Characters they need to kill off.

Recommended Videos

ultrachicken

New member
Dec 22, 2009
4,301
0
0
oplinger said:
My femshep in ME3.

..She's not the same as she was in ME1 and ME2, she's all...eager for attention and..flirty. It's awkward when you didn't pursue any romances at all with anyone in the previous games. And I don't get any neutral choices..

It just makes her awkward :( her time has come. ..I think I'll go get her killed and just...never go back :'(
Seeing as the persuasion system runs on reputation points rather than paragon/renegade points in ME3, I don't get where you're coming from. If you don't want to be flirty, pick the other option. No consequences whatsoever.
 

The_Lost_King

New member
Oct 7, 2011
1,504
0
0
ultrachicken said:
The_Lost_King said:
This guy was completely flawed. Was he interesting? That kid is also my answer to topic he can go die in a hole but first tell me where it is so I can piss on his grave.
I hate that demotivational poster so much. It's completely inaccurate, and anyone who actually played the game should know that, yet it keeps getting regurgitated all over the internet. Also, I'm pretty certain that
the Star Child did die in the ending, because it was based in the crucible, which exploded.
It isn't inaccurate one day he WILL destroy all life because the cycle is infinite and the species to evolve are finite.
 

TaintedSaint

New member
Mar 16, 2011
230
0
0
Thetwistedendgame said:
Doctor Who. Not only does he need to get killed off, he will. And then he will reincarnate. Again.
Indeed Matt Smith and Moffet need to go. I have watched all the old serials and moffets stuff does not even remotely feel correct.
 

ultrachicken

New member
Dec 22, 2009
4,301
0
0
The_Lost_King said:
That particular complaint wasn't in the demotivational poster, but it is still incorrect. Also, put that shit in spoilers.

The cycle is that every 50,000 years the Reapers destroy all spacefaring civilizations. So unless every single piece of life discovers spaceflight at the same time, the cycle cannot destroy all life.

The purpose of the reapers is not to destroy all spacefaring life BEFORE some other synthetics get in on the action, it's to preserve organic life in any way they can. Starchild's theory is that eventually spacefaring life will create synthetic life, which will inevitably rebel at some point and commit mass genocide. The destruction of organic life is guaranteed. The ONLY way to preserve organic life is to shove the genetic material into a Reaper. That is the Starchild's motivation. Yes, it has serious problems with it, and Bioware didn't explain nearly enough about the cycle, but that demotivational poster, and your post, are just flat-out wrong.
 

Relish in Chaos

New member
Mar 7, 2012
2,658
0
0
Sega don?t need to murder Sonic; they just need to give him a kick up the backside and start making good games again. Which they?ve been beginning to do with Colours and Generations. He can work in 3D; it?s just that they?ve been trying the wrong ideas for too long.

What they do need to do is kill off the extraneous Sonic supporting characters. So basically, anyone that isn?t Sonic, Tails, Knuckles and Eggman.

Princess Peach. Kill her off and bring back the much-overlooked Princess Daisy and Tatanga. I?m really starting to wonder if she just gets off on being kidnapped. However, they toyed with interesting ideas in Super Mario Land, Daisy?s only received exposure in the spin-off titles, and where the fuck did Tatanga go?

Waluigi. ?Nuff said.

Crash Bandicoot. Similar to Sonic, only that I think his last good game was Twinsanity or something and he doesn?t have anywhere near the legacy that Sonic does.

Pikachu. Does Pokemon even need a mascot anymore? Granted, I guess that?s like asking if Nintendo even needs Mario anymore, but what I?m saying is?FUCK PIKACHU. He?s so annoying. Either evolve him into Raichu, who?s much better, or just get rid of both Ash and Pikachu for good.
 

Plucky

Enthusiast Magician
Jan 16, 2011
448
0
0
Bowser Jr., sure the Mario games may or may not have much of a story, but it feels too much of a slap in the face where the only goons he has in the platformer games are either....

- Aliens
- Giant Ghosts
- Giant Metal Balls
- Giant Balls that are actually made of Ice instead
- Alien Plants
- Mid Boss....err Boom Boom and his distaff counterpart...whatever her name is.
- Bosses with Tanuki Tails
- a Random Enemy made big? (is that even his Schtick?, or was that only the Yoshi Island games only...?)

Or maybe Nintendo eased out of using the Koopalings in a main 3d game was because they had too much character, Bowser Jr may have been so thin that he was only going things "for his father" whereas the other Koopalings may actually want those pieces of land as part of their own, or the only other logical solution is that the Koopalings would never work in the 3d games unless it went into a linear formula so that defeating them was absolutely needed. (and indirectly, the Mid Bosses may be multiple Boom Booms, but there is only ONE Jr)

Also one thing i don't see is how they went on for so long without refering to the fact that Bowser may possibly be a necromancer turtle kappa-dragon lich...thing, Dry Bones doesn't even seem to exist until Mario Bros 3....or to be technical, possibly the skeleton seagulls from Yoshi's Island. (or maybe he only has those powers, if he has some sort of object of power like a Shine Sprite/Star/Galaxy Star/Magic Sceptre...or a Tanuki Leaf...?)