Except it hasn't been. Putting those labels on games would be false advertising.Andy Chalk said:"WARNING: Excessive exposure to violent videogames and other violent media has been linked to aggressive behavior."
Except it hasn't been. Putting those labels on games would be false advertising.Andy Chalk said:"WARNING: Excessive exposure to violent videogames and other violent media has been linked to aggressive behavior."
The arguement in the supreme court case, beacuse the Justices had the same question you just asked and literaly asked why violent movies shouldn't be held to the same regulation. The arguement was that the INTERACTIVE component to video games give it more "teaches you to be evil" edge.ph0b0s123 said:No problems with this, as long as it also done for movies.....
I also love that violence warrants health warnings, but nothing about needing to take breaks during long gaming sessions, make sure you get some exercise, etc, you know actual health advise for gamers. Typical.
Fixed.Senator Joe Baca said:"WARNING: Excessive unemployment rates of 12% or higher, in my represented state of California, have been proven to cause aggressive behavior and violence in the general population. Though I don't plan on looking into that, because I'm an old useless fuck, and instead, I would like to spend a lot of money adding labels to things."
BlindTom said:What links?
While I agree (like every damn person on this website -- I'm still waiting for these stories to stop generating pages of comments all saying the same thing) that there is little enough evidence that video games are dangerous that society should at least direct it's attention elsewhere, I'd like to point out that the quote above is a tired, useless argument. For all the crying "correlation =/= causation" (which is true), I hear this an awful lot. The statement is meaningless, if ironic considering the esteemed congressman's testimony. Put simply, asserting that there is a causal relationship here is to invoke post hoc. (On second thought, that wasn't so simple.) Furthermore, even saying "if video games did cause violence, we would see a proportional increase in violent crime as the industry grows" is completely false. The variables that determine crime rate are too many to count, and any number of them could be effecting this drop. For all we know from this statement, video games could still be a problem.Andy Chalk said:....or that violent crime in the U.S. has actually declined over the past two decades despite the explosive growth of the videogame industry.
...That's because there is no such link to inform people of in the first place, you dolt. By the way, you didn't dodge your responsibility to inform people of the link between you recycling the same bullshit bill and wasting taxpayer time and money, right?But not if you're Joe Baca, a California Congressman who thinks the game industry is dodging its responsibility to inform people of the link between violent media and violent behavior.
1: they already do that. it's called the ESRB rating system. whether or not a t-rated game is purchased is up to the parents (who must be brain dead, because they're not paying attention to what their children are doing)."The videogame industry has a responsibility to parents, families, and to consumers - to inform them of the potentially damaging content that is often found in their products."
Despite the fact that there is absolutely no conclusive evidence to suggest that any such link exists.Andy Chalk said:California Congressman Joe Baca has introduced "The Video Game Health Labeling Act of 2011," a bill that would require all games rated T or higher to carry another label warning about the links between violent media and aggressive behavior.
Would someone kindly remind this brain-damaged son of a ***** that that is EXACTLY what the E-AO rating system already does?Andy Chalk said:"The videogame industry has a responsibility to parents, families, and to consumers - to inform them of the potentially damaging content that is often found in their products," said Rep. Baca.
via: GamePolitics [http://gamepolitics.com/2011/01/25/congressman-joe-baca-pushes-warning-labels-games]
Permalink
Evidence: "It's all in my head! So it MUST be right! RARGH!"Thus this legislation, which would mandate that all games rated T (Teen) or higher carry a label reading "WARNING: Excessive exposure to violent videogames and other violent media has been linked to aggressive behavior."
PFHAHAHAHAHA!"The music industry has a responsibility to parents, families, and to consumers - to inform them of the potentially damaging content that is often found in their lyrics," said Rep. Baca. "They have repeatedly failed to live up to this responsibility. Meanwhile research continues to show a proven link between listening to mature music and increased aggression and Satanism in young people. American families deserve to know the truth about these potentially dangerous lyrics."