How am I dancing round the point? You asked if I'd be offended and I quite clearly said no. I even gave a reason. Just because you don't like the reason doesn't make my point invalidAbandon4093 said:He still wouldn't be Caucasian. Think cheekbones, brows etc. And you're kinda dancing around the point on a technicality there aren't you?Pallindromemordnillap said:I'd say yes, it would be okay to make a film based on an African tribal myth and make one guy white. I'm pretty sure there was an orisha who had skin bleached white as boneAbandon4093 said:They also knew those races had their own Gods.Pallindromemordnillap said:I don't see a problem with a black Nordic god. The Norse as a people were exceptional sailors and we've found artefacts such as dirhems (silver coins from the islamic world) and even a golden statue of freaking Buddha in Viking graves. That particular statue has a twin, currently in a museum in India. So the Norse knew full well there were races other than Caucasians
The parallel I made early still stands here really.
If a film or any kind of representation of (for the sake of argument) Hindu Gods or even traditional African deities was to be made. Would it be okay to cast a white guy as one of them?
I mean this film isn't exactly an accurate representation of Norse mythology any way, so it isn't that much of an issue. But can you imagine for a second if the tables were turned on that?
I'd be annoyed if they made a film about tribal deities and made on a white dude.