Don't know if anyone is still reading this thread but I'm gonna throw my thoughts out there anyways.
"This was the work of a videogamer, and that it was his intent to put his own name at the very top of that list. They believe that he picked an elementary school because he felt it was a point of least resistance, where he could rack up the greatest number of kills. That's what [the Connecticut police] believe,"
This is going to sound super crass if read wrong, but last I checked, schoolchildren aren't exactly worth a lot of points. Most modern unmodded games don't even have children in them, and they're usually immortal when they are present at all. Even then, someone who's trying to 'score up' is gonna go after targets that are worth more.
"They believe that (Lanza) believed that it was the way to pick up the easiest points. It's why he didn't want to be killed by law enforcement," he continued. "In the code of a gamer, even a deranged gamer like this little bastard, if somebody else kills you, they get your points. They believe that's why he killed himself."
In every competitive online game I've ever played, committing suicide comes with a penalty, ranging from score reduction to longer respawn times. Getting killed by the opponent just happens. If the guy really was a gamer, even a 'deranged gamer,' he wouldn't have eaten his own bullet when he could still potentially 'score' by taking a cop or two with him.
The officer said Lanza learned some of the techniques he used in his attack from videogames, including the "tactical reload" - reloading before your current clip empties - and switching to a handgun when the strap broke on his AR-15 rifle. "Classic police training," he said. "Or something you learn playing kill games."
Reloading before your current clip empties now requires 'techniques?' Here I thought it was common sense. And how would you learn to switch to a pistol because your AR-15 strap broke? Cuz I want that game, sounds like an interesting mechanic that I've never even heard of before.
"These guns, one of them an AR-15, in the hands of a violent, insane gamer. It was like porn to a rapist," the unnamed officer claimed. "They feed on it until they go out and say, enough of the video screen. Now I'm actually going to be a hunter."
I'm glad that the fact someone plays video games is somehow more important to you than the fact they were 'violent, insane' in the first place. I'm kind of curious now, how many people that play CoD/BattleField/Insert FPS Here are also gun owners? Willing to bet it's less than the percentage among the general populace. On the other hand, I'm also willing to bet that all of them have porn.