Caps are not an issue, once you get used to them.Garak73 said:I wonder how these bandwidth caps will affect digital distribution.
I know right? if your not a pirate you sound like a moron saying im a PC gamercaspertjuhh said:thank god for not being a pc gamer!
I'm a PC gamer...ionveau said:I know right? if your not a pirate you sound like a moron saying im a PC gamercaspertjuhh said:thank god for not being a pc gamer!
DRM is never sensible. It doesn't stop pirates and it causes inconveniences for the buyer, however small or rare they might be. Waste of money and time for everyone, just stop it already.LTK_70 said:What, is the standard response to any article that says "This game has this DRM" that it "hurts players, feeds pirates, not gonna buy"? Haters gonna hate. This DRM system looks like the most sensible choice for an AAA developer and publisher, from what I've seen so far. And yes, it will still be pirated, so what?
Snipped the rest. You might not want to advocate that here, simply because of the hardline stance the Escapist takes on piracy.shemoanscazrex3 said:Totally
That's an overreaction if I've ever seen one.Nutcase said:EA isn't going to get a cent from me.
Yes, I read that, but this should be a non-issue because this DRM shouldn't exist in the first place. There WILL be a better version out there on torrent networks within hours, or at the worst, days, after the game releases.ravenshrike said:Except it's not 5 installs. It's playing the game from the same authentication key on more than 5 different computers within a single 24 hour period. If you're playing the same multi-gigabyte install game on 6 different computers with a 24 hour period you ahve some serious problems you might want to get checked out.TheXRatedDodo said:You've said all that I was going to say, so I feel perfectly justified in quoting your post for truth.Dorkmaster Flek said:I love how we've gotten to the point where a limit of 5 installs and periodic online verification is considered "generous". And by love, I mean hate. Oh, how "generous" of Bioware to allow me to play the game I legally purchased! That's so considerate of them, you know?
Five installs and periodic verification is not generous, it's taking the fucking piss.
From my PS3 and who the fuck knows?burningdragoon said:I don't know where you got that from, but it's not true. And if it is true, then what game was I playing?unwesen said:DA:O had DRM on the PS3 that required you to be connected. In fact, savegames were online only... a very effective and amazingly annoying thing to do.
Maybe there are different versions out there. I couldn't. Since you're the second (or first, I'm going by the order I reply to stuff) to mention that, I actually switched on my PS3 and checked.BehattedWanderer said:Way to go, Bioware, in making a decent attempt to be effective yet unobtrusive. As long as it doesn't push you out of the game if you're not logged on, it doesn't seem too terrible.
Really? So, the only time my game saved was when I was connected, which was only when I was buying/installing the DLC? Odd, I remember being able to just open up my save files at any time.unwesen said:DA:O had DRM on the PS3 that required you to be connected. In fact, savegames were online only... a very effective and amazingly annoying thing to do.Jatyu said:Hell it's not "bad" merely so-so. And if you really hate the DRM THAT MUCH... JUST BUY IT ON A CONSOLE.
It's the exact same DRM they proposed for the original Mass Effect on the PC. That ignited a firestorm on the Bioware forums that took months to blow over and created some ill will toward the developer that still lingers today. It's caused me, a dedicated Dragon Age fan who was a sure buyer for the sequel, to cancel my pre-order. Whether I have an internet connection or not isn't relevant, it's the lack of control over the game I just purchased. I bought it, I ought to be able to play it when I want to, as I want to, and without having to involve any other parties. Not for a single player game. It's just asinine.bahumat42 said:if you have a PC that you use for videogames its a safe assumption that you have an internet connection. I cant think of anybody who would have an issue with this (other than laptop users, but you can still be connected to the internet on the move now aswell so. Its a non-issuethe.writer said:With the announcement of this DRM setup one can acknowledge that it is just assumed at this point in time that everyone who will buy this game has access to the internet. What do you think of that?
You think it will deter pirates, I think it will create pirates.jovack22 said:I think this is justified.
5-10 years ago, this would have been incredibly frustrating, but by this day and age, the vast majority of people with a gaming computer will have an internet connection too.
I have no solid evidence to back that claim up, but I'd say it's a sound hypothesis.
My Dragon Age Ultimate edition requires internet connection to have access to the content too, and this does not really bother me at all. If my internet was for any reason broken, I could go do something else for the time being.
True it's not perfect, and I understand that if I payed for the game, it should be mine to play wherever/whenever (and we can be together...) I want, but due to piracy being so rampant, this is just not a reality anymore.
A lot of people are also claiming that this will not deter pirates at all... that's not true.
Some people will still get a hold of the game illegally, but it will deter at least a significant fraction of people willing to download illegally. Until there is a better system, that's just the way it has to be.