Yes I edited the 20 man out earlier considering BC was so long ago and got its player cap confused with original ZG. Also mounts are account shared in the new xpac so when I earned it on my warrior back in BC I would get it on all my chars who possess the riding skill.Mega Messiah said:Zul'Aman was a 10 man.toomuchnothing said:Its too bad because I would have liked a reason to ride around on my old ZA20 bear mount on my DK.
Death Knights couldn't get it because it was removed from ZA when Patch 3.0 rolled around.
Don't lie so blatantly.
Cinematic looks nice. Blizzard's cinematics always look nice. Game's still stagnant as hell though so I'll pass.
I'm not convinced they ever had any good writers to begin with... though I'm sure they're better off than the VO department. Oh lord.SecretNegative said:Wow, Blizzard is really trying to make their games seem as repulsive as ever.
Thousands upon thousands of people complain that f*cking Pandas are too childish, and what do Blizzard do? Put up the trailer which seems as if it was a trailer for a kids movie, a bad one.
Sorry if I lost faith in you Blizzard, but this is just ludicrous, is it not possible to hire one single guy in the story department who actually knows how to write?
Well I didn't know about account shared mounts so I'll give you the benefit of the doubt on that one. I haven't been on to see what's changed since like, mid WOTLK era.toomuchnothing said:Yes I edited the 20 man out earlier considering BC was so long ago. Also mounts are account shared in the new xpac so when I earned it on my warrior back in BC I would get it on all my chars who possess the riding skill.Mega Messiah said:Zul'Aman was a 10 man.toomuchnothing said:Its too bad because I would have liked a reason to ride around on my old ZA20 bear mount on my DK.
Death Knights couldn't get it because it was removed from ZA when Patch 3.0 rolled around.
Don't lie so blatantly.
Cinematic looks nice. Blizzard's cinematics always look nice. Game's still stagnant as hell though so I'll pass.
They can try forever, but nothing's going to top the glowing blue dragon-zombie. Compared to other representations of dragons and fantasy creatures, that one's just a bit special.Aeshi said:You'd think the best way to top Sindragosa from WotLK
I dunno, I reckon a Turtle big enough to eat the aforementioned Dragon in one bite while carrying an entire zone (including several villages) on its back could give her a run for her money. Dragons are dime-a-dozen, Colossal Turtles significantly less so.fix-the-spade said:They can try forever, but nothing's going to top the glowing blue dragon-zombie. Compared to other representations of dragons and fantasy creatures, that one's just a bit special.Aeshi said:You'd think the best way to top Sindragosa from WotLK
Pft, Great A'tuin isn't impressed.Aeshi said:I dunno, I reckon a Turtle big enough to eat the aforementioned Dragon in one bite while carrying an entire zone (including several villages) on its back could give her a run for her money. Dragons are dime-a-dozen, Colossal Turtles significantly less so.fix-the-spade said:They can try forever, but nothing's going to top the glowing blue dragon-zombie. Compared to other representations of dragons and fantasy creatures, that one's just a bit special.Aeshi said:You'd think the best way to top Sindragosa from WotLK
Well you see people did want them to add Pandaren. But Kung Fu Panda came out so now they're too mainstream.Compatriot Block said:Blizzard really can't win. People have been asking for Pandaren since BC, and they've been a part of the game's universe since well before the Kung Fu Panda movie. Now they finally get it, and legions of children are bitching about "pandering to kids with Kung Fu Panda crap."