Court Shoots Down Bethesda's Scrolls Request

SnakeoilSage

New member
Sep 20, 2011
1,211
0
0
If I were a judge, I'd look at the fact that "The Elder Scrolls" is almost used as a subtitle for its games - Morrowind, Oblivion, those are the titles most people know them by.

Of course a judge probably doesn't play video games, so that fact probably slips right by them.
 

kouriichi

New member
Sep 5, 2010
2,415
0
0
Id hate to break it to Zenimax, but even the "Elder Scrolls" themselves are rarely mentioned. The Elder Scrolls has almost NOTHING to do with Scrolls to begin with! xD

Dont you only ever interact with the Elder Scrolls once in the entire TES line? Perhaps it should be The Elder Scrolls that gets a name change. ((Due note, i am a HARDCORE fan of TES, and have sunk a % of my life into it.))
 

Xanadu84

New member
Apr 9, 2008
2,946
0
0
So can Zenimax now say that they protected their trademark under the bullshit trademark law? Have they been forced into acting enough like a dick that they can't be screwed over by people who want to steal from them? If so, then I say all is forgiven, assuming the drop this frivolous lawsuit the moment they are able. There is your opportunity to drop out of this mess gracefully. Please Zenimax, take it. And thank you legal system for informing me of what a joke trademark law is.
 

jbchillin

New member
Sep 16, 2010
325
0
0
the thing that i still dont get is how can a company trademark a single word. Notch is calling the game "Scrolls" not "The _____ Scrolls". Anyways i agree that zenimax should try to protect the copyright but they should of tried to settle it out of court. I also think that notch should make a new game and call it FallIn, Fallaround, The Brinks, ect..
 

DJ_DEnM

My brother answers too!
Dec 22, 2010
1,869
0
0
Ugh, it's like when the fat bully and another kid fight over like a chocolate bar in kindergarten and the teacher splits it and the fat kids like "I wanted ALL of it" and cries/pouts.

That was the first thing that came to mind.
 

Macrobstar

New member
Apr 28, 2010
896
0
0
Tharwen said:
HOW COULD THERE BE ANY OTHER OUTCOME YOU CAN'T COPYRIGHT A WORD IT'S STUPID
Actually mojang tried to copyright a word, so in effect bethesda should have won is what your saying, which is true because they where only trying to protect their brand
 

anian

New member
Sep 10, 2008
288
0
0
Ragsnstitches said:
You miss the point... Scrolls will not damage/alter Elder Scrolls. Mojang will not outdo Bethesda. There will be fuck all confusion.

BUT...

If Zenimax did not pursue this, it COULD dilute their trademark which COULD leave their Trademark vulnerable.

For example, take a dickshit like the guy from the "Edge" case... suppose someone with good knowledge of Trademark laws and no moral fiber whatsoever, decided to exploit this and other weaknesses likely missed by zenimax. Of course he couldn't steal the franchise from under them, but he could cause problems for future instalments of the franchise. He COULD do a lot more damage, but it is highly unlikely.

There is enough of a similarity between Scrolls and Elder Scrolls to warrant caution but not enough to win a case in my opinion. Regardless, it's not about winning cases... Zeni MUST do this or risk consequences from other sources later.
You know this sounds so stupid it must be true (and I don't mean your explanation but the fact that things work this way).

What I don't get is that you have to sue to protect next time somebody infringes or comes close to your trademark...but what happens (like now) when they actually lost so far. Doesn't that make your trademark weaker? I mean, if "Scrolls" is not close to "Elder scrolls" then basically it's not that well protected, it leaves the trademark weaker anyway because you can make a lot of similar products until basically the trademark protects a very thin line, right?
Like now it is what it is but it's not the game Scrolls, then a lot things come with similar names and soon your trademark "Elder scrolls" means "a 1st or 3rd person rpg in a fantasy setting that happens in a special section of fantasy realm which includes Morrowind etc."
 

Macrobstar

New member
Apr 28, 2010
896
0
0
JasonKaotic said:
I did a disturbing cackle when I saw the topic.
One point for non-doucheness!
Im sorry but trademarking one word is NON-doucheness wow you learn something new everyday
 

Twilight_guy

Sight, Sound, and Mind
Nov 24, 2008
7,131
0
0
Most generically bland games names ever:
Scrolls
Rage
Magic
Drive
Fuel

Hell, come on at least add a subtitle. Try to look as if you're not just continuing to the use the working title that you grew a bit too fond of their buddy.
 

Ragsnstitches

New member
Dec 2, 2009
1,871
0
0
Baresark said:
Ragsnstitches said:
You seem like a reasonable and informed kind of guy/girl. I have a question for you, something that is bothering me. Maybe you covered it in your post already, and if you have, I apologize. Does the company who loses the case have to change their trademark?

So, if Bethesda/Zenimax loses, do they lose the right to use "The Elder Scrolls" in future games? Or if Mojang loses, do they lose the right to use "Scrolls"? I'm not a lawyer but to me it seems like their has to be something at stake in order for their to be a legal case about it.

Or does Mojang simply have to prove that there is not any confusion and then both get to keep moving forward with there respective trademarks, which would be recognized as not similar enough to matter?

It seems to me this matter that Bethesda/Zenimax, "must sue in order to protect", would be voided altogether unless Bethesda/Zenimax felt that there would be other aspects of the game that would be similar. Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong.

Thanks
I'm not too sure about how the results of the case will unfold.

What's at stake is primarily on Zenimax's field. If Zeni does NOT contest the case, someone somewhere at some time could argue, though unlikely, that The Elder Scrolls Trademark is weak and that they can use it for their own gain... that's probably not right, but the risk is something akin to the strength of the trademark in the eyes of the law... it would be like if Coca Cola had to accept their brand (label, name, colour scheme etc) is no longer protected and everyone and their mother starts copying them in order to make money off of the famous label, because they can.

I know that Mojang won't lose the rights to their game, but might have to change the name. Not a subtitle, but a full name change. He could keep scroll in the title if affixes something to it like "Scrolls of War" or "Scrolls of Time" or whatever is thematically appropriate as long as it's not Scrolls or "Ancient/Weathered/Seasoned Scrolls". I read somewhere that the context and language (grammatical correctness) used in making a trademark is VERY important, but I'm not sure exactly how.

Worst case would be a "rephrasing" of his trademark, so that it doesn't encompass so much stuff (you should google what he had trademarked under scrolls... like he was trying to own the word). Still, Mojang can't lose their game to Zeni, just the name.

In this event, a distinction between the 2 labels is created by act of a name change (or whatever is deemed appropriate by the courts). Mojang loses out on their title, or wiggle room for the franchise, but it's a minor thing for a fledgling product. Zenimax proves their Trademark is strong and can use this case against other infringers in the future, if it's appropriate.

If Mojang win nothing physically changes, but a clear official distinction will be established between the 2 trademarks, so the 2 trademarks can then exist independently without conflicts (as long as notch doesn't do something stupid like call his next game "Scrolls: Skyrim" or Bethesda make a card based game based on The Elder Scrolls). Zenimax will just accept that Scrolls exist as another game, but confident in the fact it's distinguished from their product and their Trademark has been used actively in court which prevents it from being "diluted" or weakened.

A rephrasing of his trademarks might still be needed, even if he wins... it's just ludicrously wide reaching.

Now my research was surface research at best, I am no lawyer and a lot of the nitty gritty goes way over my head... I can't fully or accurately tell you about the risks for Mojang or Zenimax over this case. All I know is that in Trademark laws, a possible infringement must be confronted, or your trademark might be seen as weak and not worth protecting from public use. Essentially making a brand or label part of the public domain.

TL/DR:

Yes the name "Scrolls" is at risk for mojang, but it is minor compared to what COULD be at risk for Zenimax and Bethesda, if this did not go to court.

It's a lot of hearsay, paranoia and speculation frankly, but Zenimax is sitting on a multi-million dollar franchise and would do wisely not to let their guard down. Some people are just scumbags and would walk all over them if they could.

Their is no physical gain for Zenimax, just confidence in their trademark (win or lose) and the loss for mojang in the worst case scenario is superficial and maybe a little damaged pride. He will recover without a doubt.

WITH ALL THAT SAID:

I think notch will win, but will need to compromise all the same. His Trademark of the word "Scrolls" is just so vast it's silly. He didn't need such a far reaching trademark for his game and can always just make new trademarks if he wants to expand his franchise.
 

Zefar

New member
May 11, 2009
485
0
0
Undead Dragon King said:
What is the Swedish system of law based on? Is it closer to Roman or Common law, or is it a legal system all it's own?

I ask because Sweden was never conquered by the Romans, or by a country that was conquered by the Romans, or by the British, which was the primary means of spreading those legal systems.
In a way the law system is based that of the Bible. They used the bible God and said how powerful it was compared to our Viking guards and people started to follow it.
But since like 80% of the Sweden is atheist by now we only really took the better laws from the book and made them better. Yes there are plenty of bad laws in it.

I also suppose our judges actually have some decent amount of intelligence unlike those from USA who sides with every idiot out there in the most stupid lawsuits ever.

That's my limited understanding of the Swedish laws. We still have some stupid laws.
 

DaJoW

New member
Aug 17, 2010
520
0
0
Undead Dragon King said:
What is the Swedish system of law based on? Is it closer to Roman or Common law, or is it a legal system all it's own?

I ask because Sweden was never conquered by the Romans, or by a country that was conquered by the Romans, or by the British, which was the primary means of spreading those legal systems.
I think our system pretty much only exists in the Nordic countries. According to Wikipedia: "[Sweden uses]: Scandinavian-German civil law. Like all Scandinavian legal systems, it is distinguished by its traditional character and for the fact that it did not adopt elements of Roman law. It is indeed worth mentioning that it assimilated very few elements of foreign laws whatsoever. It is also interesting that the Napoleonic Code had no influence in codification of law in Scandinavia. The historical basis of the law of Sweden, just as for all Nordic countries, is Old German law. Codification of the law started in Sweden during the 18th century, preceding the codifications of most other European countries."

Not sure how well, that answers your question, but yeah: Neither Roman nor Common law. Worth noting is that we have no juries (apart from freedom of expression cases, but the juries still do not do the ruling).

OT: The ruling seems to have been made based on three things: 1) "Scrolls" is a very descriptive title and not just an attempt to steal attention from Bethesda; 2) Scrolls is a very common word when dealing with fantsy-settings; 3) Gamers can distinguish between the two.

3 could probably be challenged by ZeniMax I'd say, since it isn't just gamers who buy the game (which is more likely the case of Scrolls). Then again, Scrolls only being distributed by download, presumably from Mojangs website, should mean most people won't even find it when trying to buy a TES game.
 

Yopaz

Sarcastic overlord
Jun 3, 2009
6,092
0
0
Fayathon said:
As it has been said before, both parties win in this because Zenimax has shown that they will act if their trademark is perceived as threatened, and Mojang wins because they (probably) won't have to change the name of their new game. Let's hope it stays that way, and everyone gets to walk away happy in the end.
Yeah, Bethesda protected their trademark as law demanded them to. Mojang won the case and wont have to change the name. Bethesda still have the right to defend their name if any other cases with games that have similar names actually tries to rip them off.

Hopefully Bethesda will be satisfied with this and move on.

Chelsea O said:
so the maker of a shit game won and a great series will suffer for it,titles in the elder scrolls series will likely not be allowed to carry "the elder scrolls" title cause now shit-head mojang owns the word scrolls.
You get this wrong. Notch didn't file for trademark. He was in court accused for trademark violation. What this means is that Notch wont have to change he name of his upcoming game and neither will Bethesda have to stand by and let someone make a game called The Older Oblivion. If Notch filed for trademarking the word scrolls that would be a completely different lawsuit.
 

Speakercone

New member
May 21, 2010
480
0
0
SnakeoilSage said:
If I were a judge, I'd look at the fact that "The Elder Scrolls" is almost used as a subtitle for its games - Morrowind, Oblivion, those are the titles most people know them by.

Of course a judge probably doesn't play video games, so that fact probably slips right by them.
And The Lord of the Rings is a subtitle to The Fellowship of the Ring. You still can't call a novel something like "The Earl of the Ring by B.R.R. taulken". On the other hand, you can call it something like "Rings" or include the word "ring" in the title without too much trouble because the chance of confusion is minimal.

Also, the judge at the initial injunction hearing appears to understand the gaming industry to a certain extent even if he doesn't play games himself. If another judge needs to know more, it's the job of counsel to inform them.
 

ravensshade

resident shadow
Mar 18, 2009
1,900
0
0
freaper said:
Jibblejab said:
I wanted Bethesda to win, mostly because I have Notch with a fiery passion.
I thought Notch was already engaged/married? How come you have him with a fiery passion?
who knows maybe this is his darling speaking
 

Tharwen

Ep. VI: Return of the turret
May 7, 2009
9,145
0
41
Macrobstar said:
Tharwen said:
HOW COULD THERE BE ANY OTHER OUTCOME YOU CAN'T COPYRIGHT A WORD IT'S STUPID
Actually mojang tried to copyright a word, so in effect bethesda should have won is what your saying, which is true because they where only trying to protect their brand
No they didn't, for two reasons.

The first is that this is a trademark case, and the second is that Mojang never did anything to create or maintain a trademark on the name.