I nearly accidentally cut my nipple off with my own fingernail.
You bastard. I just spent the first 10 minutes of my workday refreshing that page trying to find a Cronenbergian result. And that's not to say that I'm done trying, just complaining that I don't need this in my life right now.AI making people more trustworthy than actual people
Fake faces created by AI look more trustworthy than real people
Synthetic human faces are so convincing they can fool even trained observers, and they may be highly effective for use in scamswww.newscientist.com
View attachment 5559
And if you wanna play around with a face randomiser, here's a link that generates one every time it's loaded. Once in a while it messes up with frightening Cronenbergian results too...
See what I mean? Skynet will use this as just another data point to justify it's position for mass extinction.I nearly accidentally cut my nipple off with my own fingernail.
I think I got one! The guy looks real, but what in 01000111 01101111 01100100's green earth is that to the right?? It has hair, whatever it is...And if you wanna play around with a face randomiser, here's a link that generates one every time it's loaded. Once in a while it messes up with frightening Cronenbergian results too...
Yeah it seems the main culprit is the background algorithm for going squiffy. Only got a couple of examples saved at mo, more like weird alien photo bombersI think I got one! The guy looks real, but what in 01000111 01101111 01100100's green earth is that to the right?? It has hair, whatever it is...
I'm noticing now it appears to have problems with non-focal subjects. A lot of half faces on the perimeter of the frame get thrown into a blender.
View attachment 5562
EDIT: I have done zero word yet today...
View attachment 5564
It's both scary and then wierd when you realize Disney keeps trying to do this to Mark Hamill and keeps....not doing it well. Meanwhile, Sebastian Stan is crying somewhere.AI making people more trustworthy than actual people
Fake faces created by AI look more trustworthy than real people
Synthetic human faces are so convincing they can fool even trained observers, and they may be highly effective for use in scamswww.newscientist.com
View attachment 5559
And if you wanna play around with a face randomiser, here's a link that generates one every time it's loaded. Once in a while it messes up with frightening Cronenbergian results too...
This is instant creepypasta gold right here.I think I got one! The guy looks real, but what in 01000111 01101111 01100100's green earth is that to the right?? It has hair, whatever it is...
I'm noticing now it appears to have problems with non-focal subjects. A lot of half faces on the perimeter of the frame get thrown into a blender.
View attachment 5562
EDIT: I have done zero word yet today...
View attachment 5564
We got derailed; I can't imagine the force necessary to nearly cut one's own nipple of with a finger nail. Please explain.I nearly accidentally cut my nipple off with my own fingernail.
You know how when you go to pick up a carton of milk or juice and you think it's full so your arm's muscle memory processes it with the appropriate amount of strength needed to lift it, but then it turns out the carton is actually empty so your arms shoots up? It was kinda like that. A normal rapid arm movement that I'd performed countless times without ever noticing, only this time it was too close to my manboob and with a fingernail that had grown too long on my thumb.We got derailed; I can't imagine the force necessary to nearly cut one's own nipple of with a finger nail. Please explain.
Ah, gotcha. To empathize, a couple years ago, during one of my signature spaz moments trying to swat a mosquito, I slapped myself directly in my testicles.You know how when you go to pick up a carton of milk or juice and you think it's full so your arm's muscle memory processes it with the appropriate amount of strength needed to lift it, but then it turns out the carton is actually empty so your arms shoots up? It was kinda like that. A normal rapid arm movement that I'd performed countless times without ever noticing, only this time it was too close to my manboob and with a fingernail that had grown too long on my thumb.
More likely Skynet would realize how likely it is that we'll just exterminate ourselves (via bleeding out through accidental severing of nipples) and just wait us out.See what I mean? Skynet will use this as just another data point to justify it's position for mass extinction.
Really, my first answer to Fermis Paradox is that if there are aliens, they're letting us destroy ourselves because they don't want our insanity infecting the rest of the galaxy or they want our stuff but it's less work to just let us suicide ourselves before they come down and strip mine the planet or whatever. If we can't handle a (relatively) benign planet like earth without destroying ourselves, we sure as can't handle the desolation of space.More likely Skynet would realize how likely it is that we'll just exterminate ourselves (via bleeding out through accidental severing of nipples) and just wait us out.
I never understood the "paradox" in the Fermi Paradox. Given the vastness of the universe and our limited capabilities to adequately explore it, it's completely reasonable to think finding life on other planets, despite the likelihood of it existing is still extremely low. And the same goes for any other space-faring life that might be out there. It's like amoeba with 12-second lifespans playing "Marco Polo" in the Pacific Ocean. It should be called "Fermi Logic."Really, my first answer to Fermis Paradox is that if there are aliens, they're letting us destroy ourselves because they don't want our insanity infecting the rest of the galaxy or they want our stuff but it's less work to just let us suicide ourselves before they come down and strip mine the planet or whatever. If we can't handle a (relatively) benign planet like earth without destroying ourselves, we sure as can't handle the desolation of space.
I know the idea is that given enough time, any spacefairing species will colonize all available planets. I think the flaw is that it discounts the idea intelligent species might not want to do so for whatever reason. It feels like an inherently capitalistic/expansionist mindset that growth needs to be infinite forever rather as opposed to reaching some kind of equilibrium where enough is actually enough. "We have 5 planets. We have more then enough room and resources. No need to go colonize everything"I never understood the "paradox" in the Fermi Paradox. Given the vastness of the universe and our limited capabilities to adequately explore it, it's completely reasonable to think finding life on other planets, despite the likelihood of it existing is still extremely low. And the same goes for any other space-faring life that might be out there. It's like amoeba with 12-second lifespans playing "Marco Polo" in the Pacific Ocean. It should be called "Fermi Logic."
I think the bigger issue is the odds of two space-faring races running into each other. It would mean a similar pace of evolution, at the same time, achieving interstellar capability, AND meeting each other. Better odds of running into someone with your identical fingerprint.I know the idea is that given enough time, any spacefairing species will colonize all available planets. I think the flaw is that it discounts the idea intelligent species might not want to do so for whatever reason. It feels like an inherently capitalistic/expansionist mindset that growth needs to be infinite forever rather as opposed to reaching some kind of equilibrium where enough is actually enough. "We have 5 planets. We have more then enough room and resources. No need to go colonize everything"