British Government Proposes Universal Ban on Net Porn

Goro

New member
Oct 15, 2009
234
0
0
Country
Australia
The government has clearly forgotten they exist at our sufferance, and they were chosen to represent our wishes. This whole thing of a ruling class makes mockery of democracy, and for 1 person to have the power to remove the freedom and choices of an entire nation is utter nonsense. The hung parliaments in England and Australia have shown the populace had to vote, but wanted neither in power. That's the trouble with Bicameral systems, no legitimate third choice.... Who wants to start the Sensible Party with me?
 

geldonyetich

New member
Aug 2, 2006
3,715
0
0
I'm not sure an ISP could ban porn. There's so many hundreds of thousands of porn websites out there that finding all of them on a list, keeping that list updated, and the logistics of utilizing that list, would be perhaps beyond available technology and available manpower to do.
 

SilverUchiha

New member
Dec 25, 2008
1,604
0
0
Censorship = Evil

I've always been against censorship because it ruins art while trying to crusade against things like porn because some people don't get that the line between art and "smut" isn't really clear all the time.

Besides, whatever happened to raising kids normally and not enabling them with some sort of pathetic Nanny-State government?
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
RhombusHatesYou said:
Therumancer said:
and we all know about Australia
If the usual commentary on these forums whenever some censorship is mentioned is anything to go by most people know fuck all about the situation in Australia.
Well, The Escapist itself has run a number of articles on it as things have happened, so I think the community in general is fairly well informed, unless the news soures The Escapist was using had it horribly wrong (which I didn't see much outcry about when things had been posted).
 

v3n0mat3

New member
Jul 30, 2008
938
0
0
So Big Brother is watching you watching porn, if this passes? I mean, you HAVE to specifically request it. So my bet is that to the persons that do request it, they must be watching them.
 

dashiz94

New member
Apr 14, 2009
681
0
0
And now, to transcribe my thoughts:

"British Government Proposes Universal Ban on Net Porn" Huh, sound pretty retarded

*read article*

HAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA HAHAHAHAHAH WHAT THE HELL IS THIS SHIT?! OH MY GOD THIS IS TOO FUNNY! HA!
 

RhombusHatesYou

Surreal Estate Agent
Mar 21, 2010
7,595
1,914
118
Between There and There.
Country
The Wide, Brown One.
Therumancer said:
RhombusHatesYou said:
Therumancer said:
and we all know about Australia
If the usual commentary on these forums whenever some censorship is mentioned is anything to go by most people know fuck all about the situation in Australia.
Well, The Escapist itself has run a number of articles on it as things have happened, so I think the community in general is fairly well informed, unless the news soures The Escapist was using had it horribly wrong (which I didn't see much outcry about when things had been posted).
Well The 'Pist has run a number of articles on the subject, so yes, the information has been there... but considering the number of people who seem to think that the ISP level filter is already in place or is still politically a going concern, I wouldn't say they've actually bothered to read more than a slightly inflamatory headline or two.
 

Therumancer

Citation Needed
Nov 28, 2007
9,909
0
0
fat tony said:
The government has clearly forgotten they exist at our sufferance, and they were chosen to represent our wishes. This whole thing of a ruling class makes mockery of democracy, and for 1 person to have the power to remove the freedom and choices of an entire nation is utter nonsense. The hung parliaments in England and Australia have shown the populace had to vote, but wanted neither in power. That's the trouble with Bicameral systems, no legitimate third choice.... Who wants to start the Sensible Party with me?
Well as I understand things, the very nature of the system means that it's not going to change radically/reform it's entire structure through bureaucracy because the people in power or who benefit from the system would pretty much have to agree to step down.

People laugh at the USA and our right to keep and bear arms, but this is the kind of situation it exists to deal with. If the goverment goes that far against the will of the people a civil insurrection is inevitable. If the military winds up backing the goverment (a craps shoot since it's totally made up of volunteers) it might be able to stop a popular revolt, but by the time it's over the country will be a third world hellhole. I mean sure, civilians with Small Arms aren't going to say be able to take out tank visions or supersonic jets, but if you bomb New York City (the harbour of which is a major asset to the US) into rubble to stop a popular revolt, and do the same thing in other major places, what exactly will the goverment wind up in control of? It certainly won't be the most powerful nation in the world, and the authority of the victors will amount to little internationally, because it's not like they are going to command respect from atop a pile of ruins. :p

I don't think there is enough anti-goverment sentiment in the UK for a popular revolt to begin with to be honest, but to be honest if there ever was I don't think it much matters, and plans like forming a party that will "change everything" are always doomed to fail because an inherantly broken system is still broken no matter who is using it.

In the end it comes down to both whether you hate what is going on enough to actually get up and do something about it, at the risk of your life and freedom, and of course whether or not you have the abillity to actually do anything if you wanted to. It's always the hard part, getting people to stand up and act with you (or to act alone, hoping it's the spark that ignites something), but even getting that far depends on there being some chance of being able to do anything.

I feel sorry for you guys in the UK, really I do. Right now us Americans foolishly sit on our keisters and won't rally for anything really (despite other people around the world seeing us as fanatics), however if we ever did, there is a lot we could actually do. Any one of us could walk into a goverment building with a firearm and cut loose (though it rarely happens, obviously). In the UK, as I said there isn't much you can do except get up hat in hand and humbly request change while the powers that be take that hat defecate in it.
 

Arkhangelsk

New member
Mar 1, 2009
7,702
0
0
What next, will the government keep us from swimming in the pool until half an hour after we eat? The government is not a bloody nanny! When will politicians and parents realize that the only real responsibility anyone has to take is the parents. Not the people who make porn sites, because, let's face the facts, people like porn! If my mom was hellbent on keeping me from porn, she should have kept a firm grip on my computer. But did she? No. And if she then had a problem with me still watching porn, who's fault would that be? I'll tell you who's fault it isn't. The Internet.

The government wants to regulate games for the kids sake, it wants to regulate movies for the kids sake, it wants to regulate porn for the kids sake, will parents ever get off their lazy asses stop to think that maybe it's the parents fault that so many children watch 2girls1cup at such an early age and masturbate wildly to videos of [insert name of notorious porn star here]? God, the government pisses me off.
 

SovietSecrets

iDrink, iSmoke, iPill
Nov 16, 2008
3,975
0
0
What a sad day. Shows just how lazy parents are getting and how much the government thinks it needs to be in everything.
 

DSK-

New member
May 13, 2010
2,431
0
0
I finally get it! This is a scheme the Government are concocting in order to start taxing pornography!

Why not? they tax every-fucking-thing else :/





(Alright, they don't but it's still too much)
 

Quazimofo

New member
Aug 30, 2010
1,370
0
0
Samurai Goomba said:
Xzi said:
Your children can go fuck themselves.
Sounds to me like that was the problem.

ba-dum-tish
you almost made me piss myself with that one. and i am really only commenting so i can find this easier but whatever, its still damn funny
 

WingedIncubus

New member
Nov 5, 2010
229
0
0
The Grim Ace said:
I hope none of the politicians here in the U.S. here about this being seriously being considered, if so, the internet is about to get a whole lot more barren. I'm going to hope that government ineptitude steps in and keeps this from happening in anyway that would be overly intrusive, I also hope anyone who thinks farming out raising of children to the government gets thrown into a pit.
I doubt it, it would be a serious encroachment to the First Amendement if the government would attempt such a thing, it would be striken down into flames by the Supreme Court.

Plus. pornography was declared not obscene a long time ago, as long as it targets consensual adults and the scenes being portrayed do not involve anything illegal.