And like I said, unless people just don't buy the game (considering the foaming at the mouth seizures people have been having at the first hint of it) which seems incredibly unlikely, then Acti/Blizz will do whatever they want and thumb their nose while they do it.Jason Santora said:Yes, 100% of the people playing online have bought the game. That makes it a complete success.manythings said:It's still working or Ubisoft so unless people just don't buy Diablo 3 I can't see them caring or revising the idea for whatever comes next.
http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/view/111951-Ubisoft-Says-Always-On-DRM-A-SuccessHalyah said:Quite frankly if he was genuinely surprised by the negative reactions then he is possibly one of the dumbest people I've ever heard of. The fact that people reacted this way was inevitable the moment the 'always online' part was mentioned, especially after Ubisoft got so much flack for the exact same crap.
That explains how single player characters made their way into Closed Battle.Net in Diablo 2!!!Vaccine said:It's not about DRM, it'd be about cheating the Auction House system they're going to be using, what would be the point of the AH being flooded with duplicated items from a single player file, this would also be the same reason for mods I assume.
Exactly if my internet suddenly died out and stayed offline for days or weeks per say the game that i paid a lot for suddenly becomes as useless as a bricked PSP.Crimsane said:"And, at the end of the day, how many people are going to want to do that?"
Idk, thousands of people?
Then make it so single-player accounts can't use the trading function.Vaccine said:It's not about DRM, it'd be about cheating the Auction House system they're going to be using, what would be the point of the AH being flooded with duplicated items from a single player file, this would also be the same reason for mods I assume.
Probably he just says he was surprised or didn't read any complains about SC2 and all Ubisoft games with always online implementation.Metal Brother said:Totally agreed. Either he's lying or (assuming positive intent) seriously failed to do market research.Alphakirby said:Wait,how the hell was he surprised,sometimes people just want to play by themselves and on the go (if you have a laptop like mine),Hell I would be pissed too if I was planning on getting that game
You know, they seperated open and closed battle.net and could do just the same with D3 and if you really think it isn't about DRM and control of the customer you are pretty naive.Vaccine said:It's not about DRM, it'd be about cheating the Auction House system they're going to be using, what would be the point of the AH being flooded with duplicated items from a single player file, this would also be the same reason for mods I assume.