Call of Duty Elite on PC Delayed and Debilitated

exobook

New member
Sep 28, 2011
258
0
0
Orcboyphil said:
No centrally trusted source for stats? Well I really wish us PC gamers had a small developer known for only a few of very awesome and influential FPS's, to create us a secure digital distribution system in order for us to have such a centrally located place.
Yes but activision would want it own proprietary system so it can control it fully, so steam is out

On a side not how would such a system interact with a steam version of modern warfare?
 

AnarchistFish

New member
Jul 25, 2011
1,500
0
0
It's articles like this that I say all the time that makes me wonder how PC users can be so much more elitist.
 

Waaghpowa

Needs more Dakka
Apr 13, 2010
3,073
0
0
OH NO! How will we get our access to map packs and their online stat tracking system?

Anyway, I'm pretty sure Bungie did similar stat tracking on their site, and Battlefield 3 has battlelog and they're both for free.
 

Michael Hirst

New member
May 18, 2011
552
0
0
I'm not too surprised but I've grown past caring for COD, the elite service is just garbage anyway and I won't be investing in the series ever again (MW2 was the last one I bought and only because I got it for £25 instead of the usual £45)
 

deth2munkies

New member
Jan 28, 2009
1,066
0
0
The_root_of_all_evil said:
deth2munkies said:
PC gamers should be used to getting the shaft from FPS developers who care nothing for the PC because console shooters sell better.
Does that honestly make it better? Should Australian gamers just get used to never having 18+ games?

It's a very bad argument that states "Suck it up". For a start, where would the Escapist be without people arguing the toss all day ;)
The 3rd follows from the first two.
 
Feb 13, 2008
19,430
0
0
deth2munkies said:
The_root_of_all_evil said:
deth2munkies said:
PC gamers should be used to getting the shaft from FPS developers who care nothing for the PC because console shooters sell better.
Does that honestly make it better? Should Australian gamers just get used to never having 18+ games?

It's a very bad argument that states "Suck it up". For a start, where would the Escapist be without people arguing the toss all day ;)
The 3rd follows from the first two.
Which from what now?
 

Troublesome Lagomorph

The Deadliest Bunny
May 26, 2009
27,258
0
0
Andy Chalk said:
"We're as committed as ever to the PC..."
LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLO-
Ok, not that much of a loss, anyway. They've been alienating the PC crowd, and the PC crowd has... you know.... BETTER games to play besides shovelware shooters. So, no real loss...
Waaghpowa said:
OH NO! How will we get our access to map packs and their online stat tracking system?

Anyway, I'm pretty sure Bungie did similar stat tracking on their site, and Battlefield 3 has battlelog and they're both for free.
Bungie has had stat tracking one their site since Halo 2, and later introduced heat maps. So yeah, this is just dumb.
 

Frostbite3789

New member
Jul 12, 2010
1,778
0
0
Awexsome said:
BF shafts console players and CoD shafts PC players. Neither really intended to, just that they were designed with the opposite foremost in mind.
Being limited in terms of the tech is considered shafting now?

Edit: Also, your name makes me think of Frisky Dingo. Consequently, I now want to watch Frisky Dingo.
 

Not G. Ivingname

New member
Nov 18, 2009
6,368
0
0
Wait, the WEBSITE that has VIDEOS and can connect with your has REDUCED functionality on the system that has had that kind of thing the longest?

Activision, you are FAIL.
 

imperialreign

New member
Mar 23, 2010
348
0
0
Y'know, after sampling MW2 and BO during Steam's free MP weekends, I could honestly give a rat's ass. i don't expect MW3 to be anything stellar, and more than likely simply catering to the n00bz that'd rather go around accusing skilled players of hacking instead of attempting to improve their game. Nothing against newbies in general, just the bitchy ones that want everything simple and handed to them on a silver platter. CoD4 and WaW were the last two fun installments to play, IMHO, that still felt somewhat balanced enough that everyone can have a decent time.

But, that being said - have developers completely forgotten about the 3rd-party anti-cheating services available to the PC community (i.e. PunkBuster)? These (as much as some players may hate them) do their job of keeping things legit, and sure they can be a PITA even for us legit players if your connection is getting a little squirelly . . . but, still, considering I only play on secure servers (with current up-to-date patched games), I've never really encountered an issue where hacking is a major problem . . .

. . . besides, with dedicated servers, there's usually an admin close at hand, and as soon as a hacker does pop up, they're permabanned quickly. Much faster on independent servers than on sanctioned servers.

But, god forbid we get full dedicated server support, too . . .
 

Awexsome

Were it so easy
Mar 25, 2009
1,549
0
0
Frostbite3789 said:
Awexsome said:
BF shafts console players and CoD shafts PC players. Neither really intended to, just that they were designed with the opposite foremost in mind.
Being limited in terms of the tech is considered shafting now?

Edit: Also, your name makes me think of Frisky Dingo. Consequently, I now want to watch Frisky Dingo.
Excuses are excuses.

The PC experience is superior to the console because it was designed like that. High end graphics while having the 360 look like crap unless you go out of your way to install the patch thing it like no other game makes you do, severely limited player count, increased bugs and glitches appearing on console versions, ect...

You can try and justify it all you want but being shafted and inferior versions are shafted and inferior versions.

To justify this I could say that with PC's getting their customizeability with their dedicated servers being owned by players it does throw the chances of CoD's controlled competitive experience into more flux than the much fewer modders on consoles do. By designing a system that favors the console it ends up inconviencing the PC. Exact same thing.
 

Treblaine

New member
Jul 25, 2008
8,682
0
0
"Elite for PC will be about access to your own stats, or those of your friends. Basically establishing a circle of trust. And because it will have some reduced functionality, it will be free for everyone."



Seriously, who cares if "MaxiMoscow69" has the tops score out of several million players? Who cares about bullshit prizes that you have almost zero chance of winning? This is honestly much more of a "PC Way" of doing things, props to that.

This is WAY better and FREE!!
 

Rijo

New member
Dec 2, 2008
23
0
0
You know 73 minutes after the launch, some 13 year old nerd in a basement somewheres in Ohio is going to be cracking that patch they're working on ATM. Really isnt anything new. Boosters and Hackers are always embedded in CoD games (at least the PC one ive seen).

Guess ill just grab a quick XBox copy till the PC one comes out.
 

Metalrocks

New member
Jan 15, 2009
2,406
0
0
so to make sure i dont misunderstand here something.... is elite required to play the game or you can play COD without it?
 

Rijo

New member
Dec 2, 2008
23
0
0
Metalrocks said:
so to make sure i dont misunderstand here something.... is elite required to play the game or you can play COD without it?
Think of COD Elite as a Add-on or a Tool. But if you like to Non-Elite Vs Elite http://www.callofduty.com/elite/whats-included
PS... if you do it by the 13th of this month you get the Founder Member pretty much baiting you in with a XP buff and Gun Camo's.

BECAUSE WE LIKE SHINEY THINGS DAMN!
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
Honestly, this doesn't bother me in the slightest. Best statistics among a circle of friends makes more sense anyways, Elite sounds like the equivalent of Cosmetic items in micro-transactions, and Map packs are generally a waste anyways and hey, they are still available. I don't begrudge CoD for this in the slightest.