I think the third assassins creed will be about desmond, but the series has subcumbed to kingdom heart syndrome (making a ton of spin off games that contribute nearly nothing while pushing back the third game even farther)
Assassin's Creed III Location
- Thread starter Lyiat
- Start date
Recommended Videos
You should consider playing Napoleon Total War, before I played that game, my knowledge of that era was spotty, at best.Baradiel said:
Nikolaz72 said:
There will be no Feudal Japan, The Writer for the AC series said they are only going to set the next one where Desmond can realistically have an ancestor so its Europe, East Asia, and Maybe America only.
OT:I'm thinking The French Revolution for AC3 then a Brotherhood style sequel where you kill Napoleon.
I like the idea of feudal Japan as a setting but I don't really like the idea of Desmond being part Japanese.
What about setting AC3 in 1920s New York and make the main character a member of the Italian mafia, it's totally believable that Desmond could have an ancestor from there.
What about setting AC3 in 1920s New York and make the main character a member of the Italian mafia, it's totally believable that Desmond could have an ancestor from there.
Speaking of revolutions, the 1905 and 1917 Russian revolutions would be excellent for the series. I know they've already done a comic about it, but a full blown game would be amazing.Stalydan said:
If not that then I'm gonna have to go with Stayldon and say industrial revolution England.
No, you're quite right, he was shot from the mizzen-mast platform (don't know the naval nomenclature of those things) of the Redoubtable by a French marine. He died about four hours later, so hooray for another cutscene idea!Baradiel said:
I think that mission would be along the lines of manning guns for the first bit (taking out the Bucentaure or other lead French ships), then boarding another ship, capturing a colours while clobbering Frenchmen (sorry as an Englishman, I found a perverse pleasure in typing that!), then noticing a marksman line his sights against the admiral finding a musket, aiming... only for it to misfire (possible and very plausible, if not probable), hence Nelson gets hit. Then finding some other way of killing the marksman and returning to the Victory.
Yeah, that could so work.
Brotherhood and Revelations are part of the series not just spin-offs, they move the main story along just Like AC and AC2, and they add new features like the Execution streaks or Assassin Apprentices, Unless your talking about the shitty handheld games I don't see your point.genericusername64 said:
ASLO its Desmond, succumbed, and further.
I regarded that with a bit of horror as well...Catchy Slogan said:
Baradiel said:
I would agree there, though the central European campaign is quite off (names aside), though I love how the central commanders and leaders for each of the factions actually do resemble the historical figures (unlike Empire Total War which was waaaaaaaaaaay off). Especially the French commanders, Napoleon, Ney, Davout and Murat (however much I want to punch the fucker). Unfortunately, there were only two Prussian figures of note (Blucher and F-W III, Pr L-F v Prs was a little off, while I don't know what Pr F-K v. H-I actually looked like).Darth_Dude said:
One thing that annoyed me, though, playing the Prussian campaign was 'Massenbach was a 4 star?! the man was an incompetent twat!'
Anyway, be sure to get the Penninsular Campaign expansion as well, because that one's quite faithful as well.
That would be the most boring end mission ever... you put up his wallpaper! *hrk*superdelux said:
Really? You should watch that Disney training montage video we talked about. It teaches people not to black out like that.Catchy Slogan said:
What did Brotherhood add to the series that couldn't have been added in revelations? Revelations could've had multiplayer and guild missions. From a story point of view Brotherhood had Ezio run in circles, nothing happened that couldn't have been dlc. Desmond's part was the only part where anything happened, and that was about an hour of real time.superdelux said:
As long as the location does put us into a time where guns are well...used instead of swords then its fine. Unless of course the game would be set amlost entirely and mainly in modern times. Because then at least the series feels like its been waiting to build up towards that.
Even though that would mean less of the animus. But I expect that the writers and developers will come up with something really smart actually. Possibly playing in the same city, but with 200 years apart?
Even though that would mean less of the animus. But I expect that the writers and developers will come up with something really smart actually. Possibly playing in the same city, but with 200 years apart?
still think that is rather wierd, desmond currently have a arabian ancestor and a italian ancestor, whats next? brittish? japanese?
I agree so much! Japan would be amazing.
Hope they don't do Victorian London, such a depressing time in England with boring as shit architecture.
Hope they don't do Victorian London, such a depressing time in England with boring as shit architecture.