I don't care if people smoke with two exceptions: smoking around children; smoking around hospitals.
Well, there is.blind_dead_mcjones said:consider that the exhaust fumes from cars and burnt petrol is at least 10 times as toxic/poisonous/damaging to you than 2nd hand smoke, those that live in the city are effectively surrounded by such fumes and breathing them in on near constant basis, and there are far more car users around then there are smokers
to which i ask, why are there never any demonisation about the use of all internal combustion engines (cars, buses, trucks, motorcycles, lawn mowers, chainsaws, hedge trimmers, portable generators, etc) in public areas despite the apparent increased health danger compared to standing too close to a smoker? and yet smokers are treated like lepers? just a thought.
Also this.Dfskelleton said:I think people are harder on smoking itself than those who smoke.
I understand that it's an addictive habit, and the people who smoke can't really help it, but that doesn't make smoking (not smokers) any less repulsive to me.
I've never had trouble breathing because a drunk or a fat person walked by.MetalDooley said:Fact is in Ireland alcohol abuse and obesity are the biggest health concerns yet no one is calling for massive price increases/bans on alcohol and junk foodDarknacht said:Hey if you have to tax something tax cigarettes.
I can't wait until we get a full public ban in the US, or at least in my state. Smoking in public should be illegal for the same reason wandering around throwing draino in people's faces is illegal.
People can quit smoking, my mum hates smoking and my dad used to smoke like a chimney.The Red Bastard said:I was recently reading a thread that asked the question: "what are your deal breakers?" I noticed there was a very large amount of people who claimed smoking was an instant deal breaker, no matter the person, some even going as far as saying they would not even befriend someone who was a smoker.
Now I don't smoke myself, but am I the only person who thinks people are way too harsh on smokers? I find it shocking that so many people are willing to shun someone over one habbit. It seems to me smokers are one of the relatively few groups people are willing to openly hate.
What are your thoughts on the topic?
eating add's emisions, infact being humans add to emisions that weren't there...so the argument is moot as well they still have yet to prove second hand smoking causes cancer so...I think unless you are standing within half an inch from me and have your mouth open near my cigarette you aren't being affected by my smoking.Cleril said:I shun people for eating fast food!Fanta Grape said:"I don't know why people smoke."
A common phrase uttered by the befuddled outsider with a simple answer. Because it makes them feel good. We don't shun people for having eating fast food but we do shun this sort of behaviour? Ridiculous. As long as it doesn't affect anyone else, I'm fine with it.
Bring me a casual smoker and I'll treat him like I would anyone else. Bring me a parent who feeds their kids McDonalds twice a week and I'll kick 'im down and slap some sense into him.
Although care obviously must be taken like making sure to do it in private, outside and far away from anyone who might dislike it.
Um...smoking does affect everyone else. And not just in the immediate area either. Smoking does add to emissions and it sticks to pretty much anything, leaving both scent and toxic chemicals wherever the stuff goes.
Even if one smokes in their own private location, they wouldn't be able to have anyone over, because then it would affect the visitor (third hand smoke).
Your logic be like Swiss cheese, holey.
Anyway, smokers are alright folks. They have personalities and shit like everyone else. If I had my way though I'd make whatever it is their smoking have a little container at the end where all the smoke is contained. That would certainly help the second hand smoke situation, no? Might put out the smoking utensil but hey, it's a business, and so we could use that to our advantage. Money money!
There is an amount of necessity in tools like that that balances it out, I believe. A car chews through a lot of gas, yes, but it is also a tool that is used to get from place to place more effectively than, say, a horse or a bike. While horses and bikes can easily get you from place to place, you simply cannot ride them extremely long distances with little work like you could a car. Personally, I believe that all these gas powered things are mostly transitional. We've proven that chainsaws and lawn mowers work with gas, let's find a more effective way to do it, not go backwards in technology because it's not working perfectly right now.blind_dead_mcjones said:here's a repeat from a previous topic regarding smoking (with a couple of minor alterations at the end)
consider that the exhaust fumes from cars and burnt petrol is at least 10 times as toxic/poisonous/damaging to you than 2nd hand smoke, those that live in the city are effectively surrounded by such fumes and breathing them in on near constant basis, and there are far more car users around then there are smokers
to which i ask, why are there never any demonisation about the use of all internal combustion engines (cars, buses, trucks, motorcycles, lawn mowers, chainsaws, hedge trimmers, portable generators, etc) in public areas despite the apparent increased health danger compared to standing too close to a smoker? and yet smokers are treated like lepers? just a thought.
You sir are very very misinformed to the point of spouting ludicrous bullshit. Whats next the world is flat?Blablahb said:Except that nicotine functions in a way that you don't feel anything, unless you're addicted. The relaxing effect due doesn't truly exist. Smoking doesn't relax, not smoking while addicted to nicotine makes one feel agitated, and smoking relieves that effect for a period of time.Fanta Grape said:For many people, it relaxes them and makes them feel cathartic. Not every smoker is an addict. They may like the smell and they may like the oral Freudian feeling.
Basicly If you do not know what you are talking about then do not hesitate to STFU.6.The pleasure feeling generated by nicotine is similar to that caused by cocaine and heroin, thus causing the addiction associated with the need to sustain high dopamine levels. Smoking has been reported to make you feel relax, calm, and alert.
7.Even concentration and memory are increased, but all nicotine effects will only last from anywhere between 5 minutes to 2 hours. To sustain pleasant the effects, a smoker would have to puff an average of 20 cigarettes in 24 hours.
8.Quick puffs by smokers produces a stimulating effect, whereas deep puffs produces a relaxing effect. This is because quick puffs produce low blood nicotine levels, whereas deep puffs depresses the passage of nerve impulses, producing a mild sedative effect.
Hygene and healthy are not the same thing. The smells from smoke are not a hygene issue the same as the perfumes in soap are not or even better perfume/cologne sprayed onto you.zehydra said:Well, smoking sure as hell isn't hygenic.