Company

Recommended Videos

gunner1905

New member
Jun 18, 2010
223
0
0
Damn is ME3 already out? I still haven't finished my hardest difficulty ME2 playthrough (from 2 years ago) yet.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,368
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Caramel Frappe said:
.. Well Erin you and I are in the same boat. Why don't you befriend me on Steam and we'll play a game together?

OT: I know how she feels. Even though I myself have an Xbox 360, I hardly have any friends who own an Xbox 360 or bother playing online. Some who do own one, only use it to watch Netflix rather then wanting me to join their games on MW3 or something. On Steam, no one I have as a friend is into TF2 like how i'm into it. So despite the console or platform I am playing on I am friendless ... :{
Well, that's the thing about online gaming; it's not something you have to do with friends. I rarely play with friends unless it's splitscreen or LAN.

NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Panayjon said:
franksands said:
"What he cares about is that when he puts the disk in his Xbox or PS3, it works. A simple demand that, even with the added robustness of Steam and its ilk, PC gaming often fails to offer."

That's what killed PC gaming for me. I don't want to buy a new computer every 6 months, or a new graphics card that cost the same as a new computer, just to play what I want. When I was buying PC games I would have the hassle of reading the dreaded requirements: does my graphic card supports bumpmapping level 324563 and quadruple anti-alising? It was just horrible.

Today I play happily on my Xbox 360, and buy some casual games on the PC.
You do realize that such hyperbole is just going to infuriate the PC people into frothing bouts of nerd rage right? I'm not saying that you won't want/need to upgrade your PC more often than consoles but those are measured in years and its not like you need to buy a whole new computer each time.

Also, system requirements aren't confusing if you just stop to think about it (though I understand the jargon is intimidating). The only thing which should possibly trip you up is the model of your processor and video card, both of which are easily found by going to your control panel. Example:

Starcraft II
Windows® XP/Windows Vista®/Windows® 7 (Updated with the latest Service Packs) with DirectX® 9.0c
2.6 GHz Pentium® IV or equivalent AMD Athlon® processor
128 MB PCIe NVIDIA® GeForce® 6600 GT or ATI Radeon® 9800 PRO video card or better
12 GB available HD space
1 GB RAM (1.5 GB required for Windows Vista®/Windows® 7 users)
DVD-ROM drive
Broadband Internet connection
1024X720 minimum display resolution
Some people can't afford a gaming PC every year. I got my compy a year ago, upgraded the Processor and Graphics Card, and it still has a seizure if New Vegas is running, or the map gets crowded in Supreme Commander. I haven't been able to run a PC game released this year on the thing, even on the lowest settings.

My PS3 on the other hand, runs everything fine, and has never given me trouble in 2 years.
See, that's where your ignorance shows. A gaming PC, in this day and age, lasts for years before you have to do even the most minor upgrade, and you can keep going for ages without upgrading just by lowering the settings. System requirements haven't been increasing as quickly as you're suggesting since the late 90's.
Not quite seeing where I am spewing ignorance. I bought a mid-range PC for $400 a year ago. I threw in an upgraded processor and graphics card. It ran Oblivion well, Fallout 3 well. any game this year? Nada. 7-8 FPS. Even on lowest.

Or are you saying my experience is not what I experienced?
I'm saying a mid-range PC != a gaming PC. If you had spent $600, instead of $400, we wouldn't be having this discussion. For that matter, $400 isn't exactly "mid range," unless you built it yourself; that's dirt cheap for a modern computer, and way the heck on the low end for something pre-built.

Edit: Also, Oblivion came out in 2005, Fallout 3 came out a year or two after that. Was your PC capable of playing 2011 games in 2011 (assuming that's what you meant by "a year ago")? Because if so, you haven't listed one.
 

octafish

New member
Apr 23, 2010
5,134
0
0
Hmmmmmm, my sister is the only person I know who owns a console. (Three actually, because she bought a PS3 a fortnight ago, before that it was just the Wii and GameCube) That isn't to say most of my friends are PC gamers, there are only a couple of us left, most have gone Mac. That said most of the Macs run XP in Boot Camp so we still get together and LAN games from GOG once in a blue moon. My experience is more and more with randoms these days is all I'm saying, and in Australia, on PC, randoms aren't that bad.
 

Elementary - Dear Watson

RIP Eleuthera, I will miss you
Nov 9, 2010
2,977
0
0
rolfwesselius said:
Zakarath said:
rolfwesselius said:
You should only play pc games if you place experience above comfort.
Why?
pc
1:cramped over your keyboard. (better experience)

Console
2:sitting on a comfortable couch with your controller in your hand's.(better comfort)

The choice depends on how you like your gaming.
Just get a comfy chair for your PC and that issue goes away.
(Plus, I've got my 360 plugged into one of my desktop's monitors, so it's a moot point for me.)
try playing an fps without instinctively bending forward when the action becomes heavy.
Personally, for some inexplicible reason, I stand up when the action mounts! Especially in first person... I find my shoulders sometimes turn too, when I am in combat and trying to turn... I must look like a right tool, but hey, at least im into the game!! :p

OT: Good to see a PC gamer who can appreciate a console gamers way! I don't have the time or expertese to run half of the games, nor can I be bothered to try and get a gaming spec computer, and chose all the parts, and then spend what would be hours of trawling through the internet trying to work out how to install the game properly, eventually giving up and having no fun what so ever... and my xbox holds me at knife point if I so much as think about turning my laptop on in it's vicinity! :S
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Not quite seeing where I am spewing ignorance. I bought a mid-range PC for $400 a year ago. I threw in an upgraded processor and graphics card. It ran Oblivion well, Fallout 3 well. any game this year? Nada. 7-8 FPS. Even on lowest.
"mid-range" for $400?

Excuse me, but if you chose the parts and paid someone to build it, it would be "mid range".

If you paid a brand to throw piss-poor components and expected that a simple upgrade could escape a "bottleneck" then you were wrong. Brands can shove cardboard inside their products and still charge top dollar for it.

If you bought it yourself from scratch, then you chose some kind of component that bottlenecked it. I made the mistake of trusting a cheap PSU brand and it didn't have enough power to let me play BF2. Which isn't exactly the most recent game available.
 

Centrophy

New member
Dec 24, 2009
209
0
0
Erin will also have company with the extra 15 dollars US a month or whatever it is Microsoft charges you for the privilege of using your own internet connection.
 

Owyn_Merrilin

New member
May 22, 2010
7,368
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Owyn_Merrilin said:
Caramel Frappe said:
.. Well Erin you and I are in the same boat. Why don't you befriend me on Steam and we'll play a game together?

OT: I know how she feels. Even though I myself have an Xbox 360, I hardly have any friends who own an Xbox 360 or bother playing online. Some who do own one, only use it to watch Netflix rather then wanting me to join their games on MW3 or something. On Steam, no one I have as a friend is into TF2 like how i'm into it. So despite the console or platform I am playing on I am friendless ... :{
Well, that's the thing about online gaming; it's not something you have to do with friends. I rarely play with friends unless it's splitscreen or LAN.

NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Panayjon said:
franksands said:
"What he cares about is that when he puts the disk in his Xbox or PS3, it works. A simple demand that, even with the added robustness of Steam and its ilk, PC gaming often fails to offer."

That's what killed PC gaming for me. I don't want to buy a new computer every 6 months, or a new graphics card that cost the same as a new computer, just to play what I want. When I was buying PC games I would have the hassle of reading the dreaded requirements: does my graphic card supports bumpmapping level 324563 and quadruple anti-alising? It was just horrible.

Today I play happily on my Xbox 360, and buy some casual games on the PC.
You do realize that such hyperbole is just going to infuriate the PC people into frothing bouts of nerd rage right? I'm not saying that you won't want/need to upgrade your PC more often than consoles but those are measured in years and its not like you need to buy a whole new computer each time.

Also, system requirements aren't confusing if you just stop to think about it (though I understand the jargon is intimidating). The only thing which should possibly trip you up is the model of your processor and video card, both of which are easily found by going to your control panel. Example:

Starcraft II
Windows® XP/Windows Vista®/Windows® 7 (Updated with the latest Service Packs) with DirectX® 9.0c
2.6 GHz Pentium® IV or equivalent AMD Athlon® processor
128 MB PCIe NVIDIA® GeForce® 6600 GT or ATI Radeon® 9800 PRO video card or better
12 GB available HD space
1 GB RAM (1.5 GB required for Windows Vista®/Windows® 7 users)
DVD-ROM drive
Broadband Internet connection
1024X720 minimum display resolution
Some people can't afford a gaming PC every year. I got my compy a year ago, upgraded the Processor and Graphics Card, and it still has a seizure if New Vegas is running, or the map gets crowded in Supreme Commander. I haven't been able to run a PC game released this year on the thing, even on the lowest settings.

My PS3 on the other hand, runs everything fine, and has never given me trouble in 2 years.
See, that's where your ignorance shows. A gaming PC, in this day and age, lasts for years before you have to do even the most minor upgrade, and you can keep going for ages without upgrading just by lowering the settings. System requirements haven't been increasing as quickly as you're suggesting since the late 90's.
Not quite seeing where I am spewing ignorance. I bought a mid-range PC for $400 a year ago. I threw in an upgraded processor and graphics card. It ran Oblivion well, Fallout 3 well. any game this year? Nada. 7-8 FPS. Even on lowest.

Or are you saying my experience is not what I experienced?
I'm saying a mid-range PC != a gaming PC. If you had spent $600, instead of $400, we wouldn't be having this discussion. For that matter, $400 isn't exactly "mid range," unless you built it yourself; that's dirt cheap for a modern computer, and way the heck on the low end for something pre-built.

Edit: Also, Oblivion came out in 2005, Fallout 3 came out a year or two after that. Was your PC capable of playing 2011 games in 2011 (assuming that's what you meant by "a year ago")? Because if so, you haven't listed one.
The point still stands that for the same price as my computer (400 + 80 (GC) + 125 (Processor) I bought a PS3 ($280) and 8 games.

You may get somewhat better graphics on the PC, but it is a helluva lot more expensive.
Unless you need a computer for things like word processing and internet browsing anyway, in which case the PC costs an extra $200 for high quality gaming, while the PS3 runs anywhere from $250-$600 depending on when in its lifecycle you buy/bought it. You might have had a case last gen, where the PS2 eventually dropped to $50-$100 at the end of its life cycle, but it's just not accurate anymore.
 

truestatic

New member
Apr 2, 2010
1
0
0
Welp, you're more than welcome to play with me and my group of bros. I can understand feeling excluded from a circle like this, but as a PC gamer, over my time in various communities for various games, I have made a bunch of very good online friends who I have a great time with and play with frequently. Since the death of the split screen experience, I don't think there's a lot of difference between making connections with like minded gamers online, and playing with your RL pals, each in your own living room. Spread your wings. Find good people, internationally if necessary. We exist, and we're great company.

Cheers!
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
trollpwner said:
lacktheknack said:
The Gentleman said:
It may be inferior hardware, but it is much more fun to play on my 103" mega-fallus television.
Hook up your computer to your TV with a gamepad.

(world explodes)
(Turns out it's an 11-year-old crappy P.C. and the images it projects across the screen for the 0.6 seconds before the GPU melts are fugly)
(If you have a crappy 11 year old computer and a 103" mega-phallus TV, you're doing it wrong)
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
I hate K+M, and I'm not a graphics whore. People can preach to me the powerful tools of a proper graphics card or an interface I hate for gaming, but I don't care. It's not even about my couch.

Never really got the problem, anyway: You can buy and play with friends, or stick to your moral high ground and game alone, aloof and superior. Or you can spend twice as much to try and split the difference. Something for everyone.
 

darksakul

Old Man? I am not that old .....
Jun 14, 2008
629
0
0
I want to point out Mass Effect 3 is going to have a PS3 release
 

Jbowdown

New member
Feb 19, 2011
19
0
0
NameIsRobertPaulson said:
Not quite seeing where I am spewing ignorance. I bought a mid-range PC for $400 a year ago. I threw in an upgraded processor and graphics card. It ran Oblivion well, Fallout 3 well. any game this year? Nada. 7-8 FPS. Even on lowest.

Or are you saying my experience is not what I experienced?

The point still stands that for the same price as my computer (400 + 80 (GC) + 125 (Processor) I bought a PS3 ($280) and 8 games.

You may get somewhat better graphics on the PC, but it is a helluva lot more expensive.
I'm now actually quite interested in the hardware you had in your pre-built system and what you 'upgraded' it with. An $80 GPU and a $125 CPU is still on the low-end of the spectrum in each of the respective hardware categories. It seems to me that you upgraded your low-end system with just more low-end parts. Also, free advice for everyone reading this, don't ever buy a pre-built PC unless you know for a fact that it has a clean or OEM version of Windows 7 64-bit on it. Powerspec and Sager are good examples of a companies that uses clean installations on their retail computers. Much of the bottleneck on name-brand computers will come from the 20-30 extra background processes and programs these companies install on the system combined with all the limitations a 32-bit OS now has for gaming.

My system has cost me around 1,100 dollars last year after a few upgrades to the $800 base model I bought and I'd consider that a mid-range gaming computer. Even my 'mid-range' computer plays every game I throw at it on ultra-high settings with at least 4x AA on without a hit on FPS (this includes New Vegas, Skyrim high-res pack, Crysis and Deus Ex: HR to name a few). But of course I don't just game on it as I also use it as a media server, for web-browsing, business, and Video/Audio Editing (of which the first editing job paid for the cost of the original unit). Computers are like cars, spend a little more on quality components and you'll more than make up the cost in the added longevity of the product.
 

Redlin5_v1legacy

Better Red than Dead
Aug 5, 2009
48,834
0
0
TimeLord said:
I prefer the feel of a nice controller in my hands over an awkward keyboard and mouse where I have a million button maps to remember.

Yes I know I can get a 360 controller for the PC. I still don't care though. Also my computer is crap, I quite happy to not spend £500+ for a new one to then buy a £40 game to go with it. I'll just use my perfectly functional 360.
I'm quite the opposite. The 360 controller is uncomfortable for me and I just know the Gamecube controller has seen the last of it's usability for me. I don't even own a Wii. Keyboard and precision mouse control FTW!

Also I like my shiny tray. I'm using it right now!


My thoughts on tablets can be explained elsewhere.
 

Kermi

Elite Member
Nov 7, 2007
2,538
0
41
ElPatron said:
Kermi said:
I love how since 2007 people have been ripping on 360 gamers for their inferior gaming experience, but at the 11th hour a bunch of people are (threatening/claiming they are) boycotting ME3 because of Origin.

Man I'm lucky I stuck with my shitty console version and don't have to worry about Origin or being blocked from playing because of faulty DRM or any shit like that.

Enjoy your not playing, Origin boycotters.
Their choice.

One way of looking at this: I loathe Bioware games altogether (no, not even Neverwinter Nights - come at me, Biodrones) so trough my point of view, you're actually the one making a mistake. Ahah, enjoy your subpar game full of clichés.

So, what you said is, like, your opinion, man. If they refuse to play the game, or prefer to enjoy their gaming session trough the power of uTorrent, it's their choice. Many will probably visit a private sales website and buy it used, or just shamelessly pirate it.

Another way to look at this: If I don't want my PC games to have Origin or DRM, why should I give money to them by buying a console version anyway?

Either way, nobody is wrong, nor right. It's a matter of opinions, and I sure did not like the sound of your "holier-than-thou" attitude.

I might not like Bioware games, but at least I respect their choice. They like Bioware games, but don't want the "compromise" that DRM is.

Disclaimer: I own an xbox 360 and a PSP and I have nothing against consoles apart from the fact that we get shitty ports and even today's "core games" like CoD and Gears of War are pretty causal
Way to make a completely irrelevant post. I was referring to people who enjoyed ME1 and 2 but are opting to boycott ME3 for some bullshit unrelated to the game. Meanwhile, I'll continue to enjoy a game series I happen to enjoy.

You're free to not like the games and I never said otherwise.
 

Hiroshi Mishima

New member
Sep 25, 2008
407
0
0
Gods, I wanted to just hug Erin with how miserable she looked in the last panel. :<

As for PC vs Console.. I spent many years as a console gamer and I still prefer it for a lot of reasons. However, I do not like doing multiplayer on consoles because of split-screen hurting my eyes (and the resolution hasn't helped). Unfortunately, my computer isn't the most up-to-date piece of hardware there is and I wouldn't even be able to conceive of running ME3, Skyrim, or even Portal 2. In those situations I often have to either give it us (as with Skyrim), or play it on my Xbox (as with Portal 2).

Also, as has been said a few times, I refuse to pay extra money to play console games with other people. I also hate having to pay 3 times more for a game on XBL than I do on Steam, but if it won't run on my computer.. I'm at an impasse.

EDIT: Someone said "what about when you hunch over while playing an FPS as the action gets heavy?" And I thought, why the hell DO people do that? The only thing I can think of is that as it gets more intense they have to lean in closer to get a better look at the screen since everything is often so many shades of grey and brown or dimly lit corridors. With a PC, the screen is naturally much closer.

In my case, I lean in while playing console games these days anyway cause my eyesight isn't as good as it used to be (damage by Diabetes Type 2), and as said, a lot of these modern games have graphics where it's hard to make out anything. I can hardly see the enemies in stuff like Gears of War half the time.
 

The Lunatic

Princess
Jun 3, 2010
2,291
0
0
PC vs Console?

Really? That's still a debate?

There is -nothing- absolutely nothing a console can do that a PC cannot.

Installing games?

That'll take you at most 3-4 minutes these days with up to date hardware. (Which is nothing compared to the length of time it takes to install games on the consoles, I might add.)

There's a big difference between "I can't figure out how to do that" and "It can't do that".
 

ElPatron

New member
Jul 18, 2011
2,130
0
0
Kermi said:
Way to make a completely irrelevant post. I was referring to people who enjoyed ME1 and 2 but are opting to boycott ME3 for some bullshit unrelated to the game. Meanwhile, I'll continue to enjoy a game series I happen to enjoy.

You're free to not like the games and I never said otherwise.
It was not irrelevant. I'll explain it again.

You can to love a game to death and still not "buy" it (ie: by not buying new or just pirating it).

Now seriously, what is wrong with me loving, say, Ninjustu but not be willing to pay for overpriced classes because there are no cheaper dojos around? I might like it a lot. And still refuse to go. Therefore I won't reach that belt I wanted and my progress will end halfway.

People feel good about sticking to their principles. I guess that the majority of the players who are really going to boycott it actually feel good about it. And probably it feels better than actually playing the game. I don't know, I could not name any game that made me feel better than "real life accomplishment" (although a few are pretty close). That would be just wrong.

So they probably will feel more satisfaction than you. Specially those who pirate/buy a used copy. They will feel good twice.


The Lunatic said:
There's a big difference between "I can't figure out how to do that" and "It can't do that".
Just confront someone saying that.

They will usually admit they are just too stupid to figure out how to google or just call you a "nerd".

Hilarity ensures.
 

Anthony Wells

New member
May 28, 2011
363
0
0
I would love to be a pc gamer only...absolutely love it...but i make 10 dollars a week currently....i cant ever get a gaming pc at that rate...once i get a job i could..but i dont want to throw my first 5 paychecks away to upgrade my gaming computer... on the other hand i already have a ps3...so all i need to do is buy the game i want to play...
The Lunatic said:
PC vs Console?

Really? That's still a debate?

There is -nothing- absolutely nothing a console can do that a PC cannot.

Installing games?

That'll take you at most 3-4 minutes these days with up to date hardware. (Which is nothing compared to the length of time it takes to install games on the consoles, I might add.)

There's a big difference between "I can't figure out how to do that" and "It can't do that".

looking at my post the only thing a pc cant do is cost under 300 dollars and run brand new games great. but thats a moot point since most people have jobs that can afford it.
 

Arina Love

GOT MOE?
Apr 8, 2010
1,061
0
0
The Lunatic said:
PC vs Console?

Really? That's still a debate?

There is -nothing- absolutely nothing a console can do that a PC cannot.

Installing games?

That'll take you at most 3-4 minutes these days with up to date hardware. (Which is nothing compared to the length of time it takes to install games on the consoles, I might add.)

There's a big difference between "I can't figure out how to do that" and "It can't do that".
how about 7gen J-RPGs haven't seen many on PC :D it's pretty big factor for some people, like me. So yeah PC cannot do j-rpgs that's why i'm not PC player, consoles have pretty much all AAA games PC have AND have j-RPGs + console exclusive games (halo,uncharted,gears and many others) .
For PS2 emulation you have to have console bios so you have to own console OR be a pirate.