Are teachers allowed to kick you out of the classroom for looking at your phone?

Baby Tea

Just Ask Frankie
Sep 18, 2008
4,687
0
0
Michael Fahey said:
I am a college student, and I have a teacher who is hard core against cell phones in the class.
Yup, she can.
It's college, dude. Not high school.
I've heard of people fired for similar actions. That's how she goes, sometimes.
 

Continuity

New member
May 20, 2010
2,053
0
0
Michael Fahey said:
I am a college student, and I have a teacher who is hard core against cell phones in the class. (that and she just acts like all the students are children) When ever someone's phone goes off in their back pack, she writes their name down and when the next test comes around she subtracts points from them.

The other day my phone was on vibrate so she couldn't hear it, but it just kept going off so I took it out to shut it off. She caught me and asked what I was hiding, and told me to show the class. I put up no resistance and gave her no trouble, I just said "my phone was going off so I was shutting it off" and showed that it was indeed my phone. She then pointed to the door and said "good bye" I was baffled and asked "Are you really kicking me out?" and she angrily said "Yes, I have a zero tolerance on phones" once again I didn't fight this and just left. She also marked it as if I was absent for that day of class

I am just curious, are teachers actually allowed to do that? To subtract points from tests and kick students out and mark it against their attendance? I have the class tomorrow, I am not sure if she is gonna do anything else when I get there.
Basically they make their own rules, you're there on sufferance, you follow the rules or you leave.

Is it really so hard to follow the rules? are they asking you to do handstands or balance spinning plates?
 

ChaoticLegion

New member
Mar 19, 2009
427
0
0
Michael Fahey said:
I am a college student, and I have a teacher who is hard core against cell phones in the class. (that and she just acts like all the students are children) When ever someone's phone goes off in their back pack, she writes their name down and when the next test comes around she subtracts points from them.

The other day my phone was on vibrate so she couldn't hear it, but it just kept going off so I took it out to shut it off. She caught me and asked what I was hiding, and told me to show the class. I put up no resistance and gave her no trouble, I just said "my phone was going off so I was shutting it off" and showed that it was indeed my phone. She then pointed to the door and said "good bye" I was baffled and asked "Are you really kicking me out?" and she angrily said "Yes, I have a zero tolerance on phones" once again I didn't fight this and just left. She also marked it as if I was absent for that day of class

I am just curious, are teachers actually allowed to do that? To subtract points from tests and kick students out and mark it against their attendance? I have the class tomorrow, I am not sure if she is gonna do anything else when I get there.
I've seen a lot of people responding to this thread stating things such as "you should turn your phone off"... however such a response does not answer the questions asked. The question clearly states what is to happen if such a "rule" is broken, not whether rules should be broken to begin with.

OT:

1) With regards to asking you to leave the classroom, college is something you pay for (directly or via taxes, which is irrelevant)and as such you have certain rights in recieving said education. It is possible for the college to set up rules as to when such rights can be denied (such as after excessive or extreme negative behaviour), however for a minor infraction such as looking at a phone (providing it did not in-fact disrupt any portion of the class - eg. loud ringtones) or even where you are attempting to remove a disruption (such as a vibration) then removing you from the class will be an over-step and should certainly be challenged.

2) With regards to marking you as absent on the register, doing such a thing is not only a potential violation of Health and Safely (as you are in-fact present in the building at the time and as such this could have an adverse affect and lead to possible injury during a fire) but it is also a gross violation of the use and purpose of the register. You did in-fact attent the lecture and as such your punctuation and attendance should not suffer adversely for your actions during such a lecture. Behaviour is to be recorded and used to inform furture employees if a reference is required, but any such behaviour should not be allowed to tarnish a completely seperate category of attendance as this is also something that will be required if a reference is requested before employment.
As such, and as with the first point above, this is certainly a miss-use of both the register and the position of the teacher and such actions should certainly be challenged.

3) With regards to editing exam marks based on personal behaviour in class, acting in such a manner is not only damaging to a students grades in providing an unfair reflection of their understanding and capabilities, but it is also a gross misuse of power by the teacher. Such actions will certainly be against regulations and as such is a step that should certainly be challenged. If such a challenge was to fail at your school, it is certainly a practice that is best brought to the attention of the governing educational body for your area.


I understand that my post is somewhat longer than the others in this thread, but I hope due to this, that it goes some way further in helping you with this issue.
 

buhee

New member
Jul 6, 2010
41
0
0
I can understand that in school. Not the marking you as absent, but the making you leave the class.
In college we're considered young adults, so teachers no longer took our phones off of us if they went off, they might send us out of the class if we were texting or something, but again, not marking us absent, because that would be lying. Also, some college students received EMA which was dependent on class attendence, and no teacher, regardless of how much they hated phones, wanted to be the douchbag that took away your bus/lunch money for the week.

In uni, if your phone goes off, all that happens is you feel a bit embarrassed and hurry to turn it off. The lecturers don't have the power to remove it from you, because after all, uni students are for all intents and purposes adults. So it would be nothing short of theft. So you do get people texting and stuff in lectures, but at the end of the day, if the're paying to not pay attention to the lectures then the joke is on them.
 

dvd_72

New member
Jun 7, 2010
581
0
0
While I do think she's being a little harsh, I can immagine it would be annoying for a teacher to have students constantly distracted by thier phones.

Still, is it so hard to just turn the thing off before heading to class?
 

Danny Ocean

Master Archivist
Jun 28, 2008
4,148
0
0
Michael Fahey said:
I am a college student
You already knew that she had zero tolerance for phones. Turn it off completely before you go into her lesson.

I'm not on her side- she was being too harsh there, but you should really learn to deal with unreasonable people in positions of authority. You're going to meet a lot of them.
 

snowfi6916

New member
Nov 22, 2010
336
0
0
If you knew that she had a zero tolerance policy for cellphones, why didn't you turn your cellphone completely off before her class? That's what I would have done, and it would have saved you all this trouble. I don't think it is too much to ask for someone (especially a college student, so an adult basically) to turn their damn cellphone off for 50 minutes. Unless you are expecting an emergency phone call from your mom who is in the hospital, then turn it off. If you are expecting an emergency call, let her know and take it outside if you get the call. Simple.

On your side though, I do think you should tell the dean about her marking you absent. She can take points off a test to be sure, but most colleges have policies against professors marking you absent when you were clearly there.
 

TheDarkestDerp

New member
Dec 6, 2010
499
0
0
It's their class, they can kick you out for pretty much whatever they want within their university's allowed parameters.
 

tendaji

New member
Aug 15, 2008
378
0
0
Troublesome Lagomorph said:
Boot you from the class and mark you absent? Bullshit. Some people don't seem to remember who pays for their overblown salaries at the end of the day, it seems.
As for the actual zero tolerance on phones? Yeah, so? I always figured it to be a standard. Every school I've been on confiscates your phone for ~a month + for it ringing or being out during school hours.


Lunch time included.
So 23k-84k annual salaries are overblown salaries for teachers who can teach up to several hundred students per semester?
 

WeAreStevo

New member
Sep 22, 2011
449
0
0
Michael Fahey said:
I am a college student, and I have a teacher who is hard core against cell phones in the class. (that and she just acts like all the students are children) When ever someone's phone goes off in their back pack, she writes their name down and when the next test comes around she subtracts points from them.

The other day my phone was on vibrate so she couldn't hear it, but it just kept going off so I took it out to shut it off. She caught me and asked what I was hiding, and told me to show the class. I put up no resistance and gave her no trouble, I just said "my phone was going off so I was shutting it off" and showed that it was indeed my phone. She then pointed to the door and said "good bye" I was baffled and asked "Are you really kicking me out?" and she angrily said "Yes, I have a zero tolerance on phones" once again I didn't fight this and just left. She also marked it as if I was absent for that day of class

I am just curious, are teachers actually allowed to do that? To subtract points from tests and kick students out and mark it against their attendance? I have the class tomorrow, I am not sure if she is gonna do anything else when I get there.
If it's outlined in her syllabus then yes. She can do that. I've seen teachers kick out classmates for surfing the web, being on their phones, texting etc.

It's considered a disruption of class and therefore she can kick you out so long as she outlined her policies in the syllabus.

I just put my phone on silent (not even vibrate) for that very reason.
 

YuriRuler90

New member
Mar 3, 2010
47
0
0
What the hell? Do none of you have jobs that require you to be on call?
Kids?
Elderly parents?

Yes, I turn my phone on vibrate. It is annoying to be interrupted by a loud, obnoxious ringtone in the middle of a lecture. But I leave it on in case of an emergency.

I've had to leave several lectures in just this past year because I've had calls that something was happening that immediately required my attention. One day my mother got into a serious car accident and was taken to the hospital in critical condition. One day my mother-in-law (who has MS) fell out of her wheelchair and couldn't move. One day one of my officers was hit by a fucking car during a patrol.

Add that to the fact that I'm in charge of four other officers, and it means I have to field calls at all hours of the day.
 

Vrach

New member
Jun 17, 2010
3,223
0
0
Michael Fahey said:
I am just curious, are teachers actually allowed to do that? To subtract points from tests and kick students out and mark it against their attendance? I have the class tomorrow, I am not sure if she is gonna do anything else when I get there.
Nope, neither. She can kick you out/mark you down if it's during a test obviously (on suspicion of cheating), but during normal class? Hell no. Report that shit to the dean and get her stupid ass disciplined (and anyone she ever marked down, including you, refunded their points)
 

RaikuFA

New member
Jun 12, 2009
4,370
0
0
Char-Nobyl said:
RaikuFA said:
exacly, if theyre tenured they can abuse their power,
*facepalm* It's like you looked at my post and somehow failed to read every word except 'tenure.' And apparently you think that 'tenure' is the same thing that 'diplomatic immunity' is in the Lethal Weapon series.

RaikuFA said:
you see, teachers are nothing more than idiots
That's usually a sign of an informed opinion on its way. I'm looking forward to this.

RaikuFA said:
who'll turn the other way at beatings,
Nope. Because that's kind of illegal.

RaikuFA said:
take their students money themselves saying its extra tuition and can get away with it because theyre professers,
Nope again. It's hilarious that you think college professors become immune to the law once they get tenured. Because what you just described? That's robbery. Like, actual robbery.

RaikuFA said:
they can do whatever they want.
You know, normally I'd explain how tenure works, but apparently you think it's a literal license to kill (and everything below that), so I'm not going to bother. I know wasted effort when I see it.

RaikuFA said:
i never went to college, i dont need to, i dont need to be around more people who are just going to treat me like crap after ive paid them to do their job
It's always hilarious to stumble across barely-literate knuckle-draggers who think that higher education has nothing to offer them. It's even more hilarious when said people also think that they know anything about anything, like, for instance, tenure.

You know what I think your post translates to? "I couldn't even get into Rutgers." And considering what you've said so far, I'm not surprised.
actually, rutgers has a horrible program to help disabled people

besides im just telling you what ive experienced my whole life from school. if theres one thing i learned besides math, writing and sciences its that teachers abuse their power all the time and from what ive read here it dosent get better in college. why should i go some place where i know im not going to get an education at all and just have a miserable time
 

QuantumT

New member
Nov 17, 2009
146
0
0
Darkside360 said:
Sorry but she was justified. Phones have no place in the classroom. Nothing is worse than during a lecture in my culinary classes than having some god awful rap start playing really loud.
And someone having god awful rap start in class and someone merely glancing at their silent phone are clearly equivalent.
 

Supertegwyn

New member
Oct 7, 2010
1,057
0
0
THAC0 said:
Fiad said:
Skandis said:
Wait, so your entire class consists of people that can't even turn off their cell when they're clearly in a position where they're not meant to use it.

Please tell me you're just pretending you're in college to appear cooler...
People are idiots when it comes to phones. Even if they are told they need to have them off they will not because whatever text they get from their BBF Jill is going to be so important and lifechanging that the rules don't apply.
pretty much this. a thousand times this.

when i get out of the Navy and get a job as a professor i am going to rule that if i hear or see your phone, you will automatically fail the next test.

the nursing classes at the college i went to had a similar rule: we see your phone, or hear it, don't bother coming back because you just failed the whole class.
That is incredibly extreme and could be illegal. Don't ever do that.

OT: You shouldn't have your phone on, but her reaction was extreme.
 

Zorg111

New member
May 16, 2011
15
0
0
There is the magical power that profs have that the universities called Tenure. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tenure_%28academic%29

Unfortunately for cell phone users the more likely that a prof has tenure, the more likely they do not use phones on a regular basis and don't sympathize. Unlike one of my profs who's cell phone goes off in class regularly.
 

kickyourass

New member
Apr 17, 2010
1,429
0
0
I'm pretty sure you can report her for that.
My teachers never kicked anyone out but they would give you detention if you used it during class.
 

DaJoW

New member
Aug 17, 2010
520
0
0
Not here they aren't but since I don't know what country you're from, I can't really comment. You really should have specified in the OP or at least in your profile. Here the teacher would most likely face some form of administrative punishment for doing that.

I'm going to assume you're from the US though, so probably. From an outside perspective it seems authority figures have the right to do as they please over there - I don't mean to troll but that's the impression I've gotten.