Way to only quote the part of the song that fit your needs. The song is about how war isn't a glorious thing like so many young people think. As a soldier fighting in a war you have to do things that will most likely keep you up at night. The song goes on to say that all people see once the soldier got home are his medals and scars, not the inner turmoil of seeing and doing the things that he saw and had to do over therethis isnt my name said:Rise against until I hared "Hero f war"
I kicked in the door
I yelled my commands
The children, they cried
But I got my man
We took him away
A bag over his face
From his family and his friends
They took off his clothes
They pissed in his hands
I told them to stop
But then I joined in
We beat him with guns
And batons not just once
But again and again
A hero of war
Yeah that's what I'll be
And when I come home
They'll be damn proud of me
I'll carry this flag
To the grave if I must
Because it's a flag that I love
And a flag that I trust
She walked through bullets and haze
I asked her to stop
I begged her to stay
But she pressed on
So I lifted my gun
And I fired away
The shells jumped through the smoke
And into the sand
That the blood now had soaked
She collapsed with a flag in her hand
A flag white as snow
Becuase thats totally what all soldier do isnt it.
I beg to differ. Bad Religion frequently offers an intellectual challenge to the irrationality of religion frequently. There are also scientific undertones since the lead singer and one of the songwriters has a PhD in evolutionary biologypapakapp said:I suddenly like system of a down a lot more now.
RE: the theme of the thread, I don't like republicans, George Bush, or country music, but when the Dixie Chicks went off on Bush, I would have quit listening to them if I ever had listened to them in the first place. I also lost respect for Green Day after "american idiot" and I lost respect for Eminem after "mosh". Pretty much whenever a singer gets political in their music I loose respect for them.
But for a band to sing about how cold rationalism is the death of real living, that is exactly what music is imho. Music is real living and the exact opposite of cold rationalism. Science is cold rationalism and not real living.
Came here to post this as well.Worgen said:I used to like system of the down until I heard the song science, well heard the song and actually listened to the lyrics, one of the lines is "science fails to recognize the single most potent element of human existence, letting the reigns go to the unfolding is faith" to me that sounds like they are saying, "science sucks, yay faith" and faith is one of the more retarded things that people have, so fuck em.
Not quite political, but I love Guster, everyone of their songs, up until their latest CD which was extremely religious and just a turn off.WouldYouKindly said:I beg to differ. Bad Religion frequently offers an intellectual challenge to the irrationality of religion frequently. There are also scientific undertones since the lead singer and one of the songwriters has a PhD in evolutionary biologypapakapp said:I suddenly like system of a down a lot more now.
RE: the theme of the thread, I don't like republicans, George Bush, or country music, but when the Dixie Chicks went off on Bush, I would have quit listening to them if I ever had listened to them in the first place. I also lost respect for Green Day after "american idiot" and I lost respect for Eminem after "mosh". Pretty much whenever a singer gets political in their music I loose respect for them.
But for a band to sing about how cold rationalism is the death of real living, that is exactly what music is imho. Music is real living and the exact opposite of cold rationalism. Science is cold rationalism and not real living.
Also, what about bands that were ALWAYS political? I can agree that I lost respect for Green Day when they jumped on the political bash Bush band wagon, but if someone has been critical or commented on politics for 20 years before what then? Is it that you just don't listen to them.
Also, incredibly, this came up.
![]()
Also,(last one I swear) System of a Down is political, they are just normally subtle about it.
When you have to test a hypothesis you have to be rational and potentially cold about it but science is about the love, if you didn't have love for the world then why would you want to figure out how it worked, you wouldn't you would just do your little thing and wouldn't even think of ask the why and the how. You probably wouldn't even wonder what love was, you would just accept that it was there.papakapp said:Then you would make a horrible scientist. Science is unbiased and clinical. Based on your most recent post in this thread I can Objectively say that you are neither objective nor clinical on this issue as evidenced by your use of the subjective words :"love" and "friend".Worgen said:Ugh, its the thread that wont fucken die. The only people that think science is cold and rational are people that don't know science, I know science, science is a personal friend and has much more love then any faith.papakapp said:I suddenly like system of a down a lot more now.Worgen said:If they also didn't repeat "science has failed our world" over and over again then I might be more inclined to agree, plus it doesn't help that the song is damn catchy and I cant even think about these stupid lyrics without the damn thing getting stuck in my head. I liked it allot better before I knew what the words said.SonicKoala said:How would you explain their line "Why cry when angels deserve to die?" in "Chop Suey"? Taking lines out of context aside, perhaps "Science" is just a commentary on the short-comings of science? How its ostensible promise of leading us into a new and better world is slightly undercut when you consider the horrors humanity has had to endure ever since the advent of the modern age? Its undervaluing of the more spiritual, intangible qualities inherent in human existence?Worgen said:I used to like system of the down until I heard the song science, well heard the song and actually listened to the lyrics, one of the lines is "science fails to recognize the single most potent element of human existence, letting the reigns go to the unfolding is faith" to me that sounds like they are saying, "science sucks, yay faith" and faith is one of the more retarded things that people have, so fuck em.
Just throwing that out there, feel free to agree or disagree. Honestly, System aren't even that good in my opinion, so you not listening to them certainly isn't much of a loss as far as I'm concerned. That being said, if there's one thing I'm not a fan of, it's rash decisions!
RE: the theme of the thread, I don't like republicans, George Bush, or country music, but when the Dixie Chicks went off on Bush, I would have quit listening to them if I ever had listened to them in the first place. I also lost respect for Green Day after "american idiot" and I lost respect for Eminem after "mosh". Pretty much whenever a singer gets political in their music I loose respect for them.
But for a band to sing about how cold rationalism is the death of real living, that is exactly what music is imho. Music is real living and the exact opposite of cold rationalism. Science is cold rationalism and not real living.
This shows two things:
First, despite what you say you believe, you clearly are not "scientific" all the time. (science is Latin for knowledge, and you are not operating on knowledge at this time, you are operating on emotion).
Second, despite what you say about subjective things like "faith", you have a great deal of faith in the usefulness of the scientific method. There are two ways to deduce that the scientific method is a useful method of inquiry. Either you admit that you have faith that the scientific method is useful (as I do), or else you use the scientific method to prove that the scientific method is useful. That would be circular reasoning. So the first one is naked faith, and the second one is covert faith.
I'm all for clinical objectivity when it is warranted. I do it all the time. But I don't have faith in it. That is just another faith based system with its own zealots who, if they are true zealots, they will remain in self denial until they see the error of their ways.
(don't argue with me on the point about proto-religious self denial or you will just be proving my point. I would recommend that you objectively attempt to dismantle the argument from the regress problem [the argument that says that science can't be used to prove itself as a valid method of inquiry] if you want to have a sophisticated argument.) ...of course, nobody has been able to dismantle that for hundreds of years...
Plus, I like music and other arts. They have more meaning when there is more to life than rationalism.
Arluza said:i like to listen to Rise Against. But I won't buy anything they sell because they support PETA.
Yes, but the point is this arguement has been done to death all voer the internet and simply didn't need to be brought up again. Yes, OBVIOUSLY Tarja is a trained Soprano and Anette is a pop music singer. I LIKE THEM BOTH! Now back to your inflammatory Troll-hole before I put the boots to you.NameIsRobertPaulson said:I'll take that challenge.WarDialler said:I used to like Nightwish until I found out Tuomas Holopainen has some sort of twisted hardon for Walt Disney. Also if anyone starts that whole Tarja vs Anette thing again I will come round your house with Kevin Smith and Jason Mewes and beat the snot out of you, ala J&SBSB. Fact.
Tarja was an operatic singer doing symphonic metal. Annette Olzon is a pop singer. If you can't tell the vast musical difference between Ghost Love Score and Amaranth, there is no hope for you.
It's like Justin Timberlake suddenly being the lead singer of Disturbed. He's not a bad singer, and neither is Olzon, but the sound is off. Way off.