Blizzard Busts 320,000 in Battle.net Ban

Rainboq

Elite Member
Nov 19, 2009
16,620
0
41
The only appropriate thing to say here is:

[HEADING=2]STOP! HAMMER TIME![/HEADING]
 

RvLeshrac

This is a Forum Title.
Oct 2, 2008
662
0
0
CuddlyCombine said:
The bad part about this is that they're sweeping everything, not just the bad stuff. I've had to stop using a third-party program whose sole purpose is to reconnect the user after they've lost connection; in other words, it's an unofficial patch for Blizzard's 10-year-old multiplayer code. It can't do anything else. Yet, they'll ban you for using it.

I understand where they're coming from, but maybe they should update those ToS or something. This makes them look plain stupid.
They're sweeping TOS violations. Using an external third-party application which directly interacts with the game is a TOS violation.

If they don't go after ALL of them, then they have no legal standing to go after ANY of them.
 

RikSharp

New member
Feb 11, 2009
403
0
0
psrdirector said:
bjj hero said:
psrdirector said:
:p i was more mentioning that informing on people for some sort of authority can also be done for good, and not just evil :p
You don't have to tell me. I'd dob my next door neighbor in as a Montenegrin War Criminal for a Pot noodle and a packet of Monster munch.
I have no clue what on earth monster munch is....
i feel sorry for you. Monster Munch is an awesome variety of crisps over here in the uk.

on topic: thats what happens when you reak the rules...
 

bjj hero

New member
Feb 4, 2009
3,180
0
0
psrdirector said:
bjj hero said:
psrdirector said:
:p i was more mentioning that informing on people for some sort of authority can also be done for good, and not just evil :p
You don't have to tell me. I'd dob my next door neighbor in as a Montenegrin War Criminal for a Pot noodle and a packet of Monster munch.
I have no clue what on earth monster munch is....
You poor deprived child. We should launch a TV appeal.

*Sad music, black and white stills of children*

In some parts of the world there are children who have never even heard of Monster Munch [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_Munch], never mind tasting the pickled onion goodness.
For just £2 a month...
 

Actual

New member
Jun 24, 2008
1,220
0
0
psrdirector said:
That looks weird, pickled onion? never heard of the company, but now i have an image to put with it. for some reason seems british to me
It is British though I'm told Walkers is owned by an American company called Lays.

And pickled onion is a popular flavour of crisps here. (potato chip for the yanks)
 

Desaari

New member
Feb 24, 2009
288
0
0
My take on this is that Blizzard is just trying to appear to be supporting their older games because they are releasing sequels soon. I've seen a fairly large influx of new players in Diablo 2, no doubt people wanting to learn more about the story, lore, and gameplay before Diablo 3 is released. I believe Blizzard are trying to capitalize on this by appearing to still be supporting the game, with the release of a rather pointless patch and now this.

Not that these bans weren't necessary; if they've finally gotten rid of the spam bots I'll be pleased. But the fact of the matter is that the previous 2 patches were released 2 and 5 years ago respectively. And fair enough, it's an old game, and Blizzard North was dissolved, but this new patch and now these bans are little more than a marketing ploy to make Blizzard look like supportive developers, which they have not been.
 

Valiance

New member
Jan 14, 2009
3,823
0
0
Not all third-party programs are hacks.

Skilled Starcraft players used to use 3rd party programs such as PenguinPlug to have enhanced features such as first-person replays, showing you specifically what the player saw on his screen, what units he selected and what orders he gave them, or auto-replay saving, or in-game APM measurement, or a warning when you weren't spending as much money as you should be, or if you were getting close to your supply cap and should start spawning more overlords before your army actually NEEDS more overlords (because it will later.)

Or they'd use Hamachi or iCCup or PGT servers instead of Battle.net servers.

Ironically enough, Blizzard proves that they DON'T care by releasing a patch that stops these types of programs from working. Then their patch fixes 2 minor issues and adds in ~25% of the features that the third party programs had, and people need to start coding again.

If the game was designed well in the first place, or had the effort put into it, two guys with free time shouldn't need to design a program to allow Broodwar to load in a window. It should just have a windowed mode that Blizz created with their money silos that they're too busy swimming in to fix latency issues or add features that the player-base had been asking for.

Unfortunately, Blizzard just bans you for using things like this.

Now, on the other hand, maphacks are understandably bad, or mineralhacks or speedhacks and such.

But a program that just takes information that the game already knows and that the player already knows and makes it easier to notice, comprehend, and understand? That isn't cheating.

If it was, Blizzard wouldn't allow UI addons like Arena Unit Frames, ForteXorcist, and DBM. In fact, they wouldn't allow any UI modification in WoW, or macro scripting, or G15 keyboards.

The truth of the matter is that they try to let something like Starcraft grow due to player creativity - UMS maps, melee maps, a full-fledged map editor, etc... But then players need to create their OWN map editor like SCMDraft or StarForge in order to do these things. If someone mods their game, they can still play it on battle.net, but only with other plays with those same mods.

If someone creates a third-party program to help them learn (BW Chart, say) or a channel chat room moderation bot, it's apparently a terrible terrible thing. And I don't like the double standard.

That said, if all 320,000 were hackers, I'd be pleased with this ban. But I get the feeling most of them were just average people like you and me who found out a way to have more fun without overshadowing other players or competing with them in an incorrect fashion - wallclimbing, perhaps, or rocket boots + parachute cloak to get from lumber mill to gold mine?

When all is said and done, I personally don't violate the terms of service and wasn't affected by this ban, but I'm sure some of my old friends who still play Starcraft in a somewhat competitive fashion were banned for all the wrong reasons.
 

NLS

Norwegian Llama Stylist
Jan 7, 2010
1,594
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
Nimzar said:
Umm... just FYI a system like this was once implemented in East Germany.
Really? They had Battle.net in East Germany?
Kampf.Netzwerk from Schneesturm never really caught on, due to the low sales of Sternkraft and the lack of online gamers in East Germany.

OT: That's one hell of a big ban, but I'm glad cheaters get their justice in the end.