Anonymous Threatens Internet With "Operation Blackout"

Agent Larkin

New member
Apr 6, 2009
2,795
0
0
Well it's official folks.

Were gonna have SOPA, PIPA and ACTA everywhere in about a week then.

If Anon does this it's just going to embarrass the governments of the world. And governments don't like to be embarrassed. So you can bet your life savings that if this goes through it will be all the excuse people need to police the internet.

Seriously Anon this is just fu**ing stupid.
 

SonOfVoorhees

New member
Aug 3, 2011
3,509
0
0
Let them get on with it. They say this crap but never follow through. Wasnt they supposed to shut down Facebook on Nov 5th? They didnt. They are like an attention seeking kid. They will shut the internet down and a few hours later it will be back again. Big whoop.
 

lostlevel

Senior Member
Nov 6, 2008
163
0
21
It still doesn't sound as annoying as annoying as Kony 2012... that and I'm working on the 31st so I think I'll cope - it would probably do me some good to not have as many distractions =]
 
Feb 28, 2008
689
0
0
Evidently unlike these people, my life does not revolve around or depend upon the internet. So even if they somehow managed to do this: why should I care? Boo-hoo I can't update my Facebook status or be bombarded with spam emails; and I might have to buy goods from real-world shops rather than Amazon.co.uk. Gimme a break...
 

Bostur

New member
Mar 14, 2011
1,070
0
0
FelixG said:
Shemming said:
How do I find out the IP's of sites? Just in case.
open up your command prompt, type "ping www.website.whatever"

and it will give you the ip address.

Though it should be noted that some websites wont let you direct connect to the IP, one such is the Escapist.
Some sites will block ping requests though. A more reliable method is to use the nslookup command:

> nslookup www.example.com


Many sites rely on the actual domain name as part of the URL, so typing in the IP in the browser will often not work. The simplest transparent way of using IP adresses directly is to add them to the hosts file, present on most OS'es. A small guide for Windows 7 here:
http://helpdeskgeek.com/windows-7/windows-7-hosts-file/

Adding this line for the www.escapistmagazine.com should bypass DNS queries completely and allow it to be used as normal:

209.34.224.73 www.escapistmagazine.com


In practice all internet applications use direct IPs to connect, which is why DNS services are needed. Using the hosts file simply tells the OS to use that information instead of looking it up on the net.
 

Storm Dragon

New member
Nov 29, 2011
477
0
0
They always post the technical details of how they plan to enact these things. Has it ever once occurred to them that this tells their targets how to protect themselves?
 

thepyrethatburns

New member
Sep 22, 2010
454
0
0
Feels a little cOLD in here.

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/forums/read/18.351177-Anonymous-Threatens-To-Shut-Down-Internet-Next-Month?page=1

And, in line with Aegix Drakan's post, I said a similar thing back then as well.

aegix drakan said:
Does Anon realize that the government could very feasibly just leave the internet down, blame Anon for killing the net, and then slip in some spying code or something while it's down, so that when the government "heroically" restores the internet, we will all be spied on or something?

*/tinfoil hat*

Honestly, Anon...this is just stupid.
thepyrethatburns said:
I would get into how this won't work and the issues with trying to hit the 13 DNS servers.

However, I'll just let you read about the last real attack which shut down 9 of 13 servers.

http://www.sans.org/reading_room/whitepapers/dns/secure-root-dns-servers_991

Honestly, I'd actually be tickled if they did it. What better way for the governments to take full control of the internet? All they'd have to do is keep the servers down while claiming that the attack did more damage than was advertised. (And how would Anonymous claim otherwise?) In the meantime, while the root servers are down, it wouldn't be too hard to either add a few steps to the process to help provide tracking information for who goes to what site or have the servers "accidently forget" the links between the DNS name and the IP address for troublesome sites such as Wikileaks. So, when they start bringing the servers up one at a time (to make sure their new steps work), the governments of the world now have both an internet more to their liking and a patsy to bear the brunt of everyone's wrath.

Hell, thinking about it, most people don't even really know how the servers work. It could be claimed that the servers were damaged beyond repair by the cyber-attack but, fortunately, a number of corporations (such as Comcast or AT&T) have volunteered their servers to be the new DNS servers. Most people would be so grateful to have their internet back that they wouldn't even notice an odd loss of net neutrality.

Honestly, this would be kinda funny in a "wow, you just managed to sink your own cause in one stroke" way.
(Someone then out-conspiracied me by pointing out "Who is to say that it isn't the government posing as Anonymous?" but the point remains.)
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
ITT: People who are STILL referring to anon as a singular entity. It really isn't. People should really learn that.
 

thepyrethatburns

New member
Sep 22, 2010
454
0
0
dogstile said:
ITT: People who are STILL referring to anon as a singular entity. It really isn't. People should really learn that.
*Shrug* They like to refer to themselves as a singular entity when it suits their purpose. Who am I to argue?
 

Dogstile

New member
Jan 17, 2009
5,093
0
0
thepyrethatburns said:
dogstile said:
ITT: People who are STILL referring to anon as a singular entity. It really isn't. People should really learn that.
*Shrug* They like to refer to themselves as a singular entity when it suits their purpose. Who am I to argue?
In which case, I am a ethereal being from outer space. You can now refer to me as that, because who are you to argue? ;)
 

Diddy_Mao

New member
Jan 14, 2009
1,189
0
0
I'm all for activism, protest and demonstration. But this type of behavior doesn't really make any kind of sense to me.

We think you're abusing the citizens, we feel you should be made accountable for what you have done.
To further that end we will abuse the citizens ourselves.
 

Dragonpit

New member
Nov 10, 2010
637
0
0
I guess I should be glad I'll be out of the house all of tomorrow, but that still leaves me with the lingering question of how long this will actually last. There are people out there that will be more than a little inconvenienced by this, should Anonymous actually pull this off.
 

CrankyStorming

New member
Mar 8, 2010
177
0
0
Does anyone know what time zone they're operating in? My internet went down at 9 o'clock GMT with a DNS error, so I assumed it was this.
 

CaptainKoala

Elite Member
May 23, 2010
1,238
0
41
Hey, I got an idea! The government wants to censor the internet because they think it's a reckless and lawless place, so we'll prove them wrong by shutting it down forcibly. That won't strengthen their cause, right?
 

Rariow

New member
Nov 1, 2011
342
0
0
Yeah. Anonymous does that, I loose all respect I had for them. Up until recently, I've seen them as internet freedom fighters. For a couple of months now I've seen them as way too enthusiastic and ocassionally douchey, whilst still mostly reasonable. This'll just push them into the category of jerks doing stuff 'cause they can. The internet IS Anonymous. Pretty much all their ideals are in effect on the internet. So they shut it down? Doesn't make much sense.

Anonymous, stop. You're making people see internet users as jerks, and you're hurting your own cause. You're hurting about 10% of the people you're protesting against, and about 75% of the people you're supposed to be protecting.

Sorry for that rant. Just had to get it out of my system.