the people and we are Anonymous. We have arrived."

Does that remind you of anything?

Welcome to Rapture... where there is no fear of censorship... blah de blah.
And we all saw where THAT wound up. >> Geez.
 

Ryu890

New member
May 28, 2011
137
0
0
Hmph. I just have a hard time believing this is 'Anonymous'. Its gotten to the point where its just a title. Whoever the original Anonymous were, those who truly gave a care about what 'Anonymous' stood for, must simply be ashamed of what their name now represents.

The fact is, its INCREDIBLY easy to say "Oh yeah, I'm Anonymous! See how cool I am?" And its not all that much harder to come up with some 'I'm being oppressed' jargon that sounds pretty. But it doesn't mean anything if there isn't a true source of tyranny. This is the mindset of a child who points at anyone who tells them no, declares them the 'bad guy', and expects all his friends to go against them to.
 

Ryu890

New member
May 28, 2011
137
0
0
stewox said:
geizr said:
What a bunch of conceited, egotistical, self-serving, self-important, insular dick sandwiches! They go around slapping everyone in the face and then have the nerve to be perturbed when no one wants to be friends with them. What in the hell did they expect? Milk and cookies?

Of course, the whole thing will only result in another action by Anonymous that accomplishes nothing useful or edifying for anyone, not even Anonymous. It'll just be a bunch of Anons talking to themselves(which they already do by other means; so, the whole thing really is just wasted effort), cause I doubt any sane, rational human being would ever want to join their social network.
Breaking News: You're an idiot.
..............

Allright. I'll hear you out. How EXACTLY is he an idiot? Care to explain your actual points? Surely there's a REASON that he's an idiot?

As is, I thought his comment had some merit to it.
 

brainslurper

New member
Aug 18, 2009
940
0
0
RanD00M said:
They're known far and wide on the internet and in the real world
Well so is Al Qaeda.

Also, how is that going to work? Wouldn't it look like this?

Friends list:
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous

I suppose you could just go with usernames, and have the site not log IPs or emails...
 

stewox

New member
Dec 25, 2009
116
0
0
Awexsome said:
Activist is a pretty generous term at this point.

I'd call them dicks at best and terrorists at worst.
You're an idiot too, working for the government? Working for the satanists, or masons , or the banker elite , or the eugenists. hmmm ?


Remember when i mentioned cognitive dissonance , well there are many variations. One is problem-reaction-solution plus psychological trauma. The problem was false flag terrorism, the reaction was serious hype of terrorism as a global problem and wars, the solution is to give up your civil liberties and freedom for "security" which means => police-state. Psychological trauma was seeing the "problem" in immense horror, the 911 event "live" (forged digital composites) on TV

Post Effect Psychological Trauma is ofcourse the random association with the event many time after it has happened, "911" appears in many places around other stuff, for example it's the united states emergency number, every time you call emergency your mind consciously or subconsciously remembers the event adding more pressure. Trauma is what is the result of the long-term pressure, the every-day remembering and random associations in many places that keep person's mind always occupied with a tragic event, this is when traumatization becomes sufficient for a persons mindset to alter and he start's caving in, to believe and trust the government, such traumatized people do not detect the evidence that is flying over their nose, they are not able to think effectively; even if the government fakes the pictures of the (politically)"most wanted man" showing his "death", they'll still find excuses and nonsense elaborations that favor the government. That's why you can only be an idiot to further believe the officials, unfortunately masses are such, but many aren't idiots ofcourse understand overreactions, many people just don't give a thought to see it to question it, even if their life's perfect, they just do what they do and carry on, simply they don't care a whole lot as they see "oh the govt is surely doing someting about it, fine, carry on".


I just took an example, but this is exactly what's happening here, Anonymous is ofcourse viewed as "terrorists" - the govt said it, it's a mind trick, it doesn't mean they are terrorists to YOU, the corrupt GOVT speaks for them selfs, they(activists) are terrorists TO THE govt and private rulers/interests, but do you guys have BRAIN to realize they AREN'T "terrorists" to the PEOPLE.
 

stewox

New member
Dec 25, 2009
116
0
0
Ryu890 said:
stewox said:
geizr said:
What a bunch of conceited, egotistical, self-serving, self-important, insular dick sandwiches! They go around slapping everyone in the face and then have the nerve to be perturbed when no one wants to be friends with them. What in the hell did they expect? Milk and cookies?

Of course, the whole thing will only result in another action by Anonymous that accomplishes nothing useful or edifying for anyone, not even Anonymous. It'll just be a bunch of Anons talking to themselves(which they already do by other means; so, the whole thing really is just wasted effort), cause I doubt any sane, rational human being would ever want to join their social network.
Breaking News: You're an idiot.
..............

Allright. I'll hear you out. How EXACTLY is he an idiot? Care to explain your actual points? Surely there's a REASON that he's an idiot?

As is, I thought his comment had some merit to it.
Because he has no idea what Anonymous is, it's not a group, it's an ideal, an ideal that preserves and enpowers civil liberties and human rights. Anonymous is on our side, you treat Anonymous like an enemy because you don't understand it. 90% of comments to this thread are probably ignorant console kids posting nonsense.
 

Tentickles

New member
Oct 24, 2010
311
0
0
I think it's a wonderful idea.

Except for the fact that government hackers will try and get the user informations to find out "Just who Anon Members are."

but go them!
 

stewox

New member
Dec 25, 2009
116
0
0
Just saddens me to see such piss-poor state of escapist community when dealing with these sort of topics, bunch of sheeplets. That's a pretty powerful word, if you understand, hate to say it, but that's the sad reality.
 

stewox

New member
Dec 25, 2009
116
0
0
brainslurper said:
RanD00M said:
They're known far and wide on the internet and in the real world
Well so is Al Qaeda.

Also, how is that going to work? Wouldn't it look like this?

Friends list:
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous
Anonymous

I suppose you could just go with usernames, and have the site not log IPs or emails...
Why don't you , take everything you said ... and post them on their IRC and forums , you can actually help them, and you can actually get a proper answer. Insead of speculation, like this thread is of it in 98% of it.

And your al-kaida argument: Theories with most percentual chance form top to bottom.

- Doesn't exist(propaganda).
- CIA operation(false-flag).
- UAE sheik-funded operation(false-flag).
- Pakistan/Afghanistan/NATO/UN conspiracy(false-flag).

If you look closely, all of the theories point to a reality that is not real of what they speak on TV and anywhere else. There by there is 0% of it being real, and im not going to count thousands of evidence in this little post just for this to look more "authentic".

How do you know who dropped the bomb, when a car blows up, maybe it fallen from the sky , nobody knows for sure unless you're physically there. Those "terrorists" what you see on TV are just pakisani/afghanistani totally non-educated farmers, ofcourse they're revolting
Talibans are something completely different, those are just old-school islamists that fought to dispell stuff like wastern movies and games and wanted more strict islam rules. (that doesn't mean they are evil or a threat to anyone living outside the country in question)

They prolly all joined forces to attack the illegal invadors, the invadors without a reason. The invadors that invaded them on the basis of false claims, false accusations. When somebody does this to you it becomes your enemy, no matter if it was your friend in the past. Speaking of past, it was the US that gave TALIBANS the weapons to fight off the Soviet-Afghan war, isn't it all fun.

US are playing Alien Vs Predator game, US being predators, they purosely want the aliens to evolve (talibans) , then they go fight them in style to look like some badass winners, while humans(people) just happen to be in the way as bait, or as cheerleaders, as cannod fodder, or as unlucky contenders that kept the fight interesting and diversive.

In the end of it, it's not the US people controling or willing, it's a small group of private international interests that is actually EXPLOITING the USA. Anonymous actually want's to help YOU. It's obvious that the republic of USA does not represent the majority of population, thus when i say "US made this and that" i never meant the people, i always ment the corrupt perpetrators.

And here's ..by now an 3-year old quote by a former French artillery and intelligence officer:

"The truth is, there is no Islamic army or terrorist group called Al Qaida. And any informed intelligence officer knows this. But there is a propaganda campaign to make the public believe in the presence of an identified entity representing the 'devil' only in order to drive the TV watcher to accept a unified international leadership for a war against terrorism. The country behind this propaganda is the US and the lobbyists for the US war on terrorism are only interested in making money." -- Pierre-Henri Bunel
 

General Vagueness

New member
Feb 24, 2009
677
0
0
Looking at the site it seems they've already changed their tactics and goals somewhat. It so happens I was on 4chan yesterday and mentioned I didn't like social networks-- I prefer antisocial networks, which that site is an example of.