They didn't make a webpage, they replaced GaryHB's.Phyroxis said:Most of it. Hacking was getting and spoofing the initial e-mail. The rest was social engineering and childs play. Any middle-schooler can make a web page or a torrent.danpascooch said:Well let's see, they broke into their website, replaced it with their own, and infiltrated and published all of the private emails of the company.Phyroxis said:Isn't the whole point of this news story the fact that they can't find Anon? Or the Anon who are hacking? =PSennz0r said:I know that. Doesn't mean they couldn't come to an agreement with the part of Anonymous that is hacker.Phyroxis said:You can't hire an idea. Anon aren't all hackers. Anon is a collection of like-minded people tied solely around an ideology. Even then its loosely based. Some are hackers, many are not.Sennz0r said:Does anyone else feel a movie adaptation coming up?
In all honesty, I think the FBI should just hire Anonymous.
Besides, this isn't an example of hacking, honestly. Aside from the entry, its mostly just social engineering.
What part of this is "not hacking"?
I'm not saying they didn't do a lot, I'm saying that calling it hacking is downplaying the other skills at work here.
Honestly, what IS hacking if this isn't it? I understand something like DDOS involves running a premade program, that's not hacking. But they got into the site, edited it, and stole over 60000 emails, what would you consider hacking? Is anything less than the Skynet takeover considered hacking by you?
Remember, before they got the password from the admin, they had to GET INTO THE EMAIL SERVER to make it look like it was from them. Also, they hacked his Twitter.