Cop Blames Videogames For Sandy Hook Massacre

Stevepinto3

New member
Jun 4, 2009
585
0
0
"These guns, one of them an AR-15, in the hands of a violent, insane gamer. It was like porn to a rapist,"

Nominated for Dumbest Analogy of the Year. I can't even begin to draw parallels here. This is what happens when you talk faster than your brain can process what you're saying.
 

Cid Silverwing

Paladin of The Light
Jul 27, 2008
3,134
0
0
Yet another grossly uninformed fuckwit who has no idea what he's talking about.

Either that or he's a troll. Either way, move along. Nothing new here.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
gamers are the only ones that ever count score right? oh wait, no, sports do to. so ban sports, its obviously their fault.

Ne1butme said:
Also, i couldn't enable the auto-aim.
You filthy console peasant, bend to your PC master who happens to have this magical device called "mouse" and needs no stupid autoaim.
 

Hellfireboy

New member
Mar 11, 2013
48
0
0
Strazdas said:
gamers are the only ones that ever count score right? oh wait, no, sports do to. so ban sports, its obviously their fault.

Ne1butme said:
Also, i couldn't enable the auto-aim.
You filthy console peasant, bend to your PC master who happens to have this magical device called "mouse" and needs no stupid autoaim.
I spent 10 years in the Army, fired all kinds of weapons including the M4/M16, the M2 heavy machine gun, M249 SAW and the M203 grenade launcher. I loved shooting. You know what doesn't feel anything like shooting a firearm? Clicking a fucking mouse! In addition a tactical reload is a little more complicated than pressing a button in real life. If Call of Duty can make you into a goddamn super-soldier they why isn't Madden producing more top football players?
 

Slash2x

New member
Dec 7, 2009
503
0
0
PoolCleaningRobot said:
I'm willing to bet this interview was bullshit just trying to stir up page views
*Reads over all the reviews, re-posts and comments associated with this "journalism" *

YUP. Must be a slow "news" day
 

xpacerx

New member
Feb 25, 2009
44
0
0
Man, I been playing video games for 25 years and I seem to never remember to switch to my handgun after I run out of ammo in my assault rifle. I also never remember any FPS I have ever played that prepared me for the actual kick, sound and reloading of real firearms. The kid would have to have had real training on the actual weapons he used in order to be as effective tactically as he was. It amazes me that professionals would think a video game could prepare someone for this. Anything you could scrounge from a video game to be considered "training" could also or even more so come from an action movie or youtube tutorials where you would see real people performing these actions.
 

Strazdas

Robots will replace your job
May 28, 2011
8,407
0
0
Hellfireboy said:
Strazdas said:
gamers are the only ones that ever count score right? oh wait, no, sports do to. so ban sports, its obviously their fault.

Ne1butme said:
Also, i couldn't enable the auto-aim.
You filthy console peasant, bend to your PC master who happens to have this magical device called "mouse" and needs no stupid autoaim.
I spent 10 years in the Army, fired all kinds of weapons including the M4/M16, the M2 heavy machine gun, M249 SAW and the M203 grenade launcher. I loved shooting. You know what doesn't feel anything like shooting a firearm? Clicking a fucking mouse! In addition a tactical reload is a little more complicated than pressing a button in real life. If Call of Duty can make you into a goddamn super-soldier they why isn't Madden producing more top football players?
it was a joke jab at his console autoaim since consoles cant aim properly.....
 

HellbirdIV

New member
May 21, 2009
608
0
0
Remus said:
Anonymous sources for tabloids DO NOT EXIST.
Oh I'm sure they do. I imagine tabloid journalists are too lazy and creatively bankrupt to make it all up themselves, so they ask a random person to make something up, then they say the source is totes a legit authority on the subject, if only so they'll get writer's credit.

It takes two to do the tabloid tango.
 

SSJBlastoise

New member
Dec 20, 2012
500
0
0
rhizhim said:


slowest accuser of violence due violent video games of all time!
OF ALL TIME!
I honestly thought it was a necro but then I looked at the date and thought WTF? Anyway, must have been a slow news day or something, I can't see why this kind of statement is just coming out now.

Andy Chalk said:
The officer said Lanza learned some of the techniques he used in his attack from videogames, including the "tactical reload" - reloading before your current clip empties - and switching to a handgun when the strap broke on his AR-15 rifle. "Classic police training," he said. "Or something you learn playing kill games."
I find this the worst part of it, that kind of stuff isn't hard to look up on the internet and doesn't really require much thought to think "shit, I'm close to no ammo and there's not much going on, better reload". If he was a true gamer there would be magazines scattered around that only had half a dozen shots fired.
 

AT God

New member
Dec 24, 2008
564
0
0
I haven't played consoles in a long time, which button reloads the guns? On the most pistols I think you have to press A, if thats the button on the controller also we may have an epidemic brewing around here.
 

BoogieManFL

New member
Apr 14, 2008
1,284
0
0
Wow, I must be lucky. My strap on my AR never broke while I was playing a video game.

Okay but seriously, why does it matter he played video games when it's known he had mental illness? Really? Explain that one.

People who go on mass killings are messed up in the head, plain and simple. Hundreds of millions of people play video games every day. Yet, shootings like this are relatively rare. And these kinds of murder sprees happened centuries ago.


 

Hellfireboy

New member
Mar 11, 2013
48
0
0
Strazdas said:
Hellfireboy said:
Strazdas said:
gamers are the only ones that ever count score right? oh wait, no, sports do to. so ban sports, its obviously their fault.

Ne1butme said:
Also, i couldn't enable the auto-aim.
You filthy console peasant, bend to your PC master who happens to have this magical device called "mouse" and needs no stupid autoaim.
I spent 10 years in the Army, fired all kinds of weapons including the M4/M16, the M2 heavy machine gun, M249 SAW and the M203 grenade launcher. I loved shooting. You know what doesn't feel anything like shooting a firearm? Clicking a fucking mouse! In addition a tactical reload is a little more complicated than pressing a button in real life. If Call of Duty can make you into a goddamn super-soldier they why isn't Madden producing more top football players?
it was a joke jab at his console autoaim since consoles cant aim properly.....
I know. The venom in my post wasn't aimed at the previous posters (I find nothing in their posts that would justify such a reaction but rather, I agree with the first and find the next two rather amusing) but at that utter stupidity of those who think that a combat related video game can actually teach you how to be a real combatant. A video game with guns will not teach you how to use a gun in real life. Using a controller or clicking a mouse is not only not in the same ballpark as firing a real gun, it isn't even the same sport and yet still the argument that games lead to sociopathic violence somehow persists. It seems to be a stubborn world view based on panic that proves to be utterly immune to any and all reasoning arguments exposing the fallacy of their perspective.

I have trained as a combatant. I have trained in the use of firearms. I have been to war and been in combat. I still suck at Call of Duty. If Call of Duty or any game like it had any effect on how well one could perform in actually combat I wouldn't be here to make this point. Being capable of performing one is MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE from the other and yet the argument persists. Clicking a mouse will not make you a better shot or make it any easier to actually take a life and yet the argument persists. In 2007 the Justice Dept. commissioned a study that showed conclusively that there was no causal link between video games and actual acts of violence and yet the argument persists. Honestly the weight of such audacious and belligerently defended stupidity is just giving me a headache and I think we would all have just as much luck trying to argue cosmology with someone who thinks the earth is a flat disk on the back of a giant turtle.
 

Riobux

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,955
0
0
PoolCleaningRobot said:
I'm willing to bet this interview was bullshit just trying to stir up page views
And this was posted onto this website to stir up page views. Considering this view point of a random police officer doesn't affect anyone at all, and is akin to getting a professional opinion off a homeless person, I'm getting the sneaking suspicion this was posted to stir up a frenzy.
 

EHKOS

Madness to my Methods
Feb 28, 2010
4,815
0
0
Didn't the whole "high score" joke come from /b/? I cannot believe what has come out of this mans mouth, if it were given a name it would be something like "Dumbass Brook". I can feel the hate coming off this guy, even though he understands nothing of the subject. It's kind of sad.
 

DragonStorm247

New member
Mar 5, 2012
288
0
0
Riobux said:
PoolCleaningRobot said:
I'm willing to bet this interview was bullshit just trying to stir up page views
And this was posted onto this website to stir up page views. Considering this view point of a random police officer doesn't affect anyone at all, and is akin to getting a professional opinion off a homeless person, I'm getting the sneaking suspicion this was posted to stir up a frenzy.
Likely. But there are people who actually hear this crap and ignorantly nod their heads. It perpetuates until enough people start believing it, and then you get someone who DOES matter spouting this nonsense.

Idiocy is a plague, and must be dealt with accordingly. Whenever a claim like this outbreaks, publicly denounce it, prevent it from spreading further.
 

Mayamellissa

New member
Dec 3, 2011
169
0
0
He said score sheet I immediately thought of the movie the Frighteners. You know with Micheal J. Fox? By the way Ted Bundy never played video games. Charles Manson and his family of psycho killers never played video games. That veteran officer doesn't know a freaking thing. Video games are being used as merely excuses and cop outs (pun intended) so you can push your agenda and ignore this was a severely disturbed young man who went on a horrific REAL LIFE killing spree.
 

Riobux

New member
Apr 15, 2009
1,955
0
0
DragonStorm247 said:
Likely. But there are people who actually hear this crap and ignorantly nod their heads. It perpetuates until enough people start believing it, and then you get someone who DOES matter spouting this nonsense.

Idiocy is a plague, and must be dealt with accordingly. Whenever a claim like this outbreaks, publicly denounce it, prevent it from spreading further.
Not only people who ignorant nod their head in agreement, but those who shake their head furiously in disagreement. Over what exactly? It's things like this that does make video-gamers create their own monsters, because as soon as someone suggests that video-games are not perfect they scream and throw faeces against the wall. This is despite the people in question affecting absolutely nothing. One only has to notice Anita Sarkeesian to really get a full understanding of how this culture seems to lose their mind at the slightest thing. I think there's a decent chunk of misunderstanding and painting a desired picture (i.e. Anita cherry-picked comments that would come off as abhorrent, ripped from the context of the internet where we hear about rape, murder and sexism as either humour (black or satirical) or exaggeration), but it can not be denied it got born due to gaming culture's apathy towards the idea of only showing anger towards things that matter.

Is it news-worthy that a news website is using video-games as a scape-goat for a massacre? No, this happens so much it's common knowledge it happens. Is it news-worthy a news website cherry-picked someone who can be perceived as a professional, despite said person would not have their opinion ever considered in the academic nor political sphere? No. However, despite this news report not affecting anyone at all, it still got posted and it's still being taunted as though it's an abhorrent thing, as though this news article will be the one article that will change everything. Hell, even if this was a "point and laugh at the stupid ignorant news website", it's worth nothing that while this has been reported, this article about a news program getting shocked at the idea of women playing video games isn't [http://kotaku.com/5991151/breaking-girls-play-video-games-local-news-discovers]. Even if the intention was to point and laugh, and I have to admit to the Escapist this is an article type that reaps in page views and comments, everyone just takes things like this WAY too seriously.
 

DragonStorm247

New member
Mar 5, 2012
288
0
0
Riobux said:
DragonStorm247 said:
Likely. But there are people who actually hear this crap and ignorantly nod their heads. It perpetuates until enough people start believing it, and then you get someone who DOES matter spouting this nonsense.

Idiocy is a plague, and must be dealt with accordingly. Whenever a claim like this outbreaks, publicly denounce it, prevent it from spreading further.
Not only people who ignorant nod their head in agreement, but those who shake their head furiously in disagreement. Over what exactly? It's things like this that does make video-gamers create their own monsters, because as soon as someone suggests that video-games are not perfect they scream and throw faeces against the wall. This is despite the people in question affecting absolutely nothing. One only has to notice Anita Sarkeesian to really get a full understanding of how this culture seems to lose their mind at the slightest thing. I think there's a decent chunk of misunderstanding and painting a desired picture (i.e. Anita cherry-picked comments that would come off as abhorrent, ripped from the context of the internet where we hear about rape, murder and sexism as either humour (black or satirical) or exaggeration), but it can not be denied it got born due to gaming culture's apathy towards the idea of only showing anger towards things that matter.

Is it news-worthy that a news website is using video-games as a scape-goat for a massacre? No, this happens so much it's common knowledge it happens. Is it news-worthy a news website cherry-picked someone who can be perceived as a professional, despite said person would not have their opinion ever considered in the academic nor political sphere? No. However, despite this news report not affecting anyone at all, it still got posted and it's still being taunted as though it's an abhorrent thing, as though this news article will be the one article that will change everything. Hell, even if this was a "point and laugh at the stupid ignorant news website", it's worth nothing that while this has been reported, this article about a news program getting shocked at the idea of women playing video games isn't [http://kotaku.com/5991151/breaking-girls-play-video-games-local-news-discovers]. Even if the intention was to point and laugh, and I have to admit to the Escapist this is an article type that reaps in page views and comments, everyone just takes things like this WAY too seriously.
Hold on, one is not the same as the other. I fully support discussion, and I personally avoid knee jerk responses, taking the time to read the sources and fact check. To refer to your example, I have absolutely no problem with Anita Sarkeesian; I may not completely agree with everything she has to say, but in no way do I condone the vile, thoughtless response that spawned.

This is different.

Like it or not, this was said by someone with an authority position and by an organization *many consider* to be a reliable source of information. These are people who's job is to report and act on facts.


Andy Chalk said:
Cop Blames Videogames For Sandy Hook Massacre

"They believe that (Lanza) believed that it was the way to pick up the easiest points. It's why he didn't want to be killed by law enforcement," he continued. "In the code of a gamer, even a deranged gamer like this little bastard, if somebody else kills you, they get your points. They believe that's why he killed himself."

Permalink
Now, am I surprised by this display of ignorance? Not in the slightest. And that's the problem. I used to be able to laugh this kind of thing off, but its gotten to the point where I can no longer stomach it. The joke has been repeated to death and is no longer amusing. The pattern needs to stop.

As for this specific case, this goes beyond a misguided opinion. That is an utter lie with absolutely no basis in reality, and must be publicly treated as such. Years ago Jack Thompson made the claim that GTA awards you "points" for murdering prostitutes. Today, that claim is widely reported as "long known fact". Arguments in support of various legislation (which actually does have an effect on everyone) used such "knowledge" as their defense.

How long until this "Gamer Code" is established as a well known entity proven to exist?
 

soren7550

Overly Proud New Yorker
Dec 18, 2008
5,477
0
0
Welp, here's something that doesn't improve how dumb this is (yes, it gets worse): the front page story of today's Daily News is them demanding the stop of 'glorified murder simulators' thanks to their 'exclusive report' on how it's all video games fault for that shooting.

To think, the Daily News used to be good.
 

lacktheknack

Je suis joined jewels.
Jan 19, 2009
19,316
0
0
I didn't learn such "advanced tactics" from video games... I applied common logic to video games...

Ah well. What's one more?