Black Thor Actor Talks About Racist Comic Book Fans

Gindil

New member
Nov 28, 2009
1,621
0
0
Cherry Cola said:
So my point still stands: Nobody from Scandinavia has no reason to proclaim their national heritage.
But... But...


Without a national heritage, this guy wouldn't be as awesome!

(For all the people thinking I'm serious, IT'S A JOKE!)
 

fulano

New member
Oct 14, 2007
1,685
0
0
The only problem I had with that character was that he wasn't used enough. If you can scream while frozen you deserve more screen time. It's just how it is.
 

roninlevel

New member
Jun 10, 2010
8
0
0
as a dane, with no real knowledge over the Thor comics, i will be honest and say this annoys me... dont care about how he's pictured in the comic, dont care about left wing bullshit or token black actor..

what i care about is that there's a movie i was looking forward to, and since im fairly critical over detail work in movies, it will be an annoyance that will nag me all the way through the film, because even though he may play it great or that it may be that way in the comic, in my subconsciusnes i will know that it just isnt right that way.

Heijmdahl is the god born of nine virgin mothers and shall be the one of the last to fall at Ragnarok.

Its hard to ignore what ive learned through my childhood, when they use the names, the hierachy and the same powers.

in the end, i wont se the movie because like any other movie that has a detail that i cant ignore, it will end up ruining it for me
 

CheckD3

New member
Dec 9, 2009
1,181
0
0
He really did a great job at the role and it's retarded that people are talking about his color as an insult to the cannon. It was made by Marvel, it was a good movie, and he played the role amazing.

In comparison to The Last Airbender, that movie's problem in casting wasn't the colors of the actors, but by some of the acting, and the script, which was horse manure on steroids of suckness.

Elba did a great job in the movie, was played beautifully. Though Thor felt more like a jumping off point to the Avengers, it crafted the characters strongly, especially the gods, each personality was strong, and I'm excited to see more of the villain, who had the worst writing because they didn't have enough characterization about him, but was much more, interesting, than Thor and his life lesson of 'grow up'
 

Erja_Perttu

New member
May 6, 2009
1,847
0
0
I've never read Thor, but I do love reading about Mythology, so yeah, it was a bit of a turn, but it worked really well.

There was a brilliant gravitas and basassness to the role, and it worked. Who cares what damn colour the guy was?
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
I've got no problem with a black guy being cast in Thor.
The Norse Gods were white though...

That said, I'm pretty sure the norse gods also didn't wear rainbow capes. And have winged helmets. And- Oh hell, I'll let SatW say it for me...
http://satwcomic.com/nordic-halloween
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
Cherry Cola said:
Realitycrash said:
Cherry Cola said:
PS: What is up with all the people feeling the need to point out that they are from Scandinavia? To anyone who does this: You have no, nor will you ever have, any connection to Norse Mythology in your entire existence. Your nationality doesn't suddenly make you higher above everyone else in this discussion.
Actually, we do. Norse-gods and religion still flavor our culture, our national holidays, and our common names.
As late as the 19th century, Rune-writing was still used in some parts of the country (Sweden), and paganism is alive and well.

So don't speak of things you don't know anything about.
These are not connections. These are conventions. People in England can be said to have as much of a connection to Nordic religion as Scandinavians. All of this is superficial. The names, the holidays, it's just a superficial link between contemporary Scandinavia and Nordic Mythology that might as well be doing-fuck-all-because-we-can days.

As for the culture, that's just false. Ignoring the fact that the culture of Scandinavia is pathetically insignificant as it is, there is nothing from Norse Mythology that support the social rules now in place. The popular Swedish mindset of everything having to be "lagom" came from Viking custom. Hell, Sweden could barely call itself a real country until far after Nordic Mythology was abolished.

As for the runes, you are once again applying Nordic Mythology to something it had absolutely nothing to do with.

Let me just put this as clearly as possible: Norse Mythology did not have any moral values to enforce. It had no messages to preach, it had nothing to teach. It is one of the most pointless religions ever to have existed.

So my point still stands: Nobody from Scandinavia has no reason to proclaim their national heritage.
LOL at bolded. If it had no value it wouldn't have existed in the first place. Norse mythology reflected the war-like attitude of the vikings, and like it or not, the vikings were one of the most influential forces in medieval history, not only as conquers but as world class merchants. In fact, despite depictions of them being mindless barbarians they were incredibly skilled craftsmen and actually worked to spread the advances of civilization, especially to Ireland. Britain would be unrecognizable without the vikings (I'm not sure if you're aware of this but the Normans were of viking decent as well).

Are you perchance a Christian, and if so, would I be out of line to assume that you think that Christianity is the only religion that has a worthwhile value system? I hate to break it to you, but it was exactly when Scandinavians became Christians that they stopped having much of an effect on European history.
 

Verlander

New member
Apr 22, 2010
2,449
0
0
Oh noes, the left!!! Those left wingers just want to destroy the world! What'll be next, we aren't allowed to rape people? Political correctness gone mad !!!!!1111111


Ahem, just racists looking to hate. Allow them to stew in their hate, eating up in them until they die from it, hopefully from shock of seeing their daughter marrying a black man. Nothing to see here folks...
 

parintachin

New member
Nov 28, 2009
7
0
0
Eh? Spitting, puking and peeing on the witty old tales is fine, but casting a black guy? NOW WE'RE OUTRAGED!!

.. The marvel Thor, this movie and everything else about the frnchise are completely and utterly disgusting, but certainly not because of a black Heimdal.
 

Char-Nobyl

New member
May 8, 2009
784
0
0
Meh. He's supposed to play a member of a pantheon of gods. Even if said pantheon is worshiped by pretty much nothing but white people, it doesn't seem like a stretch if one of the burly manly-men happens to have a different skin color.

I lol'd at the hilarious objections, though. This is an actor playing a fictional/mythological character in fictional/mythological situations. This isn't like trying to insert a black, an Asian, and a Latino into a scene depicting the signing of the Declaration of Independence.

The only sorta-valid objection I can see is from comic fans who say that the character has always been white...but even then, Nick Fury was played by Samuel L. Jackson, and somehow I don't think that a ridiculously minor character in Thor comics has nearly as much of a following as Nick motherfucking Fury.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
You know what I want to see? A black Sherlock Holmes.
Same time period, same clothes, same mannerisms. Just make him black.

Sure there would be no point to it, and the character will seem out of place and confusing with the backdrop, and to keep with the setting pretty muche everyone else will have to be white anyway but...

Okay look at this either one of two ways;
1) either a comparison to the casting in thor, or
2) that we really need to start using these forever re-used characters with different ethnic origins for a modern age. We keep recycling them anyway, why not shake it up?
 

Fetzenfisch

New member
Sep 11, 2009
2,460
0
0
Well since its a movie about marvel and not a movie about norse mythology its ok.
If you really are defending the myths seriously, you wont do it on the basis of those wacky dudes in tigths. Still it would be interesting to make a movie with an asian or arabic as jesus in it. Since he is always depicted WAY paler than he should be. Was kinda sunny where he lived.
 

ZombieGenesis

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,909
0
0
Fetzenfisch said:
Well since its a movie about marvel and not a movie about norse mythology its ok.
If you really are defending the myths seriously, you wont do it on the basis of those wacky dudes in tigths. Still it would be interesting to make a movie with an asian or arabic as jesus in it. Since he is always depicted WAY paler than he should be. Was kinda sunny where he lived.
Actually, that's a damn good comparison.

Nobody seems to have (many) qualms about Jesus being depicted as a while man. Despite being born in Jerusalem, in a time before the divide of Rome. I don't know what the technical word would be for Jewish born people of that area but... 'brown' sums it up I guess?

Had a christian girlfriend once who freaked when I told her Jesus was not as white as the driven snow.
 

MERCENAUT

New member
Mar 1, 2011
2
0
0
I'm pissed at the casting only because Idris Elba is an excellent actor and should be headlining in his own movie
 

Technicka

New member
Jul 7, 2010
93
0
0
ReiverCorrupter said:
Given the context of them being aliens there isn't much of a problem with one of them being black. However, let's be realistic, it probably does have some overtones of social commentary. Why would it be alright for people to complain about white actors playing traditionally non-white historical/mythological figures while it's okay for the reverse to happen? Two wrongs don't make a right. A better answer would be to develop movies based upon mythological figures from other cultures than to try to make one culture's mythology multicultural. That's just absurd.

But like I said, within the comic/film's context it makes sense.

Logan Westbrook said:
Although Elba doesn't look like a typical viking, it's not as if he's playing a historical figure, and it's hardly the only liberty that Marvel has taken with the Norse pantheon. As insults go, saying that the Norse gods were actually aliens with some really advanced technology - which is actually true in the Marvel canon - would seem to be much worse than casting a black actor as Heimdall, but strangely, no one seems to be bothered about that fact.
I like Norse mythology, and I have to say, I am far more upset with other things than the black Heimdall. The point at which I laugh hysterically whilst viewing the previews is when Odin (Anthony Hopkins) makes Thor swear to uphold the peace...

WHAT. THE. FUCK!?!?!?!

It's one thing to take some liberties with characters and minor facts, but this simply isn't Norse mythology even in its most basic spirit. Norse mythology revolves around war. The universe begins in war and it ends in war. Not only that, but war is essentially the meaning of existence. It is not just a sad fact of reality, but something glorious. One only gains entrance to Valhalla by dying in battle. Cowards go to hell. Death in battle was the goal, and most Norsemen feared what they called a 'straw death' (i.e. the peaceful death that everyone seems to value in modern society). Old men would often go out into the roads with their swords and chain themselves to some of their treasure so that passers by would attack and hopefully kill them.

To suggest that the goal of the Aesir is to uphold peace flies in the face of everything that is central to Norse mythology. It's one thing to criticize their value system, but to misappropriate it in this way is just blatantly disrespectful and a sign of callous arrogance and assumed cultural superiority, if not simply a sign of downright willful ignorance.
All your ranting and rage is missing one key point: Marvel's Thor has never been a faithful re-telling of Norse myths. It's about as true to the source as Captain Marvel (Shazam) is to the myths in which he derives his powers. You're demanding authenticity from something that has never made an effort to hold true to the stories.
 

tigermilk

New member
Sep 4, 2010
951
0
0
thenumberthirteen said:
I just saw the film yesterday, and I'm glad he was cast in the role. He was epic! I would have gladly watched an entire film about him without a single mention of Thor.
You may want to check out 'The Wire', if you haven't allready. He was awsome in that.

OT: The only reason I didn't want him to be in Thor is because he is with a good script (Luther was fucking awfully scripted) an awesome actor and I would rather see him in something I wan't to watch.
 

ReiverCorrupter

New member
Jun 4, 2010
629
0
0
Technicka said:
ReiverCorrupter said:
Given the context of them being aliens there isn't much of a problem with one of them being black. However, let's be realistic, it probably does have some overtones of social commentary. Why would it be alright for people to complain about white actors playing traditionally non-white historical/mythological figures while it's okay for the reverse to happen? Two wrongs don't make a right. A better answer would be to develop movies based upon mythological figures from other cultures than to try to make one culture's mythology multicultural. That's just absurd.

But like I said, within the comic/film's context it makes sense.

Logan Westbrook said:
Although Elba doesn't look like a typical viking, it's not as if he's playing a historical figure, and it's hardly the only liberty that Marvel has taken with the Norse pantheon. As insults go, saying that the Norse gods were actually aliens with some really advanced technology - which is actually true in the Marvel canon - would seem to be much worse than casting a black actor as Heimdall, but strangely, no one seems to be bothered about that fact.
I like Norse mythology, and I have to say, I am far more upset with other things than the black Heimdall. The point at which I laugh hysterically whilst viewing the previews is when Odin (Anthony Hopkins) makes Thor swear to uphold the peace...

WHAT. THE. FUCK!?!?!?!

It's one thing to take some liberties with characters and minor facts, but this simply isn't Norse mythology even in its most basic spirit. Norse mythology revolves around war. The universe begins in war and it ends in war. Not only that, but war is essentially the meaning of existence. It is not just a sad fact of reality, but something glorious. One only gains entrance to Valhalla by dying in battle. Cowards go to hell. Death in battle was the goal, and most Norsemen feared what they called a 'straw death' (i.e. the peaceful death that everyone seems to value in modern society). Old men would often go out into the roads with their swords and chain themselves to some of their treasure so that passers by would attack and hopefully kill them.

To suggest that the goal of the Aesir is to uphold peace flies in the face of everything that is central to Norse mythology. It's one thing to criticize their value system, but to misappropriate it in this way is just blatantly disrespectful and a sign of callous arrogance and assumed cultural superiority, if not simply a sign of downright willful ignorance.
All your ranting and rage is missing one key point: Marvel's Thor has never been a faithful re-telling of Norse myths. It's about as true to the source as Captain Marvel (Shazam) is to the myths in which he derives his powers. You're demanding authenticity from something that has never made an effort to hold true to the stories.
All of your snarky comeback has been undermined by not reading the full post. Like I said, I'm fine with small changes, but what they're doing is comparable to having a (non-satirical) movie about how Jesus loves war and hates the meek and poor. I think even depicting God as a woman (see: Dogma) can be done (perhaps not without controversy) and you could still be making a movie about Christianity. But if you change the basic tenets of the religion with no real explanation one can question whether you're not just misrepresenting it. But, like I said, it's based on a comic book, so all I can't complain too much, I just hope that too many people come away from it thinking that the vikings really believed in peace and love just because some fantastic movie based upon a comic book depicted them that way. Sure it seems stupid that anyone would do that. But hey, people tend to be stupid, and I have every right to be annoyed by their stupidity.
 

ugeine

New member
Aug 6, 2009
85
0
0
For hundreds of years, Jesus, a man who was born in Palestine, has been portrayed as a white skinned man. Nobody cared.

I don't see how this is any different, apart from the fact that Jesus' portrayal as this is treated as historically accurate by some, while nobody is going to walk away from this movie thinking Thor was black.

The only people who have a legitimate problem with the casting of Idris are comic book purists. Everybody else is just been racist, or disguising their racism with creative language, protesting that they're railing against 'liberal agendas' 'political correctness' and 'left wing social engineering'.