Competitive Gamer Arrested For Hitting Ex-Girlfriend

Recommended Videos

Aramis Night

New member
Mar 31, 2013
535
0
0
Lonewolfm16 said:
Seriously the whole focus on "violence against women" bothers me. He may or may not have hit the ex-girlfriend, but he definitely hit the guy. So why does the ex get mentioned? Oh yes, because a fight between men is not important, but if a girl gets hurt we make it a big deal. *Sigh* oh well...
The answer is money. Just like it always is. Violence against women is big business. Corporate sponsors love stories about that as do governments. Advertisers know that people are automatically more susceptible to feelings of outrage and sympathy over any negative thing that happens to women. It attracts more page views and traffic for sites to sensationalize any such negative things done to women which of course leads to blatant exaggerations.

The whole abuse industry loves these stories as its yet another shining example of the need for more funding from both government and private agencies/individuals which helps keep there coffers filled and keeps public sentiment of there job positive so that there business practices are rarely ever looked upon critically(not to imply that abuse shelters are typically corrupt, but there have a been a few cases of corruption/abuse within that have surfaced here and there).

And of course governments love these stories as it gives them more justification for passing increasingly draconian legislation which increases government control in people's lives while doing little to actually hinder the problem they were implemented to solve(i.e. VAWA). Plus politicians can attach pretty much any rider they want for whatever money wasting pet project they want with domestic violence legislation it will still be likely to pass.
 

Flaery

Ghetto Trash
Dec 23, 2012
116
0
0
Why did he walk into the room? Was it his room, the competitor's room, or his Ex's room? I can't say I wouldn't fly off the handle if placed in a similar situation, assuming all information is accurate (i.e. believing the girl was still my girlfriend)
 

Thyunda

New member
May 4, 2009
2,955
0
0
Flaery said:
Why did he walk into the room? Was it his room, the competitor's room, or his Ex's room? I can't say I wouldn't fly off the handle if placed in a similar situation, assuming all information is accurate (i.e. believing the girl was still my girlfriend)
The implication is that it was a hotel room, and hotel rooms cannot be opened from the outside without a key. Evidently he had a key, so it was either his suite, or he was sharing the suite with the 'ex-girlfriend'. Or the other tournament player, but since the article insists on calling him another player and not a friend, I'm going to have to assume that he shared the suite with the 'ex-girlfriend'. I use the apostrophes like that because a lot of focus seems to be on the fact that they weren't together, but nothing else really supports that.

OT - Yeah. How is this news? This isn't a case of a competitive gamer being a dick, this is a regular guy who just walked in on something that would make 99% of men and women totally fly off the handle. I'd probably have reacted the way he did. And I'm a pacifist. There's a reason exemptions are made in court over this sort of thing - very rarely is anybody actually punished for assaulting a cheating partner's lover, unless they accidentally kill them or cause GBH.

It concerns me that there's a fair few posts in this thread against him. Whether or not you agree with violence or the situation, you can't possibly be so lacking in empathy that you can't understand why he reacted as he did. He doesn't need anger management or mental therapy, he's not ill or irrationally angry. This reads like an attempt at slander, and that's never a good thing.
 

AuronFtw

New member
Nov 29, 2010
514
0
0
JarinArenos said:
Seriously though, people like this guy need court-mandated mental treatment.
For hitting a guy tapping your girlfriend? Sounds par for the course. Fucker should have known better. Hitting the girlfriend is of course unacceptable, but it doesn't sound like he actually "hit" her, she just tried to jump between two fighting males, which also isn't a terribly smart move. Mandating mental treatment for hitting the guy banging your girl is overkill. If you kill him, sure. Or even if you hit him with a car. But hitting him with your fists, the moment when you catch them together? No, that's not abnormal. Certainly nothing that requires *mandatory* mental treatment.

This is only "news" because the girl is making a stink about getting hit herself. And who knows if it's even true, Kotaku isn't exactly known for journalistic integrity. Aside from that, guys beating each other up over girls is nothing new.
 

TekMoney

New member
Jun 30, 2013
92
0
0
Abomination said:
The only justified bit of violence in this is the fact he supposedly hit her.

Striking a man for having sex with your girlfriend is unacceptable - he was not the one who was obligated to you in any way. All the violence should have been directed at his girlfriend.
That's a new low for the Escapist. Here we actually have someone advocating for domestic abuse.
 

McKinsey

New member
Nov 14, 2011
50
0
0
The7Sins said:
Thieves, rapists, pedophiles, cheaters, and Republicans (joking on this) all need to be shot for the betterment of the world. Some actions should disqualify one from life due to the abhorrent actions. Theft, sex crimes, cheating on someone are such actions that should be punished to the fullest extent.
Dude, seriously, stop with the murder talk. I think the guy was perfectly in his right to get angry and throw a couple punches, and a cheater deserves a smack in the face, but that's really all the punishment they should get. You can't go around killing people "for the betterment of the world". Sounds a bit Nazi to me.

Thyunda said:
It concerns me that there's a fair few posts in this thread against him. Whether or not you agree with violence or the situation, you can't possibly be so lacking in empathy that you can't understand why he reacted as he did. He doesn't need anger management or mental therapy, he's not ill or irrationally angry. This reads like an attempt at slander, and that's never a good thing.
I agree. You'd think some people here can't understand that betrayal is one of the worst things that could happen to a loving person.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
TekMoney said:
Abomination said:
The only justified bit of violence in this is the fact he supposedly hit her.

Striking a man for having sex with your girlfriend is unacceptable - he was not the one who was obligated to you in any way. All the violence should have been directed at his girlfriend.
That's a new low for the Escapist. Here we actually have someone advocating for domestic abuse.
Yeah, because attacking a third party is always -so- much better, right?

Realize you got more upset at the idea of him hitting a woman than hitting a male. Gender equality!
 

irok

New member
Jun 6, 2012
118
0
0
Did she not block? well, maybe she did and he broke it, fighting gamers.
Still, interesting how this might be considered news all we need is a few scandals and some SC2 players on cereal and gaming could be just like real sports.
 

mad825

New member
Mar 28, 2010
3,379
0
0
So she got hit because she got in the way? So like domestic abuse -__- serves her right for doing something so stupid.
 

TekMoney

New member
Jun 30, 2013
92
0
0
Abomination said:
TekMoney said:
Abomination said:
The only justified bit of violence in this is the fact he supposedly hit her.

Striking a man for having sex with your girlfriend is unacceptable - he was not the one who was obligated to you in any way. All the violence should have been directed at his girlfriend.
That's a new low for the Escapist. Here we actually have someone advocating for domestic abuse.
Yeah, because attacking a third party is always -so- much better, right?

Realize you got more upset at the idea of him hitting a woman than hitting a male. Gender equality!
Or you could not beat anyone? That's always a good call.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
TekMoney said:
Or you could not beat anyone? That's always a good call.
Of course, he shouldn't have hit anyone. But the person in that situation who should have had the least ire directed at them received the most physical trauma.
 

TekMoney

New member
Jun 30, 2013
92
0
0
Abomination said:
TekMoney said:
Or you could not beat anyone? That's always a good call.
Of course, he shouldn't have hit anyone. But the person in that situation who should have had the least ire directed at them received the most physical trauma.
No, you're not going to convince me that now you're not in favour of violence. What you said was "All the violence should have been directed at his girlfriend." So clearly you think he should have beat his girlfriend. And that's advocating for domestic violence.
 

Abomination

New member
Dec 17, 2012
2,939
0
0
TekMoney said:
Abomination said:
TekMoney said:
Or you could not beat anyone? That's always a good call.
Of course, he shouldn't have hit anyone. But the person in that situation who should have had the least ire directed at them received the most physical trauma.
No, you're not going to convince me that now you're not in favour of violence. What you said was "All the violence should have been directed at his girlfriend." So clearly you think he should have beat his girlfriend. And that's advocating for domestic violence.
I am not in favour of violence. I think I would know what I am or am not in favour of.

That being said, I am just highlighting how the person who did receive the violence was the least deserving party of any ire in the scenario. So if he was going to hit someone he'd better hit the person who actually wronged him.
 

AuronFtw

New member
Nov 29, 2010
514
0
0
TekMoney said:
No, you're not going to convince me that now you're not in favour of violence. What you said was "All the violence should have been directed at his girlfriend." So clearly you think he should have beat his girlfriend. And that's advocating for domestic violence.
He probably meant it was her fault, and so any consequences/fallout should be directed at her. Violence is definitely the wrong word to use, but it's kind of her "job" as a person in a relationship to respect that relationship, and her violation of it is the cause of much anger.

I don't get the feeling that he's seriously advocating domestic abuse, merely that it's her "fault" for banging the guy and anything negative that happens to her is pretty much deserved. Which I don't necessarily agree with, mind you, but that seems much more likely than "the guy should have *only* beat up his girlfriend!"
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,305
0
0
Abandon4093 said:
So a guy punches another guy for making with the bumpy bum time with his girlfriend.... and it becomes international news?

You know, I should be more surprised by that...
So should I.

I love how the article title is streeeeeeeetching sooooooo haaaaaaaaaaard to make the article feel relevant to us in any way. Maybe they should just admit a slow news day.
 

TekMoney

New member
Jun 30, 2013
92
0
0
Abomination said:
I am not in favour of violence. I think I would know what I am or am not in favour of.
Again, you said he should have hit his girlfriend. That is being in favour of violence. If you say someone should be beaten, it means you want them to be beaten.
 

McKinsey

New member
Nov 14, 2011
50
0
0
Blitzwing said:
It?s the law. It doesn?t matter if he was angry that doesn?t give him the right to commit assault.
Nobody cares about the law when something like this happens in your life. He didn't kill or maim anyone. He didn't plan this attack in advance. He reacted like any normal human being would in a situation like this, and there wouldn't even be anything to discuss here had he not accidentally hit his girlfriend in the heat of the fight.
 

TekMoney

New member
Jun 30, 2013
92
0
0
Kaulen Fuhs said:
TekMoney said:
Abomination said:
I am not in favour of violence. I think I would know what I am or am not in favour of.
Again, you said he should have hit his girlfriend. That is being in favour of violence. If you say someone should be beaten, it means you want them to be beaten.
If he was going to hit anyone, he should have hit the girl. Just logically, like, she's the one who broke the trust. But yes, no one should have been assaulted.
As I've had to say a whole bunch of times now, what he said was "All the violence should have been directed as his girlfriend"
 

TekMoney

New member
Jun 30, 2013
92
0
0
Kaulen Fuhs said:
And I know Abomination well enough to know that what he meant was logically he should hit the girl. He just phrased it poorly.
It's a pretty scary sort of person that advocates for beating a woman, then tries to defend it. Logically nobody should have been beaten, and anyone who makes statements like that is going to get the side-eye from me. A flash of anger is no excuse for violence, domestic or otherwise.
 

Something Amyss

Aswyng and Amyss
Dec 3, 2008
24,756
0
0
Legion said:
You know damn well that by "domestic" I wasn't referring to the legal definition, but the social one.
You know "damn well" that you're stretching the definitions for an artificial distinction. Glass houses and stones, dear.