Sparrow said:
And deserved, I would say. If anything Black Ops has fixed several issues MW2 made with the multiplayer, for which they should be commended for.
Electrogecko said:
Great.....just great.
When they release another one next year, will people flock to it once more?
When is everybody gonna wake the fuck up?
Yes, when will everyone wake up and accept that what you think is right? What a bunch of bad, bad people.
So you think this is not a bad thing? That this game, more than any other game in history, deserves this title? That developers won't see this and start grinding out their own uninspired FPS's annually like it's their sole duty? Why is it that shooters sell so much better than any other game, even if they're mediocre? (wait I know the answer to that question) When is this trend going to end?
I'm sure Black Ops is brilliant, and the fact that it's multi-platform certainly helps with it's sales numbers, but is it really that much different or better than MW2? And even if it was, do the pair of them really deserve the 1 and 2 spots for the biggest game launches in history? I know the campaign (once again) is short as hell, and as far as I can tell, the only differences in multiplayer come from the menu screens and the shiny knick-knacks you're rewarded for playing. Anything they did to balance the combat could've (and should've) been done in an update.
I think the entire thing makes the gaming community appear really shallow and insecure. I can name about 20 games that deserve to be experienced more than any CoD. It's just some of them may have color or a distinct lack of blood, gore, and guns.