He broke UK law. It is a crime to attack or spy on another nation without the governments permission. If he gets off with no time, America will assume that he had the UK's permission and hurt relations. Nothing serious, just the next time the UK wants a criminal extradited for some 'non-violent' crime. We might decide that it is a human right violation. Next time Britain needs a favor in the UN for something (other then something major of course), Britain is not that close of ally anymore.exessmirror said:as far as i see it he didn't do anything wrong in GB as such he should not be tried. from what you write i assume you are an american in that case you should stop thinking you are the world. you are not the same as you where 10 years ago. if not why so pro American? i have nothing against americans but all good (and bad) things come from Canada now daysscotth266 said:Fine, try him in the UK then. So long as we're not mistakenly under the assumption that you can hack Pentagon computers and get off with absolutely no repercussions just because you have a disorder.
captcha: super star, the guy is now captcha
Now I will say that my examples were a bit extreme. But I must wonder if the roles were reversed, would you not be demanding justice for your government?