I haven't played the game, but can anyone tell me if it's safe to say that Catwoman is not as, jiggly, as some of Team Ninja's female cast members?
They show a great number of aspects that present an overall troubling tone.GreatTeacherCAW said:And they present it as a bunch of goons calling a woman a *****.
Not convinced. Is it sexist when the enemy calls your male character a "************"? Same thing.LilithSlave said:They show a great number of aspects that present an overall troubling tone.GreatTeacherCAW said:And they present it as a bunch of goons calling a woman a *****.
A tone that generally respects the male members of it's cast more than female ones.
That last sentence of yours really hit home. I'm a sad panda now. Stupid society...Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:Couple of very obvious problems with this one:
1. It's the BAD GUYS that are calling her a *****. It's the BAD GUYS beating her up. That means the game is taking a bunch of sexist assholes and saying, "See these guys? Don't be like them!" And hell, even if BATMAN called her a *****, the game still wouldn't be sexist. And here's why:
2. It's not sexist to call a single woman a *****. It's only sexist if you say ALL women are bitches. I mean, lets face it...Catwoman is not exactly Mother Teresa. But guess what? It's OK for Catwoman to be a total ***** without implying sexism. Just because SHE'S a *****, that doesn't mean that all women are bitches.
3. I'm sure these thugs have nothing but compliments for Batman, then? Wait, I forgot. Only women can be victims of sexism.
I really hate living in a culture where all of this is not EXTREMELY obvious.
Maybe it is, maybe it isn't, but even if there are elements of sexism, give credit where it's due, to the source material: the comics.BreakfastMan said:So, Kotaku recently posted an article how Arkham City might contain some elements of sexism. Take a look. [http://kotaku.com/5851358/batman-arkham-citys-weird-*****-fixation] What do you all think? Is the overuse of the word "*****" in this context just simply unfortunately lackluster writing? Or is it something more?
Some takes on this from others:
http://filmcrithulk.wordpress.com/2011/10/19/goddammit-video-games-the-first-few-hours-of-arkham-city-is-lots-of-fun-but-super-duper-sexist/
http://gameoverthinker.blogspot.com/2011/10/will-arkham-city-be-this-years-other-m.html
That claim has already been given a rebuttal to:Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:1. It's the BAD GUYS that are calling her a *****.
HULK BET THAT SOME PEOPLE MAY TRY TO DEFEND THIS HORSESHIT DISPOSITION BY SAYING IT?S OKAY BECAUSE THE ONES SAYING IT ARE THE ?BAD GUYS.? WHICH ISN?T ACTUALLY TRUE BECAUSE LOTS OF THE SECURITY GUARDS AND A GOOD GUY FROM LAST GAME ALL CHIP IN WITH THE ?*****? TALK JUST AS MUCH AS EVERYONE ELSE. (2) AND IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THE WAY BATMAN OR CATWOMAN RESPOND TO ANY OF THIS THAT MAKES HULK THINK OTHERWISE? IS THERE ANYTHING ABOUT THE WAY IT?S SHOWN TO MAKE HULK THINK IT?S ANYTHING MORE THAN SEXIST FUN MEANT TO ELLICIT A FEW PAINFUL LAUGHS FROM AN AUDIENCE WHO DOESN?T KNOW ANY BETTER?
Congratulations on ignoring EVERYTHING ELSE HE TYPED. This doesn't strengthen your argument.LilithSlave said:That claim has already been given a rebuttal to:Frozen Donkey Wheel2 said:1. It's the BAD GUYS that are calling her a *****.
snip