And yet the two countries who are above America in violent gun crime barely touch video games, Columbia is one of them. Japan and the UK (and the rest of Europe) barely have any.
Logic!
Logic!
Yes, that is exactly my point.Johnson McGee said:You can't say based on that data that violent video games cause a decrease in violent crime. However, that data makes a very strong case that violent video games don't cause it to increase either.Innegativeion said:So what data is in direct contradiction of his assertions?
/Snip
I know I know. Correlations don't prove anything, but the burden of proof is on the accuser. The man blindly speaks nonsense.
My apologies for not spending an extensive amount of time on an unpaid internet forum post in which brevity is an optimal trait. I was mocking the man's beliefs by holding them up to scrutiny, pointing out a possible line of thought, and bringing it to a conclusion. I hope you'll forgive me for not wanting to write a damned essay on the subject.TheDoctor455 said:I am well aware of Swift's 'Modest Proposal', and the difference here is that he spent a great deal of time working on that, while you only spent a few minutes at most.
And even then, some people took the suggestion seriously.
deathbydeath said:My apologies for not spending an extensive amount of time on an unpaid internet forum post in which brevity is an optimal trait. I was mocking the man's beliefs by holding them up to scrutiny, pointing out a possible line of thought, and bringing it to a conclusion. I hope you'll forgive me for not wanting to write a damned essay on the subject.TheDoctor455 said:I am well aware of Swift's 'Modest Proposal', and the difference here is that he spent a great deal of time working on that, while you only spent a few minutes at most.
And even then, some people took the suggestion seriously.
Also, Vice City is over ten years old. Someone who played it when he/she was five can now legally drive, and we haven't seen an increase in running over prostitutes. And bonus points for the "murder for peace" angle. That's a good one.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wildfire#Human_involvement said:It was learned that suppression of fire in certain ecosystems actually increases the likelihood that a wildfire will occur and increases the intensity of those wildfires.
Yeah, first off it's all jokes and such, and then the gentleman in question is the one commanding the tank battalion.TheDoctor455 said:Don't care if you're joking or not. Not funny.deathbydeath said:Hey man, sometimes you got to be really, really sure.TheDoctor455 said:B) saying that we need to hunt down everyone in the Middle East and kill them?
And not okay to say.
Genocide, or even proposed genocide is not to be taken lightly.
Don't be ridiculous. Why would parents have any responsibility over what their children do in their spare time? Why should it be the parents' job to look at the explicitly clear age rating on the box and decide whether it's appropriate for their children? Why, that would imply such ridiculous notions such as that the parent had to, well... parent their children!Reyold said:See that? That text in bold? That's why there are morons gunning for regulating M-rated games, because the parents are too friggin' lazy to do it themselves, even though there is a detailed rating system, for a medium that is far better regulated than any other.Nowhere Man said:No, the disintegration of the family structure and disregard of parental responsibilities are whats to blame for rising murder rates. If there ARE any rising rates. Hasn't murder and violent crime as a whole actually gone DOWN over the years?
People astound me sometimes...
Funny.TheDoctor455 said:Don't care if you're joking or not. Not funny.deathbydeath said:Hey man, sometimes you got to be really, really sure.TheDoctor455 said:B) saying that we need to hunt down everyone in the Middle East and kill them?
And not okay to say.
Genocide, or even proposed genocide is not to be taken lightly.