Was going to point this out myself.Oskamunda said:Notice how none of this piracy seems to be hurting Avatar's financial success...
Most the movies did very well financially. Kick-Ass under preformed, but can't imagine piracy is to blame.
Was going to point this out myself.Oskamunda said:Notice how none of this piracy seems to be hurting Avatar's financial success...
Indeed.Ruzzian Roulette said:The fact that Kick-Ass is the number 2 most pirated movie kinda makes me happy.
Makin' me proud, fellow geeks, makin' me proud.
Don't forget the energy used to ship the DVD's everywhere, as well as ship all the components that made the DVD to their factories. It creates jobs I guess, but definitely selling it uses more energy; all joking aside that is.shaboinkin said:I know you're joking bout that global warming, but I'm wondering. Which takes more energy? Manufacturing millions of DVDs/Blu Rays along with their boxes, and their colorful covers, or downloading it off a couple thousand computers from around the world?se7ensenses said:So now that this figure is released, how long until James Cameron is addressing congress to put a stop to piracy? Piracy causes global warming!
Economically friendly on the production side (budget) or on the viewership side (ticket prices)?Celtic_Kerr said:sure his movie is environmentally friendly, but now James has to come out with an economically friendly movie
I heard it was a pile of Platinum bricks.Souplex said:I'm sure James Cameron is crying into his pile of money.
My biggest thing with this is that the majority of the people downloading it HAVE seen it (the statistics are there) and that they DL it for posterity rather than shell out 20-30$ for the DVD just to see it again. People have their 2tb hard drives and nothing to fill them with, so they see a hot seed and jump onboard for the hell of it. I'm not endorsing it whatsoever, and especially considering how many people actually watched it to how many downloaded it would be an interesting survey in itself.Diamondback One said:Me too, friend.Subzerowings said:I'm just going to throw it out there: I hate piracy.
For the thread at hand: Why can't people shell out a few dollars to see it legally? They worked hard on it and in some cases spent millions of dollars making it, why deprive them of their cash? All those figures of piracy I see could help make a bigger budget for a sequel. I mean come on, you have to at least be interested in the movie to want to pirate it, so something caught your attention. And this isn't just for Avatar, all the other movies on that list that were pirated millions of times. Some of them didn't make a lot of cash and really could have used the help.
(PS: I wonder how people who pirate would feel if they made something popular, only to have it pirated as well. Bet it'd feel pretty bad.)
In this instance "money" is used as a blanket term for things of value.Romidude said:I heard it was a pile of Platinum bricks.Souplex said:I'm sure James Cameron is crying into his pile of money.
"YES, and I wear my top hat and monocal with pride too!"ImNotReallySane said:AAAARRRRGGGGG!!!!!
i wear my eye patch with pride!
"Its nice to see someone stand up against something they despise, its refreshing."Subzerowings said:I'm just going to throw it out there: I hate piracy.
I don't know how many people on this site pirate games, movies, music, etc. but I really can't stand it.
If you like a movie then you buy it.
I don't care if someone has a great quality pirated version while the movie isn't even out yet, I would never dowload that, regardless of the movie.
I really hate getting on the moral high horse, especially when I'm talking about something that's obviously wrong, but I just can't stand it.
It just makes more sense to start doing more digital releases for such things. Here is a kicker though. Everyone wants to talk about environmental impact of this or that, and shortages of this or that... here is one for you.... worldwide bandwidth shortage. Some people put it as soon as 2015.thedeathscythe said:Don't forget the energy used to ship the DVD's everywhere, as well as ship all the components that made the DVD to their factories. It creates jobs I guess, but definitely selling it uses more energy; all joking aside that is.shaboinkin said:I know you're joking bout that global warming, but I'm wondering. Which takes more energy? Manufacturing millions of DVDs/Blu Rays along with their boxes, and their colorful covers, or downloading it off a couple thousand computers from around the world?se7ensenses said:So now that this figure is released, how long until James Cameron is addressing congress to put a stop to piracy? Piracy causes global warming!
That figure is huge though. If he made a single dollar off each download, he'd have made another 16 million. That's crazy. Now obviously lots of those people who pirated it also bought it, but I always like to think "what if they made a dollar..." when I see stats like that.