BioWare Will Continue to Make PS3 Games

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
Pingieking said:
Kandon Arc said:
Neither surprising nor exciting. There's yet to be a Bioware game that wasn't best on PC.
This.
Treblaine said:
Well dragons age origins was graphically worse on PS3 so if that is a precedent I don't have high hopes for the future.
Personally, I found the PS3 version to be better looking than the X360 version. I actually thought that the X360 version looked like a port, while the PS3 version looked more like a parallel project. Though the difference is not that big, and PC version is still by far the best.

Also, I find that the quality for cross-platform games usually end up being more like:
360>PS3>PC
You got your arrows the wrong way around. They are represented like this:

2 > 1 (2 "is greater than" 1)

I think you mean PC > PS3 > 360

However I'd point you to Digital Foundry that is now hosted at Eurogamer:

http://www.eurogamer.net/digitalfoundry/

These guys are real pros, they know all the tech of the industry and they know how to Quantifiably measure and Objectively compare all the aspects of a games graphics and performance on all the major platforms. They put all the other "side by side" comparison videos on sides like Gametrailers to shame... To Shame!

They seem to find more often than not multiplatform games are better on 360 than PS3, though there are a few examples where PS3 comes out on top, all too often it is like Bayonetta where the PS3 version barely deserves a release.

Conversely they also find that PS3 exclusive games are the best looking console games of this generation, outshining even the best 360 has to offer. So the site simultaneously is accused of Sony fanboyism and Xbox fanboyism which is weird.
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,169
0
0
Lord Krunk said:
Daedalus1942 said:
Psychosocial said:
CountFenring said:
So ME3 on PS3? I think it's a little too late for ME2.
Yeah, releasing the third part of an insanely story driven series sounds like one hell of an idea. I'm sure Bioware have other games than Mass Effect being worked on.
Jade Empire II? ohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease.
Nah, wouldn't work. Maybe if it was set in a completely different time (like, for example, playing as Sagacious Tien) but otherwise, I can't see them doing it without ruining the series.
Exactly! Different characters, different story, same addictive gameplay. I'd prefer that over Dragon Age: Origins (as decent as it is).
 

Jumplion

New member
Mar 10, 2008
7,873
0
0
Well, good for Bioware then. I haven't played Dragon Age: Origins yet, though if I had a decent enough computer to play it on I would (though I do have it on my GameFly queue for PS3).
 

Lord Krunk

New member
Mar 3, 2008
4,809
0
0
Daedalus1942 said:
Lord Krunk said:
Daedalus1942 said:
Psychosocial said:
CountFenring said:
So ME3 on PS3? I think it's a little too late for ME2.
Yeah, releasing the third part of an insanely story driven series sounds like one hell of an idea. I'm sure Bioware have other games than Mass Effect being worked on.
Jade Empire II? ohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease.
Nah, wouldn't work. Maybe if it was set in a completely different time (like, for example, playing as Sagacious Tien) but otherwise, I can't see them doing it without ruining the series.
Exactly! Different characters, different story, same addictive gameplay. I'd prefer that over Dragon Age: Origins (as decent as it is).
Same here.
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
Treblaine said:
Are you a shill? You certainly give the impression of one.

Oddly, it was said comparison that made me think the PS3 looked slightly better than the 360 version. I dunno if it's how they edit or how they capture, but the 360 always seems to have this washed out appearance. Of course we're really just picking at sticks by bickering over graphical quality.

Might be able to garner a better conclusion if I could actually find someone who talks about the PS3 version, which I find odd.
 

CrafterMan

New member
Aug 3, 2008
920
0
0
So... Mass Effect huh *winks and nudges*

-PLEASE BIOWARE PLEASE I'LL BE YOUR *****-

/over the topness

-Joe
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
DeadlyYellow said:
Treblaine said:
Are you a shill? You certainly give the impression of one.

Oddly, it was said comparison that made me think the PS3 looked slightly better than the 360 version. I dunno if it's how they edit or how they capture, but the 360 always seems to have this washed out appearance. Of course we're really just picking at sticks by bickering over graphical quality.

Might be able to garner a better conclusion if I could actually find someone who talks about the PS3 version, which I find odd.
If I am advocating any platform it is PC and that's not because I own stock in nvidia but simply because I believe it is the best platform. I'm sorry if you have a problem with me if I try to spread some helpful advice or insight, but I've put a lot of time into researching this stuff so want to spread it around a bit.

Yeah, I suppose I am a bit of a graphics whore but you don't spend huge amounts of money on components, consoles, speakers and monitors just to end up stumbling at the last hurdle with an inferior version of a game. Everyone says "graphics don't matter" and then Killzone 2 gets Perfect 10 scores all around the place, I think graphics DO matter, they are not the Only thing nor even the First thing to consider but with a foundation of solid gameplay (the most important element), amazing graphics can make a good game a Great game.

Digital Foundry is a bloody great site and I really wish more people would go there for comparisons, rather that settle for amateurish video comparisons at the likes of gametrailers which do nothing but start pointless forum flame wars.

On your Dragon Age Origins conclusion, I'm sorry but "washed out" is not a quantifiable measurement and is usually almost entirely down to the brightness and colour settings which for some strange reason are different between so many 360 and PS3 versions of multiplatform games, for whatever reason.

Take a look at Digital Foundry's article on Modern Warfare 2, they had to extensively adjust both the PS3 and 360 version's colour/brightness settings to harmonise them for a true comparison. It is true for so many other games and I suspect for Dragon Age Origins as well.

There are many measurable and quantifiable ways that games can be compared, like:
-Native Resolution
-Anti aliasing
-frame rate
-screen tearing
-presence of motion blur and other distinct effects.

Texture comparisons deserve full 720p or 1080p representation with screen-shots or at least playing back the gameplay at half or quarter speed, and recorded with good equipment. DF has a very fair solution of cropping the 720p video output from the consoles so every pixel from the console is represented undistorted on the flash-player in your browser. I don't know any other site that does such thorough and authentic analysis as that.

They don't just do comparisons, they do features on exclusive titles, detailing if the graphics and performance really do live up to the developers' hype. For example, they were the first to notice the NXE install of Halo 3 actually made the game load slower and they were able to find out why that was. They detail precisely how games like Wipeout HD actually employ 1080p.

I mean the likes of gametrailers's supposedly "impartial" side by side comparisons are worse than useless as they inject conjecture and argument where there is no need. Flash video can only play back at 30 fps yet so many games are sold on having frame-rates faster than 30 fps like virtually all fighting games and certain FPS games like from the COD franchise. Then there is the resolution, downscaling from 720p to 576p or whatever resolution GT use loses so much detail (especially if you follow the scaling path on the console) so you can't even tell which game has anti-aliasing or not.

Beware of poorly slapped together comparison videos, all too often they are worse than no video at all and in my opinion technical analysis should be left to the experts. And Digital Foundry are THE experts along with beyond3D forums.

The Escapist has been wise to stay out of this area, they do reviews of games and movies but steer well away from the technical and focus on the "soul" of games. That is why I love this site, they give me the insight into which games are worth getting, then Digital Foundry shows which is the best way to play said games.
 

Eagle Est1986

That One Guy
Nov 21, 2007
1,976
0
0
What's that Bioware? You're going to refine and re-release the Mass Effect trilogy on the PS3 in 2012? All on one disc? Excellent news! I'll put my pre-order down now.
 

Firia

New member
Sep 17, 2007
1,945
0
0
Chipperz said:
CountFenring said:
Mass Effect 1 and 2

I don't care either way, Dragon Age was faaaaaaar better.
I've only played the starter area of ME1, but I gotta say; having a talking protagonist was pretty nice. I don't like having a Mute in Dragon Age. That said, I'm a Dragon Age addict! ;)
 

Daedalus1942

New member
Jun 26, 2009
4,169
0
0
Lord Krunk said:
Daedalus1942 said:
Lord Krunk said:
Daedalus1942 said:
Psychosocial said:
CountFenring said:
So ME3 on PS3? I think it's a little too late for ME2.
Yeah, releasing the third part of an insanely story driven series sounds like one hell of an idea. I'm sure Bioware have other games than Mass Effect being worked on.
Jade Empire II? ohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohpleaseohplease.
Nah, wouldn't work. Maybe if it was set in a completely different time (like, for example, playing as Sagacious Tien) but otherwise, I can't see them doing it without ruining the series.
Exactly! Different characters, different story, same addictive gameplay. I'd prefer that over Dragon Age: Origins (as decent as it is).
Same here.
Dragon Age: Origins isn't an mmo...
 

DeadlyYellow

New member
Jun 18, 2008
5,141
0
0
Treblaine said:
Pardon my brashness. Your researched mannerisms are similar to those of one belonging to a corporation, yet lacking the sheer blind relentlessness I associate with so-called 'fanboys.'

For the most part, as I'm sure you have garnered, I am an outsider in relations to the true technical nature of the media. It's more a pursuit of curiosity, one in this case has only very partially been rectified. As pointed out, the only straight comparison of the three versions I could find was one GameTrailers, but it largely seems like their Xbox 360 captures have a slight grayish tinge which makes that particular one seem a bit faded. At the moment, I am having some trouble finding a comparison on Digital Foundry.

It is a trivial matter anyway, as I don't own the game and only have a passing interest. While visual touches are nice, I'm not going to enjoy a game any less if their is the occasional slight dip in frames. I still try to hold true to the pursuit of personal entertainment first and foremost rather than scrutinize the game's technological failures.
 

Jandau

Smug Platypus
Dec 19, 2008
5,034
0
0
I, as a PC gamer, hope that our PS3 brothers get Mass Effect 2, if not at initial release, then as a good quality port soon after. Hell, I hope they also get ME1 bundled with it...
 

Nova5

Interceptor
Sep 5, 2009
589
0
0
dark-amon said:
Well it's not like it's a bad thing for anyone. Ps3-owners get more good games. BioWare get more consumers, Xbox-owners and PS3-owners get more games to discuss where both parts experience the games. The only people who loose on this are Xbox-fanboys, but I don't care about the fanboys-war so they don't count.
Pretty much, man. I thought Mass Effect was pretty cool, so it'll be sweet to see what other titles they'll be bringing to the platform. Sadly, have yet to pick up DA: Origins.
 

Altorin

Jack of No Trades
May 16, 2008
6,976
0
0
as much as I'm all for non-exclusives, Bioware was one of those companies that basically sold me 2 generations of xboxes... they might not sell me my next system, because I may choose to go sony's route - I bought my 360 because I knew I'd get quality bioware games on it.

I feel sort of bad for Microsoft, haha (not too bad though)

Tekyro said:
Personally, my fingers are crossed for KOTOR3
you're not going to like this, but The Old Republic is basically KOTOR3, and it's in good hands with Bioware.

Warcraft 3 fans were pissed about the loss of Warcraft 4 for World of Warcraft, but that's how the cookie crumbles.

I would think that if you enjoyed KOTOR though, getting the Old Republic wouldn't be a bad option.. they're putting a lot of work into making it feel un-mmoish... including a fully voice acted and HUGE story driven setting.

I just hope if they attempt to fashion it after WoW, they choose to establish it on WoW now, rather then WoW 5 years ago, because having to relearn from WoW's own mistakes would really put them in dead last in the MMO race.

you don't care though, you were just being glib.
 

Leftnt Sharpe

Nick Furry
Apr 2, 2009
560
0
0
I've never owned a a Playstation in my life but I think its great that people who only have a PS3 can play the brilliant games that have brought joy to so many. It also means that Bioware can bring in more money, appeasing EA and thus allowing them more free rein over their own dev teams.
 

Pingieking

New member
Sep 19, 2009
1,362
0
0
Treblaine said:
Pingieking said:
Kandon Arc said:
Neither surprising nor exciting. There's yet to be a Bioware game that wasn't best on PC.
This.
Treblaine said:
Well dragons age origins was graphically worse on PS3 so if that is a precedent I don't have high hopes for the future.
Personally, I found the PS3 version to be better looking than the X360 version. I actually thought that the X360 version looked like a port, while the PS3 version looked more like a parallel project. Though the difference is not that big, and PC version is still by far the best.

Also, I find that the quality for cross-platform games usually end up being more like:
360>PS3>PC
You got your arrows the wrong way around. They are represented like this:

2 > 1 (2 "is greater than" 1)

I think you mean PC > PS3 > 360

However I'd point you to Digital Foundry that is now hosted at Eurogamer:

http://www.eurogamer.net/digitalfoundry/

These guys are real pros, they know all the tech of the industry and they know how to Quantifiably measure and Objectively compare all the aspects of a games graphics and performance on all the major platforms. They put all the other "side by side" comparison videos on sides like Gametrailers to shame... To Shame!

They seem to find more often than not multiplatform games are better on 360 than PS3, though there are a few examples where PS3 comes out on top, all too often it is like Bayonetta where the PS3 version barely deserves a release.

Conversely they also find that PS3 exclusive games are the best looking console games of this generation, outshining even the best 360 has to offer. So the site simultaneously is accused of Sony fanboyism and Xbox fanboyism which is weird.
I actually don't mean that. Being a physics major, I know exactly what I wrote down; I do mean X360 versions are GENERALLY better than PS3 versions, which are GENERALLY better than PC versions (the website you directed me to supports my claim, and thanks for the website). This is not due to the platforms themselves (because the platform quality goes in the exact opposite position, PC>PS3>X360); it is caused by developers programming for X360 and not managing their ports well. Perhaps you misread my post?

Since I didn't have empirical data to back up my claims, I worked from personal experience (this makes my claims a bit shaky, but thankfully the guys at Digital Foundry seems to suport my findings). Prototype on the PC was atrocious, Bayonetta PS3 version should not exist (at least as it is), and there are numerous other examples of X360 games outperforming the same game on other platforms. Dragon Age was a nice addition to the games that seemed to have worked each platform to its fullest, producing a quality comparison of PC>PS3>X360.

BTW. Yes, PC is the best platform. Most powerful, most versatile, and (in the right hands, such as mine) the cheapest.