Yay! No comic continual story crap. This one has an end! Good thing too. I meant, what do you send at Commander Shepard after a bunch of galaxy destroying supper machines.
Ah yes, Reapers. We have dismi- *headshoots.* I want this option. It would be hilarious. I'm not too picky when it comes to ME, so I say Bring it on, Bioware. I trust them with the universe.TheDoctor455 said:The one thing that would be EXTREMELY satisfying for me is if they gave you the option to deliver a long, drawn-out "the reason you suck speech" to the Citadel Council. Doesn't really matter WHEN but I would guess either right after the Council members show up on the Normandy (as some screens indicate) or towards the end of the game after you've successfully beaten back the Reaper Invasion (or more hauntingly, after you've failed, and can quite legitimately blame the Council for the failure since a LOT of problems would've been solved if they had listened).
They want dice rolls. You know, where the attack is determined based on stats multiplied by a random number? Apparently, some people believe that true RPG's require you to be "detached" from your character so you can pretend you're actually playing the "role" rather than playing a "game." Or something like that. It doesn't make much sense to me, but then again, these complaints don't make much sense to you either. People on the internet are 1) weird and 2) love to complain.Racecarlock said:How many times am I going to hear "It's going to turn into COD!". Firstly, they said they are adding some of the RPG elements back in, and secondly, I am just sick of reading it. When I first read it I was like "meh" because I am not a big mass effect fan. But seriously, in every goddamn ME3 thread now, there's always 2 or more people that go "GAAAH It's going to turn into Gears of Call of halo!". Is there one point in mass effect history that didn't have cover based shooting? I mean, what else do you want? Turn based? RTS? What? I actually had to do alot of shooting in ME1 when I played through it, so I don't know why people are suddenly complaining about it when it's been there since 1. Also, again, I see that damn complaint on every ME3 thread. Can't we go through ONE without seeing it? Please?
As i said, i know the lore but with ME3 having a strong rumor of space battles it'd be a great format for the game.Chicago Ted said:http://masseffect.wikia.com/wiki/First_Contact_WarFujor said:Mcoffey said:Fujor said:three words for you Bioware.
Read through this. The conflict amounts to very little, with only one battle for planetary control, the rest being a series of small ship to ship skirmishes. Before either side even had fully prepared themselves for a real conflict, the Council intervened.
To put it in a different perspective, it'd be like making a game centred around a minor territorial dispute before the UN intervened and the situation was peacefully resolved. There just isn't much material there to work with.
It'd be better to set something in a new setting as well instead of look into minor backstory events. We've still only gotten to see a fraction of the galaxy, even the Citadel, Omega, or Illium.
I see what you mean then. Didn't the Mass Effect movie get a green light? I know there's a trilogy of books out as well and the graphic novel that came out before...either ME2 or, before one of the DLC's seemed like it would be open ended. Maybe we'll get a First Contact War FPS. Seemed like a pretty big deal (unless that's what the movie(s) will be about)Mimsofthedawg said:They mentioned something about an MMO, but in the same statement, they also basically said that's thinking too small.Shoggoth2588 said:-snip-
And I think it is. I wouldn't be surprised if this launched into a multi-media entertainment empire - the "Star Wars/Star Trek" of our generation.
You'll see books where the author's are given a lot more lee way in the happenings of the universe (kind of like Star Wars), you'll see new games set in the same Universe, you'll probably see them developed by more than one developer eventually, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if they were going to make a movie out of this... either based on the original trilogy or something new.
Except there's the fact that Shepherd losing would mean the end of every living being in the galaxy. Kind of hard to make a game with a dead character.Alphakirby said:This pretty much sums up why I feel the "Shepard loses" ending would be the best one. Because for two whole games we've been seeing this man as what is pretty much space Jesus in the eyes of all the in game characters (Much like how Gordon Freeman is beard Jesus in the Half-Life series),to see him fall and have the universe suffer would create some form of closure,and end with something better than "Shepard punched alien Hitler in the face".
Sometimes,a sad ending is the best ending.
i second thisProgrammed_For_Damage said:I can see my Shepard settling down, Mormon-style, with Miranda, Liara and Ashley on some remote colony; dispensing frontier justice when the need arises.
At home with the Shepherd's! See (the now retired) Commander Shepherd relax, do the house work, cook up a mean fondue, change his blue babies nappies!Logan Westbrook said:it's no surprise that Shepard's story ends with Mass Effect 3. That's not really a bad thing though; once you've saved the galaxy from malevolent giant robots from space, it's hard to think of a way to top that.