You do realize that Democrat Dianne Feinstein has said similar things on this matter? This is a common political escape-goat for BOTH parties.Korastus said:Just another right wing lunatic desperate to use the deaths of innocents to champion a personal cause. Facts, evidence, basic logic, these things mean nothing to this sort of person. Not surprising.
Under Stand Your Ground, the antagonist could have just said he felt threatened and shot Meat Boy long ago and gotten away with it. The game was solved years before it would have taken place!Zachary Amaranth said:Ironically, if Meat Boy had had a gun, he could have used Castle Doctrine and/or Stand Your Ground to defend his girlfriend and there would be no game.MCerberus said:Every .12 seconds a (super) Meat Boy is impaled upon spikes. Won't you do your part to stop the violence?
Guns-1
Games-0.
And he wouldn't even need to prove it, because he's a fetus and therefore untouchable. Mwahahahahaha!MCerberus said:Under Stand Your Ground, the antagonist could have just said he felt threatened and shot Meat Boy long ago and gotten away with it. The game was solved years before it would have taken place!
Guns-2
Games-0
Were getting to the point where today's parent is yesterday's gamer. And possibly still a gamer, since the median age is somewhere around mine.Callate said:I'm beginning to wish we could just have a form response: Chill out (Mom/Dad), you grew up during (the height of drug culture/the rock-and-roll is corrupting our youth phase/the heyday of exploitation cinema/the heyday of slasher cinema/(fill in the blank)), and you managed not to kill anyone; can you recognize that today's youth isn't any more susceptible to that wacky, dangerous beast that is modern pop culture than you were?
It's also weird that it's mostly from the party that spent almost a decade getting their way by ending every sentence with or the terrorists win."Saltyk said:Living in fear of another Sandy Hook or Columbine is exactly what gives these people power.
Why, does it being suicide undo the death or something? Those statistics are not inaccurate or misleading unless they added context you removed. In which case you're being misleading yourself to try and lead into "it's probably more" and "I've heard it was a million."Mind you, this is from an antigun group who I already showed was misleading you on the deaths.
You're misrepresenting the reason she wants a warning label. She wants something like a cigarette pack warning, which games do not have.Reincarnatedwolfgod said:There are already warning labels.
these labels are from the ESRB and M is one of their already existing warning labels. This law is a redundant and a waste of time.
One day people will stop trying to make video games their scapegoat but toady sure as hell is not that day.
If you outlaw games, only outlaws will have games.Racecarlock said:Hey lady!
Games don't kill people, people kill people.
The only way to stop a bad guy with a game is a good guy with a game.
We should get rid of game free zones because criminals and bad guys don't care where they use their games.
Do I make sense yet?
I don't know what the console part of this has to do with anything. If you're a gamer, this law will impact you (provided you are playing "mature" titles). Hell, more and more download services charge applicable taxes.Mezahmay said:*bangs head against desk a few times before giving up* Why does my home state suck so much?! Please, Connecticut, don't ruin M-rated games. I may not be a console gamer anymore, but it's the principle of the matter.
My point was that as far as I know a single state cannot impose a tax through digital distribution services. If the service wants to charge extra, then by all means they're allowed to regardless of how consumers feel about it. I may be wrong. I really hope I'm not wrong. Even though consoles are beginning to distribute their games digitally I'd imagine they're still sold primarily through retail stores, which the state can absolutely place taxes on. I haven't purchased a physical game since I started PC gaming, so I don't consider the tax an issue for me personally.Zachary Amaranth said:I don't know what the console part of this has to do with anything. If you're a gamer, this law will impact you (provided you are playing "mature" titles). Hell, more and more download services charge applicable taxes.
The ESRB doesn't say games lead to antisocial behaviour and/or baby killing or whatever she's claiming the results are.Glaice said:Well Miss Hovey, there is something called PARENTING to keep such games out of reach of those who shouldn't be playing them, and what is wrong with the ESRB ratings?