Bethesda Teases... Something
- Thread starter Andy Chalk
- Start date
Recommended Videos
well this may be a slightly far-fetched way of thinking but barbed wire evokes World War One a bit. You know, it being just about everywhere around the trenches. In fact some of the most used battlefield tactics of WW1 all involved barbed wire. No machine gun nest was complete without it. The early 20th century music thing also helps the theory.
WW1 is a setting almost completely unexplored by games so this might just be wishful thinking on my part but wuldn't it be awesome? Think about it.
WW1 is a setting almost completely unexplored by games so this might just be wishful thinking on my part but wuldn't it be awesome? Think about it.
Aye im guessing the same thing but i jumped to the second world war, vinyl records and barbed wire do push to that time period either the first or second world war.C117 said:
Wolfenstein game maybe?
However I'm willing to bet it will be something horrible like Fallout ONLINE.
However I'm willing to bet it will be something horrible like Fallout ONLINE.
You are not alone. I can't deny the far superior dialogue and conversations in New Vegas, but everything else about it was bland, strangely-empty, and off-putting compared to F3.Mr Cwtchy said:
Crossing fingers for New IP/Fallout 4 made by Obsdian.
Aaaaaaaand if its just Fallout 4 NOT made by Obsidian... gtfo or skip straight to Fallout 5 for all I care.
Aaaaaaaand if its just Fallout 4 NOT made by Obsidian... gtfo or skip straight to Fallout 5 for all I care.
Air to G-String 3 in 1 is all I get out of it without breaking my eyes or my brain.
Maybe I'll try later today. After more coffee. Just a cup. Or two. Or three. Or a dozen.
Maybe I'll try later today. After more coffee. Just a cup. Or two. Or three. Or a dozen.
With complementary Horse Armor. They learned their lesson, honest!Zachary Amaranth said:
OT: No clue what it could be, but what I got out of it was an auto-starting and auto-looping video that thankfully muted itself on opening. >.>
I wouldn't really call myself a Bethesda fan though. I like a game or two that they've published, and Skyrim was fun for a little bit, but I've never been able to get into any of the other Elder Scrolls games or the Fallout games they've published.
You have exactly two examples and no more. That isn't enough data to objectively qualify which company would make a better Fallout the next time around. People are split on which game they like better and Obsidian had a Hell of a pair of shoulders to stand on in the second iteration of the modern Fallout series.Freezy_Breezy said:
Meaning, Fallout 3 had to be newly created from scratch in all but the original theme. Anything they kept in had to be dramatically redesigned and a significant amount of resources went into creating a proprietary game engine. Obsidian was then given these resources with Bethesda as their publisher as well as their guidance. When you're not creating a game from scratch then you've got a hell of a lot more freedom (resources: Money, People, Time) to put more effort into polishing the existing engine and developing the story.
So the remaining question is which company would be better at redesigning the entire game world for the next generation of console? Bethesda is the one for that. There is practically no other company that is better at creating a sandbox for developers and modders to run wild in. However, there's no harm in hiring a few of the best writers that New Vegas game (Chris Avellone is practically gold right now).