Autistic Xbox Player's Mother Admits He Cheated

AuronJ90

New member
Jan 30, 2011
2
0
0
By going to the media and using this boy's autisim to garner sympathy, the mother is basically telling the son that it is acceptable for him to use his autism to manipulate people. Microsoft did the right thing by not backing off and labeling him a cheater because he is a cheater regardless of any disability he might have.
 

K_Dub

New member
Oct 19, 2008
523
0
0
Freakin' stupid situation. Why don't moms just learn things proper? Buncha dummies.
 

Sephychu

New member
Dec 13, 2009
1,698
0
0
"Hey, if I lie, I can get two days of media cover!"

What was her reasoning for lying? I wouldn't be surprised if it was something similar to the above.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
Flare Phoenix said:
Snip snip-

Check the law: ignorance of it is no excuse for breaking it. Assuming the kid didn't know what he was doing was wrong (which, as I should point out, has nothing to do with the fact the kid is austistic; any young kid probably wouldn't know what cheating is...), the mature thing to do would've been to say "Well I didn't know that was cheating but I do for next time".

Now assuming the kid was incapable of understanding what he did was cheating, it would be up to the mother to make that call for him. The article quite clearly stated the mother warned her kid against what he was doing, so your argument really holds no water.

Don't get me wrong, there are some rules I don't agree with. For example, I believe it is disgusting down here in Australia gays are not allowed to get married. However, I fully believe that breaking the law is grounds for just punishment for doing so.

I'm so tired of people like you trying to put people with disabilities on some kind of pedastal. I've seen plenty of cases where people, without any form of disability, have done something with their Xbox they weren't aware was considered cheating. Why should this austistic kid get his points back over those other people?

You cannot have one set of rules for one person, and another set of rules for everyone else. As I've said before, the fact this kid was autistic has less than nothing to do with this case; any young kid probably wouldn't understand what this kid did would be considered as cheating. It would be up to the mother to prevent her kid from doing it, and if the mother also didn't know then that sucks for the kid, but by no means does that mean he should get his points back.

*sigh* If a mentally retarded person does something wrong, I expect them to get some form of punishment. If a normal person does something wrong, I expect them to get some form of punishment. Obviously, there would be differing circumstances in some cases (what pleading insanity is for, afterall). However, no one should be allowed to do something wrong and get off scott free.

But hey, it's good to see the mother's desperate attempt for sympathy has worked on you. Any young kid would probably look at this and say "Well I don't understand what I did was cheating", but just because the kid is austistic you feel he should be given a free ride.

Hell take it even further, you punish a little kid for anything and chances are they're going to have no idea what they did was wrong (until you punish them for it enough times, they get the picture).
My entire point was about agency. Ignorance of the law, and the incapability to understand the law are two different things. Do we punish a train for crashing and killing people? No, because it's a frigging train. If the autistic kid is capable of understanding the situation and just hasn't learned to, then yes, punishing him actually accomplishes something. But if he just isn't going to understand anyway, then there's no real point other than upholding some grand abstracted idea of 'Justice' or personal vengeance.

Why? Why do people cling to these ideas of objective morality? It's all just a construct. There's just no need to have stringent un-bendable codes. Each situation is different, the more adaptable the system the better off it is. Now I don't know if you have this in Australia, but in America we have a thing called 'jury nullification'. This happens when the entire jury finds the law to be lacking in the particular situation, they vote the defendant innocent, even though he or she is guilty under the law. To clarify, this isn't a term that just describes what sometimes happens in spite of the law, IT IS PART OF THE LAW. The law is bendable because it does not arise out of some sort of eternal metaphysical code of right and wrong, but out of the needs of society.

But you don't seem to understand that I'm making a more general point. In this situation, the mother did cheat, and the kid may very well know what he did was wrong, in which case he should have been punished because it means that he won't do it next time. But that being said, I feel more sympathy for the kid because of his situation. Really the mother is the one who is really morally culpable, and she's the one who will know better for next time.

One final thing. People with disabilities should get special treatment. The special treatment should just be proportional to the disability. You wouldn't say a paraplegic is a bad person for not pulling someone out of a burning car would you? They can't. A person with Tourette's should be excused for shouting obscenities. Etc. Etc. If the autistic person doesn't understand what they're doing, they should be excused as well. Notice I am saying "doesn't understand what they're doing" which is different from simply being ignorant of the law.
 

cheezwizz

New member
Jan 10, 2011
2
0
0
Drinking game: take a shot for every time someone accuses the kid of cheating and not the person who actually did the cheating, which was not the account owner.
 

D_987

New member
Jun 15, 2008
4,839
0
0
cheezwizz said:
Drinking game: take a shot for every time someone accuses the kid of cheating and not the person who actually did the cheating, which was not the account owner.
The kid clearly had some active involvement because he had to give his account details away...

Do semantics really matter?
 

MGlBlaze

New member
Oct 28, 2009
1,079
0
0
I have an Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the mother now fills me with disgust. It is true that Autistic people often require assistance with some things, but she was using her son's Disability to gain undue sympathy for both him and herself.

What's worse, she was aware of what happened from the very start and now that the cat is out of the bag, she is still trying to paint them positively.

Parasite.

Also, the kid shouldn't get the one-month free membership and a new gamertag.
 

Jules57

New member
Jan 27, 2011
32
0
0
What did we learn today, 1 kids do lie, 2 parents will protect there kids and 3 its funny to watch media sensationalize a story only to have it back fire and make them look stupid :)
 

UnnDunn

New member
Aug 15, 2006
237
0
0
Kortney said:
He gets a new gamer tag and a free month on Xbox live? Why?
That isn't a reward. Anyone who signs up a new gamertag gets a free month of XBL Gold access.

Anyone who gets their gamerscore reset can sign up for a new account and start over with a free month. Their old account will still carry the Cheater tag.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
Kortney said:
He gets a new gamer tag and a free month on Xbox live? Why?
When you make a new account you get a free month of live and a new gamertag. Take note if you don't care about achievements and your specific online handle. Anyone can do it. All you need is an email address. He has already been set to 0 so if he didn't have the year subscription or anything like that (avatar gear doesn't transfer and game saves either) he would lose nothing by doing this. He hasn't gotten anything anyone else who has been reset can get.
 

squid5580

Elite Member
Feb 20, 2008
5,106
0
41
ReiverCorrupter said:
Flare Phoenix said:
Snip snip-

Check the law: ignorance of it is no excuse for breaking it. Assuming the kid didn't know what he was doing was wrong (which, as I should point out, has nothing to do with the fact the kid is austistic; any young kid probably wouldn't know what cheating is...), the mature thing to do would've been to say "Well I didn't know that was cheating but I do for next time".

Now assuming the kid was incapable of understanding what he did was cheating, it would be up to the mother to make that call for him. The article quite clearly stated the mother warned her kid against what he was doing, so your argument really holds no water.

Don't get me wrong, there are some rules I don't agree with. For example, I believe it is disgusting down here in Australia gays are not allowed to get married. However, I fully believe that breaking the law is grounds for just punishment for doing so.

I'm so tired of people like you trying to put people with disabilities on some kind of pedastal. I've seen plenty of cases where people, without any form of disability, have done something with their Xbox they weren't aware was considered cheating. Why should this austistic kid get his points back over those other people?

You cannot have one set of rules for one person, and another set of rules for everyone else. As I've said before, the fact this kid was autistic has less than nothing to do with this case; any young kid probably wouldn't understand what this kid did would be considered as cheating. It would be up to the mother to prevent her kid from doing it, and if the mother also didn't know then that sucks for the kid, but by no means does that mean he should get his points back.

*sigh* If a mentally retarded person does something wrong, I expect them to get some form of punishment. If a normal person does something wrong, I expect them to get some form of punishment. Obviously, there would be differing circumstances in some cases (what pleading insanity is for, afterall). However, no one should be allowed to do something wrong and get off scott free.

But hey, it's good to see the mother's desperate attempt for sympathy has worked on you. Any young kid would probably look at this and say "Well I don't understand what I did was cheating", but just because the kid is austistic you feel he should be given a free ride.

Hell take it even further, you punish a little kid for anything and chances are they're going to have no idea what they did was wrong (until you punish them for it enough times, they get the picture).
My entire point was about agency. Ignorance of the law, and the incapability to understand the law are two different things. Do we punish a train for crashing and killing people? No, because it's a frigging train. If the autistic kid is capable of understanding the situation and just hasn't learned to, then yes, punishing him actually accomplishes something. But if he just isn't going to understand anyway, then there's no real point other than upholding some grand abstracted idea of 'Justice' or personal vengeance.

Why? Why do people cling to these ideas of objective morality? It's all just a construct. There's just no need to have stringent un-bendable codes. Each situation is different, the more adaptable the system the better off it is. Now I don't know if you have this in Australia, but in America we have a thing called 'jury nullification'. This happens when the entire jury finds the law to be lacking in the particular situation, they vote the defendant innocent, even though he or she is guilty under the law. To clarify, this isn't a term that just describes what sometimes happens in spite of the law, IT IS PART OF THE LAW. The law is bendable because it does not arise out of some sort of eternal metaphysical code of right and wrong, but out of the needs of society.

But you don't seem to understand that I'm making a more general point. In this situation, the mother did cheat, and the kid may very well know what he did was wrong, in which case he should have been punished because it means that he won't do it next time. But that being said, I feel more sympathy for the kid because of his situation. Really the mother is the one who is really morally culpable, and she's the one who will know better for next time.

One final thing. People with disabilities should get special treatment. The special treatment should just be proportional to the disability. You wouldn't say a paraplegic is a bad person for not pulling someone out of a burning car would you? They can't. A person with Tourette's should be excused for shouting obscenities. Etc. Etc. If the autistic person doesn't understand what they're doing, they should be excused as well. Notice I am saying "doesn't understand what they're doing" which is different from simply being ignorant of the law.
First and foremost how is MS supposed to keep track of millions of people with all their disabilities? Or let everyone else know that we are supposed to treat them proportionally because of it? Would it be better if on his gamertag "excuse my achievements being out of order because I have autism." This is of course after we all are subjected to a battery of psychological exams before we are allowed to sign up to Live in the first place. Since you can't have people claiming they have a disability to get this special treatment in the first place. Or maybe MS could add a new type of gamer. Right now there is stuff like underground and family and such. Why not make a new server and call it something like Special? Then we can keep them away from the "normal" players and they can do whatever they want. Lets just take away one of the last places where people with mental disabilities are treated equally and fairly. Where they aren't subjected to being put in the special class and being told how different they are. I mean that is the only fair way to make sure they are protected from the "normals". And the "normals" are protected from them. Afterall that is why we have Special Olympics and Special classes. They can't keep up with the "normals" and the "normals" shouldn't have to slow down for them. So lets just keep them seperated all together.

I don't know about you but to me that sounds quite offensive. And by far worse than having you achievements taken away and getting smacked with a label of exactly what you are. A cheater regardless if you know better or not.
 

ecoho

New member
Jun 16, 2010
2,093
0
0
mrdude2010 said:
ecoho said:
I kinda dont blame her and in truth the kid should have his achivments wiped but the cheater tag was a little much. I mean when you tink about it the kid probily didnt know what his friend was doing was cheating when he was offerd it(i know a few kids in general who are a bit too trusting) and lets face it the majority of parents dont know anything about games.
i'm sorry but i have no sympathy for him whatsoever. cheating is one thing i can't stand, especially when it comes to earning things like rankings and armor pieces. it pisses me off when people gain them through cheating, and i personally think that profile, and any others created on that xbox (you could still get around it and create a profile elsewhere and move it, but oh well) should get the cheater label. even if he was "too trusting" he should've gotten the achievements for himself instead of even thinking of letting someone else do them for him
its a game man if he wants to get something cool looking and he cant but his friend can more power to him i dont apove of cheating but in truth WTF does it matter achivments mean absolutly nothing so why is this even slightly a big deal? ill never understand why they even put them in there if you cant use them why bother getting them?
 

ComradeJim270

New member
Nov 24, 2007
581
0
0
MGlBlaze said:
I have an Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the mother now fills me with disgust. It is true that Autistic people often require assistance with some things, but she was using her son's Disability to gain undue sympathy for both him and herself.

What's worse, she was aware of what happened from the very start and now that the cat is out of the bag, she is still trying to paint them positively.

Parasite.

Also, the kid shouldn't get the one-month free membership and a new gamertag.
As someone with Asperger's... amen to this. The behavior of this woman was absolutely asinine.
 

SIXVI06-M

New member
Jan 7, 2011
245
0
0
That woman has taught her son no virtue in her actions. Not only will this affect him adversely in life- it could even affect the wider community of people with similar learning disabilities - from example to simply a bad reputation. Sympathy card or not - cheating is cheating, a stealing is stealing, killing is killing, and so on - it does not matter what afflicts you, wrongdoing is called that because it is WRONG.

I am glad that at least a civil and positive resolution was offered on Microsofts part - unfortunately this does make the parent and child look worse. But of course, thankfully the child gets a new gamertag and hopefully the family will walk away having learned a valuable lesson on virtue.
 

SIXVI06-M

New member
Jan 7, 2011
245
0
0
MGlBlaze said:
I have an Autistic Spectrum Disorder and the mother now fills me with disgust. It is true that Autistic people often require assistance with some things, but she was using her son's Disability to gain undue sympathy for both him and herself.

What's worse, she was aware of what happened from the very start and now that the cat is out of the bag, she is still trying to paint them positively.

Parasite.

Also, the kid shouldn't get the one-month free membership and a new gamertag.
It was just a very decent and civil PR move on MS's behalf. Also decent in the fact that MS has no need for the family to be reeling from this chain of events - it's just a gaming community, the child hasn't committed anything viciously heinous - just something stupid and dishonest - they paid the price and got a bad reputation already, there is no doubt the kid and the mother will suffer publicly depending on how well-known this case has become; if not, they should count themselves lucky, lick their wounds and do well to never repeat it.

Last thing MS needs is people raising pitchforks and torches on a witchhunt on their behalf over something that can be so easily rectified with a gesture of kindness and reconciliation. More power to MS either way and capitalising on stupid peoples mistakes - bravo MS really.
 

DTWolfwood

Better than Vash!
Oct 20, 2009
3,716
0
0
dammit she should have adamantly stuck with the lie! i mean Denial isn't just a river in Egypt! hehehe