The school followed through with one, they dropped the charges in the other.
The only difference in the two cases is whether or not the school suspended the student. When it came to the police interaction, both schools reacted the same in that they both called the police.
You're also being mislead when it comes to the word "charges" again.
"dropped charges" and "pressing charges" have no legal meaning. When the police ask people "do you want to press charges" what it really means is "will you be cooperative in taking a statement, and will you show up in court if we request you as a witness?"
The word "charge" is meaningless. The words you should be scared of is "arrest warrant" or "criminal conviction" or "criminal record". Those words actually have real meanings and real consequences.
In both cases the officer showed up, looked around, confirmed that it wasn't a real weapon, said "be careful", and left.
Both of these events should have generated a "record".
You're just letting words like words like "charges" and "records" scare you.
Didn't you see, where they stated they stated that they could not let her view the evidence because they didn't make a record?
In which article? The one about the white boy?
BALTIMORE (WBFF) - A Baltimore County family is warning other parents after they say police were called to their house over something that happened during a virtual school lesson. The incident is raising concerns over privacy and safety in the era of online learning. As a Navy veteran with four...
foxbaltimore.com
It says " She was also told she could not see the screenshot of her son’s bedroom, because it’s not part of his student record. "
She was told, by the SCHOOL, not the police, that she could not view the screenshot of her son's bedroom because it's not part of the son's STUDENT record.
Let's not confuse police records, the records that you claimed could be pulled up during a traffic stop, and school records, which obviously can't.
The 11 yr old white kid had the police show up and determined no crime was committed
That's exactly what they did here with the black kid.
The police showed up and determined that no crime was committed.
Neither the black kid or the white kid got arrested.
The only difference is what sorts of "records" each school made, and how they disciplined the students.
and the police will have a record of the call to the house, but it will say there was no evidence of a crime committed, unlike the black kid.
Here's the record that your article links to
Please point out where it says that there was evidence that a crime was committed.
You won't be able to, not because it's partially redacted, but because the document doesn't say such a thing. In fact it explicitly says "Closed - Non Criminal" up at the top.
See?
Don't be scared of words like "charges" or "records". They don't necessarily mean what you think they mean.