Lol at the grumbling.... Would you now hate me for saying that I only own a 360? I do see your point though. If another console was getting content that was being held back for mine I wouldn't be best pleased about the situation. I haven't had any of the DA:O DLC yet though because I'm still plodding through Mass Effect 2 & Fallout 3 trying to get 100% on both.BehattedWanderer said:Sorry for dropping that bomb, but it just gets under my skin, when things like that happen. While I do readily blame EA for several things, and am quite prepared to blame this on them too, I'm more inclined to blame Microsoft for cheating. Sure, you could pay them off so that the other consoles loose out on sales, but a competent group would want them to compete, to see the actual comparison data. Cheating bunch of...*grumbles incoherently for a bit*Rancid0ffspring said:Woah... Chill Winston! It's business my friend. Look at Call Of Duty: MW2 for example, 360 gets the new maps before anyone else because again MS have paid for them. In the instance of DO:O, I believe the blame would mainly reside with EA anyway, it would have been their decission to take up a deal to exclusivity
ninjadFlamezdudes said:Jade Empire 2? They said last year they were thinking of doing it.The Gentleman said:Not likely to be a beta for TOR (I hear that they are still a long ways off till release).
Both Dragon Age 2 and Mass Effect 3 still have at least another year before they'll start to display the game.
Likely some big DLC or a totally different annoucement.
Haha why would I hate you for it? My, how petty the world has made us that mere ownership of something might imply that someone would hate you. Though, it is an interesting conundrum. I understand exclusivity, but touting exclusivity when it's supposed to be multi-platform is a bit like demanding to be 45m ahead of everyone else in the 50m dash, and that's what bugs me about that thought. For all their one-upmanship, Sony and Microsoft really should be competing on the same ground, and not trying to trip the other competitor up. Both are fine systems in their own rights, with plenty of attributes for each, but when something is equal for both of them, then they should really play it fair with it, and see where the preference is for the gamers themselves. All we're looking at right now is the hissy fit in the middle of a public area for a spoiled child trying to get its way, with a parent obliging for now but soon might give the child a spanking and send them to their room. Oh, and you should really try some of the DLC--Warden's keep was pretty good, with a nice choice to make, while Shale could be...uhh...well, I didn't really use him, but you might find him really useful. Good luck with your completions, man.Rancid0ffspring said:Lol at the grumbling.... Would you now hate me for saying that I only own a 360? I do see your point though. If another console was getting content that was being held back for mine I wouldn't be best pleased about the situation. I haven't had any of the DA:O DLC yet though because I'm still plodding through Mass Effect 2 & Fallout 3 trying to get 100% on both.BehattedWanderer said:Sorry for dropping that bomb, but it just gets under my skin, when things like that happen. While I do readily blame EA for several things, and am quite prepared to blame this on them too, I'm more inclined to blame Microsoft for cheating. Sure, you could pay them off so that the other consoles loose out on sales, but a competent group would want them to compete, to see the actual comparison data. Cheating bunch of...*grumbles incoherently for a bit*Rancid0ffspring said:Woah... Chill Winston! It's business my friend. Look at Call Of Duty: MW2 for example, 360 gets the new maps before anyone else because again MS have paid for them. In the instance of DO:O, I believe the blame would mainly reside with EA anyway, it would have been their decission to take up a deal to exclusivity