Oh, just run with the joke.Colour Scientist said:It means I can acknowledge that I have it easier than some people without getting super pissy because someone dared to point out that I might not face as many or the same challenges in society as someone of a different race/sexuality/religion/social status/disability etc.
One must never joke about one's privilege.Zachary Amaranth said:Oh, just run with the joke.Colour Scientist said:It means I can acknowledge that I have it easier than some people without getting super pissy because someone dared to point out that I might not face as many or the same challenges in society as someone of a different race/sexuality/religion/social status/disability etc.you were so reveling in it.
True enough. I've been homeless, impoverished, currently live in a foreign country in a shit apartment I can barely afford, surrounded by people whose language I don't speak, am struggling with debt, and have almost no friends, yet I still rate 55 because I'm a white heterosexual male. Irony is that my fiercest competition for getting a better job consists primarily of women of varying races because of where I live(because military spouses get first crack at any government jobs overseas). So yeah... I guess I'm privileged compared to people who are living in third world countries and people whose basic identity makes close minded people uncomfortable, but I don't feel that privilege is doing much for me right now.ClockworkPenguin said:What's the perspective. National?,Global?, Historical? Because on a historical scale, I could live in a dumpster and my life would still be in the top 50%.
It might very well be enough.generals3 said:What is this "wealth of your experience" precisely and how do you share it? Because if it comes down to "wealth" itself i already pay taxes (and a high percentage at that), isn't that enough?VaporWare said:You aren't (or, at least, shouldn't be) being asked to rise up and take personal responsibility for apartheid. You are being asked to consider the ways in which you've benefited from the way things are, and how you might be able to share the wealth of your experience with those who have not so benefited.
Not just dudes. Girls can be "cishet scum" as well.DANGER- MUST SILENCE said:I'm quite surprised, but I guess this just goes to show "privilege" is not secret Tumblr code for "bias against straight white dudes."
Well ideologically i fully endorse it, pragmatically speaking that's an other question. (If i favor a reduction in taxation it's not so much because i don't want to help the less fortunate but because seeing companies move away, lay off people and outsource production due to the cost of labor makes me think it's causing more harm than good)VaporWare said:It might very well be enough.
What constitutes the wealth of one's experience is generally down to the individual...I can't evaluate how you, specifically, have benefited from the way the world is today, so I cannot suggest how you might share your particular fortune with others.
If work and pay your taxes, thus supporting government funded programs that help the disadvantaged, that may be all you can and/or should do. It may even be more than you feel is morally obligatory. It is, in any case, morally praiseworthy to the extent that you choose to endorse it.
Well I could take the time out of my day. After all as my Drill instructor used to say "No, it's not that you didn't have the time, you didn't take the time!". But at the same time i want my free time and since my taxes help funding organization and people for whom helping others is their paying job I think it's better to leave it to them. Otherwise i'd be just trading in my happiness for the one of the less fortunate (by having to sacrifice activities i'd like to do more) and in the grand scheme of things there would be no real gain becoming more miserable for others to be less, as it doesn't create an increase of net happiness, which ultimately what i stand behind.That's not true for everyone though. You might not be able to take the time out of your day, and it might be in that regard that you yourself could stand some relief. Individuals have to decide for themselves to what extent they are willing and able to give a hand up to higher ground, we can only ask each other to give careful and honest thought to the matter, while not to make too many assumptions about people who aren't in their position in life.
And I would say that this is an entirely valid evaluation. If the objective is a net increase in happiness or well-being, and your position puts you in a state where further assistance would result in a zero sum change at best, then it is of no use to ask you to do more than you are already doing.generals3 said:But at the same time i want my free time and since my taxes help funding organization and people for whom helping others is their paying job I think it's better to leave it to them. Otherwise i'd be just trading in my happiness for the one of the less fortunate (by having to sacrifice activities i'd like to do more) and in the grand scheme of things there would be no real gain becoming more miserable for others to be less doesn't create an increase of net happiness which ultimately what i stand behind.