infohippie said:
I've already implemented that solution in my life. The last Bioware game I bought was Dragon Age 2. I haven't bought a Bioware game at all since then because DA2 was so very, very shit, and then I waited to hear what ME3 was like with the result I never bothered buying it either. I still reserve the right to complain about their shit characters because once upon a time I loved their games, mostly for the characters and the writing.
Then just play old games and indie published stuff. I hear good things from Lisa but I haven't played it yet.
Frankly I find it disingenuous the idea that this is merely about a shit character. Because the way you decry it out, all the right wingnuts were screaming about 'tokenism' in Dragonspear in the exact same way. Frankly this is the
first time I've heard about this ... and frankly I'll use the same commentary I used during Dragonspear... that I know people who are pretty open about being trans because they legitimately want to educate people on the trans experience they run into. They give talks about being trans, they sometimes help counsel parents who might be having difficulty understanding it.
I can't speak to the quality of how well that's encapsulated in the text, but having played Dragonspear ... meh. If I was a cleric in D&D who can call down godly power and see everything as a test of faith and a quest, then I can see how it wouldn't faze them in the slightest to being kind of an open book. Make sense as per the base games, make sense in world.
But regardless of
all that stuff ... if your same criticism is the same criticism for EVERY OTHER CHARACTER, then just flat out not buy it. The reason why people scream about this stuff and nothing ever gets done is precisely because
people are still giving them money. Their objective is not to deliver a good game, their objective is to make money and
merely look like they want to deliver a decent game.