Psychosocial said:
ChromeAlchemist said:
Well if God*cough*Carmack says so...
Psychosocial said:
Well, not to try and start something, but you could very much consider the PS3 a failure, when you compare it to the PS1 and PS2. So it would only make sense if Sony are the ones to try and rush to get their next console out first.
The fact remains that because Sony won the format war, the PS3 will
not be a failure, and to me, that's just the way it is. They'll gain market share near the end of it, and I think they'll get ahead of the 360. Natal is make or break for Microsoft.
I were speaking mostly about sales. They won BIG time on the sales front with both the PS1 and PS2, but this time they're in last place. I agree that Natal is a huge make or break for Microsoft, but it definetely seems as if they're not just fucking around with Natal.
They aren't. The problem is more the case of will this appeal for long enough to capitalise on the non-gamer market (which they admitted they will be doing), because the non-gamer market is volatile. Microsoft are certainly taking this seriously though, which is why I don't think it will fail.
As for sales, at the end of the day the PS3 came out a year late and it was far too similar to an already existing console on the market, the 360. When you look at it, this was almost in reverse last generation. To the average gamer, why should they care about buying another console when they have a 360 and an arse load of games to last them years to come?
Because it will soon become a cheap Blu Ray player, and that's where my belief that it will not be a failure in terms of sales comes in. IMHO if the PS2 couldn't play DVDs it wouldn't have gotten anywhere as many sales as it did. Blu Ray will come into prominence and the PS3 will regain lost sales in time. Yes, it didn't 'boom' from the get-go, like the other two did, but this is a different generation altogether, and this one is a slow burner.