Critical Miss: LESBIANS
- Thread starter The Wooster
- Start date
I wouldn't really call it a dick joke...just a swipe at vogue, unless it's something even more "subtle". I wouldn't call it subtle either, just hard to see.Queen Michael said:
My question is if 'neither of them' is true, then who or what is Mol in relation to Erin? I'd always assumed they were together, but roommates, sisters, maybe?
I was under the impression that it was baitin dick not latin dick... you gelatinous hambeast.zombie711 said:
You need to post a version of that Vogue cover with legible text, all of it, not just your dick jokes. Also, why does she have a Vogue cover poster, and is that anybody specific in the picture, or just a generic model?Grey Carter said:
I'm almost positive it says "eatin" dick.Wandrecanada said:
This comic does bring up one question you failed to answer in the subtext. Why WOULD Knuckles be fighting Bowser?
I dunno, maybe we're getting exactly what was advertised and Grey and Corey are just in denial about characters that have taken on lives of their own. Just 'cuz they are Lesbians doesn't mean there is going to be sex involved in the strip.
While your distracted by the image of Knuckles and Bowser you tend to overlook a surprising phallic object lying on the shelf next to them. Then down below you have this "obelisk" looking thing.... and well I'm sure nobody here has ever seen a movie with a girl doing a full split in supension being slowly and painfully lowered...
Then why do we have a babe on a vogue cover in a girl's office? Or is that supposed to be Jason Stathem in Drag (hard to tell). Either way it's noticible since the lady in question apparently doesn't report for Vogue and it's not her cover.
Yes, Corey and Grey are in denial, going "no, our creations are not like this... we just started drawing them, and wow... no, just no. Artistic creations cannot take on their own life. This is NOT a warped version of Galatea in 2-D... ARGGHHHHH!!!!"
Now, I'll lead you to wonder whether I'm joking or if I'm entirely serious.........
While your distracted by the image of Knuckles and Bowser you tend to overlook a surprising phallic object lying on the shelf next to them. Then down below you have this "obelisk" looking thing.... and well I'm sure nobody here has ever seen a movie with a girl doing a full split in supension being slowly and painfully lowered...
Then why do we have a babe on a vogue cover in a girl's office? Or is that supposed to be Jason Stathem in Drag (hard to tell). Either way it's noticible since the lady in question apparently doesn't report for Vogue and it's not her cover.
Yes, Corey and Grey are in denial, going "no, our creations are not like this... we just started drawing them, and wow... no, just no. Artistic creations cannot take on their own life. This is NOT a warped version of Galatea in 2-D... ARGGHHHHH!!!!"
Now, I'll lead you to wonder whether I'm joking or if I'm entirely serious.........
I sat there for 10 seconds going "Wait... What did..."
But then I got it and laughed. Now I have lesbians on the mind though.
But then I got it and laughed. Now I have lesbians on the mind though.
And the stupidity talked about in the comic will continue until we figure out a way to get away from the ad supported model where page loads, no matter how misleading the link that got the person there was, equal money.
Would the Escapist treat us that way?Vrach said:So is this satire on the long-ongoing trend of Escapist News Section using misleading titles?
Anyway, well done
Anyway, couldn't help but think of Boston Legal