You know "damn well" that you're stretching the definitions for an artificial distinction. Glass houses and stones, dear.Legion said:You know damn well that by "domestic" I wasn't referring to the legal definition, but the social one.
You know "damn well" that you're stretching the definitions for an artificial distinction. Glass houses and stones, dear.Legion said:You know damn well that by "domestic" I wasn't referring to the legal definition, but the social one.
Why is beating a woman suddenly more 'scary' than beating a man?TekMoney said:It's a pretty scary sort of person that advocates for beating a woman, then tries to defend it. Logically nobody should have been beaten, and anyone who makes statements like that is going to get the side-eye from me. A flash of anger is no excuse for violence, domestic or otherwise.Kaulen Fuhs said:And I know Abomination well enough to know that what he meant was logically he should hit the girl. He just phrased it poorly.
Oh, you're one of those people who thinks misandry is a thing. Oh dear, I'm sorry.Abomination said:Why is beating a woman suddenly more 'scary' than beating a man?TekMoney said:It's a pretty scary sort of person that advocates for beating a woman, then tries to defend it. Logically nobody should have been beaten, and anyone who makes statements like that is going to get the side-eye from me. A flash of anger is no excuse for violence, domestic or otherwise.Kaulen Fuhs said:And I know Abomination well enough to know that what he meant was logically he should hit the girl. He just phrased it poorly.
They should be equally scary. Are you some kind of misandrist?
I don't care about the genders involved. I just dislike seeing someone being physically assaulted for doing NO wrong at all yet the one who did the wrong is somehow even more protected because they're female.
As a feminist: misandry is a thing, pretending it isn't just makes you look like a pretentious asshole constantly trying to belittle the opposition. Like it or not, the decentralized nature of the feminist movement does lead to the inclusion of psychopaths and idiots. Remember that news story about a woman who had a man locked up in her home for ages, raped and abused him constantly, and a bunch of morally and mentally bankrupt 'feminists' praised her as some kind of hero? Or how about yet another story of a man getting his genitals mutilated being met with a choir of cackles or victim-blaming?TekMoney said:Oh, you're one of those people who thinks misandry is a thing. Oh dear, I'm sorry.Abomination said:Why is beating a woman suddenly more 'scary' than beating a man?TekMoney said:It's a pretty scary sort of person that advocates for beating a woman, then tries to defend it. Logically nobody should have been beaten, and anyone who makes statements like that is going to get the side-eye from me. A flash of anger is no excuse for violence, domestic or otherwise.Kaulen Fuhs said:And I know Abomination well enough to know that what he meant was logically he should hit the girl. He just phrased it poorly.
They should be equally scary. Are you some kind of misandrist?
I don't care about the genders involved. I just dislike seeing someone being physically assaulted for doing NO wrong at all yet the one who did the wrong is somehow even more protected because they're female.
You'll remember, I did say he shouldn't assault anyone. But you said that he should just beat his girlfriend. That is you calling for a man beating a woman. You are advocating in favour of violence against women.