Holy god! I'm tempted to pick one up out of sheer curiosity. I wonder, also, if these units will be as "flexible" as the originals were . . . if so
I'm curious how many users here have ever used the original C64 or C128 . . . those of us who had, I'm sure we all hold fond memories of this rig.
tehweave said:
I guess this was before my time, but... Why was the commodore 64 so amazing? First computer I ever had was a pentium 2 with windows 3.1. Looking back on it, it was fine at the time, but I wouldn't want it now.
Seriously, though. Why was Commodore so cool?
It was bare-bones, in a manner of speaking. The units and programming code were extremelly flexible and mod friendly . . . in many underground circles, the C64 was regarded as the ultimate hackers tool due to it's moddability, hardware access and portability.
Otherwise, the hardware end was what earned it's reputation - at the time, it was really the only "PC" where a user could write their own machine level code for control and operation of the hardware systems. As well, trade publications were constantly, constantly publishing tutorials and articles on how to code this, write that program, mod the motherboard, replace this component, etc. etc. The hardware capabilities were respectable on release.
Just for a quick example, here's a short list of the PEEK/POKE commands that allowed a user direct hardware access http://ready64.it/articoli/_files/043_pokesc64.txt [http://ready64.it/articoli/_files/043_pokesc64.txt]. The full list of commands is pretty intense, and you could essentially write and execute programs/code on-the-fly.
Now - I highly doubt this re-incarnation will be that accessible to the general user (some hope with it running Linux), and I highly doubt it'll top the reputation and respect of the original . . . but there's only one way to find out