Low Key said:
So a mask that has been around for centuries is used in a movie, and that means Warner Bros. owns it? How does that even work? But Anonymous are a bunch of idiots anyways, so I suppose this is fitting for them.
Daverson said:
On a side note, since when have Time Warner owned British history? Is it common for companies to hold IP rights over historical figures?
The Random One said:
Wait, you can have rights over that? Isn't it like a British folk symbol? Are they going to trademark maple leaves next?
I think the point of the article is that Warner Bros. happens to have a line of licensed Guy Fawkes masks, and that line is where most of the masks Anons end up buying come from. There are certainly other ones being sold; if I understand correctly, they've been around and in use in England since before
V for Vendetta was even written, and that's what Moore was referencing in the first place by giving him one. But they weren't really widely available in the US until Warner started licensing them as tie-ins for the movie. And since the vast majority of Anons are Americans, well, you do the math.
So that just leaves the question of why any of the licensees thought they needed to buy the license in the first place to make and sell them. Maybe they figured ? at the time ? that they weren't likely to sell very well without explicit (and definitely copyright-protected)
V for Vendetta branding on the packaging.
Also,
Greg Tito said:
That's why every good Anonymous member should steal the Guy Fawkes mask whenever they have a big protest coming up. It's the only way to be sure.
(Please don't steal. The above recommendation is for ironic purposes only.)
now I know why anarchists are so into theft.