Since you're apparently unwilling to do your own research about Venezuela and prefer it to be done for you in a thread about Kazakkhstan,
EE never considers the impact of arbitrary changes in credit rating made by various US-based private firms since 2012, nor does he consider the argument that those changes were politically motivated manipulations made with the intention of indirectly causing pain to the Venezuelan people.
EE claims that the Chavez government did nothing with oil revenues but hand out checks and explicitly denies that the Chavez government tried to diversify the economy away from oil. In reality, the Venezuelan government did a lot of things. The most relevant of them to EE's argument were making significant investments in agricultural production to reduce the need for imports-- the precise thing that EE claims didn't happen.
EE's video is a great explanation of what Dutch disease is. It is a mediocre and overtly simplistic source of background information on some of the relevant events that led to the economic crisis. Since it makes claims about Venezuela's actions that are demonstrably untrue, it is an exceptionally poor guide to understanding why the crisis happened, why it was as serious as it was, and how the Venezuelan government was and still is limited in how it could respond. The claim made by EE that he wasn't going to be political is laughable; his 'analysis' appears preconceived to blame the Venezuelan government and nothing else for Venezuela's economic difficulties, which is of course an intensely political conclusion.