Bethesda Sues Interplay Over Fallout MMO

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
Mercanary57 said:
Fuck. You. Bethesda. You didn't even create the franchise... you just made an okay version of it. /angry Interplay Studio's fanboy rant
You're forgetting that Bethesda bought the franchise. They have all rights to it, and so Interplay shouldn't be making a game about it.
 

Ausir

New member
Sep 5, 2009
71
0
0
New details have surfaced. Turns out there are actually two lawsuits - one over Fallout Online, and the other over Fallout Trilogy and other re-releases of the original Fallout games. See:

Bethesda vs. Interplay - more detail [http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/User_blog:Ausir/Bethesda_vs._Interplay_-_more_detail]
 

MercenaryCanary

New member
Mar 24, 2008
1,777
0
0
Lord Krunk said:
Mercanary57 said:
Fuck. You. Bethesda. You didn't even create the franchise... you just made an okay version of it. /angry Interplay Studio's fanboy rant
You're forgetting that Bethesda bought the franchise. They have all rights to it, and so Interplay shouldn't be making a game about it.
Actually, if I remember right, Interplay has the rights to make mulitplayer Fallout games, while Bethesda has the rights to make single player games. Since Interplay is making an MMO, not a singleplayer, as the contract agreed, then this whole law suit shouldn't be happening.
 

Ausir

New member
Sep 5, 2009
71
0
0
Actually, if I remember right, Interplay has the rights to make mulitplayer Fallout games, while Bethesda has the rights to make single player games.
Bethesda owns the whole franchise and only licensed the MMO rights to Interplay under certain conditions that Interplay failed to meet.
 

userwhoquitthesite

New member
Jul 23, 2009
2,177
0
0
I hope this kills the fallout MMO once and for all. I think the fallout series is too good to be dumbed down into an MMO. Do we really need BoS dailies to collect laser pistol drops from the nearby raider camp? Or water delivery jobs?

i just dont see an MMO having the same impact story-wise as a single player game can, nor does it sound like the proper atmosphere/quality would be present (judging from the popular MMO's ive had experience with)
 

Ausir

New member
Sep 5, 2009
71
0
0
I hope this kills the fallout MMO once and for all.
It won't, it will just mean that ZeniMax/Bethesda will develop it instead of Interplay.

I think the fallout series is too good to be dumbed down into an MMO
Well, I thought it was too good to be dumbed down into Oblivion with Guns. After that, I don't really care that much.
 

DrunkWithPower

New member
Apr 17, 2009
1,380
0
0
Up Good News creek without a Bad Thing paddle??? Hahaha, but no.... no, they are going to get monogamy on this one.
 

Halfbreed13

New member
Apr 21, 2009
1,066
0
0
Well then.

Because god forbid the people who made the first games make another. Fucking Bethesda.
 

Mirrorknight

New member
Jul 23, 2009
223
0
0
Meh. Interplay needed money in a bad way. Bethesda came up to them told them they wanted to buy the rights to Fallout. Interplay said they would, but they were working on the MMO for it at the moment. Bethesda said "Oh, that's cool. How about we just buy the rights, but you get to keep MMO rights to it as long as you've made good progress on it by a couple of years from now. If you don't, then we get the full rights." Interplay said yes.

It's been a couple years and a few months change now, and it doesn't seem any further along then it was then.

Sad to say, but this isn't any type of evil ninja lawyer legal loophole sorcery on Bethesda's part to evilly gain control of the Fallout MMO rights. They put down the ground rules in black and white when they made the agreement. Hell, Beth even gave them about an extra half a year. Interplay didn't even need to have it -done-, just have had decent progress on it. They haven't, so an agreement's an agreement. If hardcore Fallout fans want to blame someone, blame Interplay for agreeing to the deal in the first place.
 

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
Mercanary57 said:
Lord Krunk said:
Mercanary57 said:
Fuck. You. Bethesda. You didn't even create the franchise... you just made an okay version of it. /angry Interplay Studio's fanboy rant
You're forgetting that Bethesda bought the franchise. They have all rights to it, and so Interplay shouldn't be making a game about it.
Actually, if I remember right, Interplay has the rights to make mulitplayer Fallout games, while Bethesda has the rights to make single player games. Since Interplay is making an MMO, not a singleplayer, as the contract agreed, then this whole law suit shouldn't be happening.
After a bit of research, Interplay only has rights to the MMO, but a certain stage of development in the game had to be reached by the start of April 2009. Interplay didn't meet that requirement, and therefore has no right to the game.

On top of that, they've failed to meet other requirements as well. For example, changing the name of 'the Fallout Trilogy' mwhich implies their (false) ownership of Fallout 3.
 

Kiutu

New member
Sep 27, 2008
1,787
0
0
Fallout seemed pretty MMO-able really, since it would have likely been similar to one and two and making it an MMO does not seem at all a hard thing to do.
Sure they had the right to, but Bethesda seems mean for this, and well...I dont like my favorite developer being mean.
 

hansari

New member
May 31, 2009
1,256
0
0
Baby Tea said:
Good, says I.
A Fallout MMO is a terrible idea. Make something else.
I second that. I can't really see the Fallout universe working as an MMO...I mean putting VATS in pvp?
 

WhiteTiger225

New member
Aug 6, 2009
1,039
0
0
This is why I laugh at the people who say "Fallout 1-2 were masterpieces and were far superior to Fallout 3!" Because whenever they say this... I point to Bethesda's *****... I mean interplay... and their current financial situation, not to mention they made Fallout 3 (Only 70% complete) and never got to releasing it because their game sales didn't do all that good...

I have to say... I hate Halo 3 (The Vanilla Yogurt of the FPS Icecream Market) but I have to say the same thing for it... how do you claim a game is god awful when the game has made more money in a year then your most cherished game has made in a decade? I mean, to make that much money they obviously did SOMETHING right.

I hope to see a Fallout MMO that puts you in Fallout 3 style gameplay, minus the Pipboy (You would start off as a basic wastelander, so sorry, but no VATs for you!) remain classless save for deciding your starting stats and skills, and an open world just like Fallout 3 with so much to explore, maybe expand on the idea of crafting and turn caves, buildings, etc into instances.
 

Aries_Split

New member
May 12, 2008
2,097
0
0
WhiteTiger225 said:
This is why I laugh at the people who say "Fallout 1-2 were masterpieces and were far superior to Fallout 3!" Because whenever they say this... I point to Bethesda's *****... I mean interplay... and their current financial situation, not to mention they made Fallout 3 (Only 70% complete) and never got to releasing it because their game sales didn't do all that good...

I have to say... I hate Halo 3 (The Vanilla Yogurt of the FPS Icecream Market) but I have to say the same thing for it... how do you claim a game is god awful when the game has made more money in a year then your most cherished game has made in a decade? I mean, to make that much money they obviously did SOMETHING right.

I hope to see a Fallout MMO that puts you in Fallout 3 style gameplay, minus the Pipboy (You would start off as a basic wastelander, so sorry, but no VATs for you!) remain classless save for deciding your starting stats and skills, and an open world just like Fallout 3 with so much to explore, maybe expand on the idea of crafting and turn caves, buildings, etc into instances.
By your logic you are a fan of the Millionaires and Hannah Montana.

And Crack Cocaine.
 

QuirkyTambourine

New member
Jul 26, 2009
1,193
0
0
Well I hope this means Bethesda is worried that V13 will be bad and that they're developing their own MMO based on the Fallout Universe.

Right?

...guys?
 

hypothetical fact

New member
Oct 8, 2008
1,601
0
0
Aries_Split said:
WhiteTiger225 said:
This is why I laugh at the people who say "Fallout 1-2 were masterpieces and were far superior to Fallout 3!" Because whenever they say this... I point to Bethesda's *****... I mean interplay... and their current financial situation, not to mention they made Fallout 3 (Only 70% complete) and never got to releasing it because their game sales didn't do all that good...

I have to say... I hate Halo 3 (The Vanilla Yogurt of the FPS Icecream Market) but I have to say the same thing for it... how do you claim a game is god awful when the game has made more money in a year then your most cherished game has made in a decade? I mean, to make that much money they obviously did SOMETHING right.

I hope to see a Fallout MMO that puts you in Fallout 3 style gameplay, minus the Pipboy (You would start off as a basic wastelander, so sorry, but no VATs for you!) remain classless save for deciding your starting stats and skills, and an open world just like Fallout 3 with so much to explore, maybe expand on the idea of crafting and turn caves, buildings, etc into instances.
By your logic you are a fan of the Millionaires and Hannah Montana.

And Crack Cocaine.
No. By his logic Hannah Montanna and Cocaine appeal to market needs so they sell well. No matter how much, "this game is so deep and wonderful and is better than everything else" the fanboys do, interplay fails at meeting market or in this case legal needs so they can become a footnote on Wikpedia.